> > In that case, I plan to drop Xlib libc5-compatibility for m68k in woody.
> >
> > We might as well retain it in potato, this close to the release.
> Michael, did you read Brandens announcement by now?
Yep (the URL you quoted, if that's what you mean; there were no
'corrections').
> Please, no
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:55:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 03:18:32PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > OK it seems we agreed that libc5 support for xfree86 can be dropped on
> > m68k anytime (the sooner the better, last time I built xfree it doubled
> > build times
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 03:18:32PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> OK it seems we agreed that libc5 support for xfree86 can be dropped on
> m68k anytime (the sooner the better, last time I built xfree it doubled
> build times).
In that case, I plan to drop Xlib libc5-compatibility for m68k in wood
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 11:03:19AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:02:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > My latest attempt at a final build for potato is there.
> The latest or the final final?
That's up to the people who submit release-critical bugs... :(
--
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:02:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> My latest attempt at a final build for potato is there.
The latest or the final final?
> Porters/build daemon folks, please be aware that it's there, and let me
> know if there are any problems. The packages work fine on my box,
My latest attempt at a final build for potato is there.
Porters/build daemon folks, please be aware that it's there, and let me
know if there are any problems. The packages work fine on my box, and the
changes were very minimal from -5.
While I was at it I added some documentation...God forbid.
6 matches
Mail list logo
