[debian-sparc subscribers, please disregard the X-No-CC header above]
[though since I'm a SPARC owner now, I should subscribe...]
> We now seem to have 2.2.16 boot-floppies for everyone, so the main thing
> we're waiting on is X (and a fix for xserver-xsun) which is causing
> problems because we
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 09:26:12AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:49:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > You are one of the most hysterically panicky people I have ever met.
>
> Come on, just asking questions about it ...
>
> btw, just found out that xf4 mesa is incom
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 07:42:34AM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I seem to be having a problem with Sawfish's GNOME capplets:
Your question is inappropriate for this mailing list. Have you even read
the charter of this mailing list? You can find it at the URL below but I
w
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:30:03AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Please, there is no need to CC me list replies; please see the headers of
this message, as well as the one to which you replied.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I think it is a feedback loop.
>
> Please note at least that there are a
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:56:34AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:38:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have no idea what the Vietnamese character set is called.
>
> VISCII. Since it's a 8-bit character set that's a subset of Unicode, it's
> little different from
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sensible-x-terminal and x-terminal-emulator
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:38:01 -0500
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 08:07:11AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Well, to request sensible-x-terminal-emulator does not mean
> > furious forking of terminal emulators, IMHO.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sensible-x-terminal and x-terminal-emulator
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:38:01 -0500
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 08:07:11AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Well, to request sensible-x-terminal-emulator does not mean
> > furious forking of terminal emulators, IMHO.
Hi everyone,
I seem to be having a problem with Sawfish's GNOME capplets: unlike all
other capplets, Sawfish's capplets always require me to press "Try" before
pressing "OK" to actually make the changes have any effect. Otherwise,
they are silently ignored, as if I had pressed "Cancel".
On all ma
Hi everyone,
I seem to be having a problem with Sawfish's GNOME capplets: unlike all
other capplets, Sawfish's capplets always require me to press "Try" before
pressing "OK" to actually make the changes have any effect. Otherwise,
they are silently ignored, as if I had pressed "Cancel".
On all m
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:49:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> You are one of the most hysterically panicky people I have ever met.
Come on, just asking questions about it ...
btw, just found out that xf4 mesa is incompatible with potato and current
woody wine (fix on the way for woody it se
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:38:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [1] I don't know if this specific example is correct. To the beast of my
> limited knowledge, Han is the Chinese character set, Hangul is Korean, and
> Japan has at least three: Hirigana, Katakana, and Kanji. I have no idea
> wh
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:38:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thus hanterm might have priority 50 while xterm has only priority 20. But
> hanterm would be depended upon by, for instance, task-chinese-t[1], which
> Americans and Europeans likely would not install.
>
> [1] I don't know if th
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:49:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> You are one of the most hysterically panicky people I have ever met.
Come on, just asking questions about it ...
btw, just found out that xf4 mesa is incompatible with potato and current
woody wine (fix on the way for woody it s
13 matches
Mail list logo
