On 2015-02-04 20:45, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Can we change that rebuild to once or twice a week, please? Changes to
> the release-notes are not that often.
Just curious: Is the rebuild done, when there are no changes?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Quoting Neil McGovern :
* Deploy weblate for translations,
This would require http://bugs.debian.org/745661 to be fixed.
Which would also help others who want to use the tool.
* Update large chunks of the site to use pofiles. Some files use it but
not for all content, and there's a number of
Quoting Andreas Tille :
I can ensure that ~260MiB is quite much for my Vietnamese friend Minh
who just started with the translations.
I wonder whether we should keep the complete history of the Debian web
in git. Who needs this? Why not cut it at some point, maybe with a year
of overlap between
Hi, the problem is described perfectly by Kevin here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2007/12/msg00120.html
I share his problem, but unfortunately not his luck in having a
browser cache copy on another machine. Any hints? TIA.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 07:56:52PM +0100, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> For some odd reason, wiki.d.o Moinmoin seems to drop the final "=" at
> the end of the password:
>
> For instance, if you receive a mail like the one below, the password you
> should type is
> {SHA}q9oZMiE2z1Q29Gw0Z5InHpPpz2A=
On 2008-09-22 14:48, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Apparently we're linking to http://people.debian.org/~debacle/refcard/
> from the main documentation page. WTF?
Matt Kraai wrote on 2005-02-26 on this list, that he put the
link there. The new address is http://xinocat.com/refcard/ btw.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On 2008-11-13 21:09, Simon Paillard wrote:
> I do (to increase chances, CCing debian-www is better :-)
:~)
> Some remarks :
> - that can be done easily and hosted on http://ddp.alioth.debian.org/
> (easily feasible by anyone in the ddp alioth group), so that we make
> available the alst SVN
On 2008-11-15 14:22, Frans Pop wrote:
> As I've mentioned in the previous mail, it is important for other teams
> such as d-cd too for their release preparations to have the draft version
> available, preferably in its normal location to avoid errors (oops,
> forgot to switch over) at release ti
On 2008-11-15 12:16, Matt Kraai wrote:
> pdflatex appears to hang, consuming 100% of the CPU. I've attached
> the log file. This also appears to hang the official build, so I'm
> going to revert the change to 7release-notes.
>
> Any suggestions?
First: The architecture variable was set to a wron
On 2008-11-19 01:53, Simon Paillard wrote:
> The need of backported package for generating documentation was already
> evoked on the list, does someone can sum up / explains our issue ?
AFAIK, we need two backports from lenny to etch: dblatex and xmlroff.
For the former, one has to remove the tex
Hi,
as suggested by Frans Pop, I would like to put the new
release-notes on www.debian.org ASAP. Currently the release
notes are here:
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/branches/release-notes/lenny
Shall we move them to
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes
first?
They shou
On 2008-11-21 23:24, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 08:52:05AM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > Furthermore, two (easy) backports are needed, if we build on
> > etch: dblatex and xmlroff from lenny.
>
> Will request it to DSA.
Luk uploaded the two bac
On 2008-11-22 11:04, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Right. Nevertheless one checks normally only the trunk version out. I think
> it would be a good idea to switch to trunk as soon as working on a new
> release starts. This simplifies contribution a lot.
Yes, I agree. The branch was meant temporarily.
> *
On 2008-11-22 16:55, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Trust me that a single PO file for each language is not more difficult.
> The opposite is true: Since two different files could share strings they
> need currently to be translated multiple times.
True.
> If other people do not agree there is no need to c
On 2008-11-23 16:28, Jens Seidel wrote:
> It is, of course. It is also just a suggestion because I know that many other
> projects do it this way.
OK, please remind me post-lenny :~)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi maintainers of www.debian.org,
please install dblatex 0.2.9-3~bpo40+1 and xmlroff
0.6.0-1.1~bpo40+1 from backports.org. We need those versions for
the lenny release notes. Other documentation will - maybe -
benefit as well. Thanks in advance!
Cheers!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On 2008-11-24 00:25, Luk Claes wrote:
> xmlroff is still building AFAIK, buildd maintainer in Cc.
OK. It's already in p.d.o, but not yet for i386.
Thanks for uploading to bpo, btw.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2008-12-06 17:31, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:00:10PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > The last build of the lenny release notes generated the following error:
> >
> > > (xmlroff:19880): GnomePrint-CRITICAL **:
> > > gnome_rfont_get_glyph_stdadvance: assertion `glyph < GRF_NU
Hi,
I just moved the etch release-notes to the tags directory and
the lenny release-notes from branches to trunk. Translators,
authors, developers, please work on trunk now. Thanks.
Cheers!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On 2008-12-28 12:41, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Do you think we could build the trunk to testing (to avoid hard coding
> the release name), and add a "stable" tag to be build to stable
Sounds reasonable.
> Matt (or someone else with webmaster rights ?) can you svn co thr trunk
> instead of lenny bra
On 2008-12-28 22:16, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2008-12-28 12:41, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > (Though the failing build is not solved nore disabled)
>
> I have disabled PDF for zh_TW for now.
Btw: The PDF in zh_TW compiles fine in my etch chroot. I get a
lot of warnings from xmlro
On 2008-12-29 22:12, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Does our host have all the locales installed/enabled.
I'm not sure whether this is the issue: In my etch chroot, I've
only en_DK.UTF-8 and en_GB.UTF-8, no zh_*.* whatsoever. But
maybe it's a font issue? I have e.g.:
ttf-arphic-bkai00mp
ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp
On 2009-01-02 13:28, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I am currently trying a manual build of the lenny notes. If that works
> well I will enable the automatic build again.
It would be great, if you could also check, whether the build
for zh_TW PDFs works, if the font packages are installed.
(I.e. ttf-arp
On 2009-01-03 22:43, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> FYI:
...
> I think ... for you to see PDF displayed properly for CJK, you need
> CMap data (non-free). Depending on packages, Cmap files are provided by
> * poppler-data package or
> * cmap-adobe-* packages
I don't have poppler-data nor any of the cmap-
On 2009-01-04 03:40, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Are you on etch or lenny?
I built on etch and viewed on lenny.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I like to ask for opinions/help/contribution regarding the lenny
release notes:
0. credits
1. too many bug reports open, missing tests, deadlines
2. hyphenation with dblatex
3. size of PDFs with xmlroff on etch
4. compilation time with dblatex on etch
0. Credits
I added some author and t
On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote:
> I compared the Romanian PDF file with the German one and it looks indeed
> completely
> different. But at least the content seems to be included.
Most languages can work with dblatex, some not. They have to use
xmlroff, which is OK, but the layout does no
Quoting Jens Seidel :
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:41:44AM +0000, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > > PS: Building the last Release Notes took more than 12 hours on
> www-master.
> >
> > dblatex is much faster on lenny than
Quoting Eddy PetriÈor :
> Still, I am wondering, why wasn't Romanian using dblatex in the first place?
To be honest: I don't remember. I will test some stuff on my
etch chroot anyway, so I will also check whether ro builds
with dblatex (backport from lenny) on etch, OK?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Quoting Eddy PetriÈor :
> About the backport, do you already have a backport for all the needed
> packages? I know dblatex and xmlroff are needed, but IIRC some of the
> tex stuff was necessary, too (for UTF-8 support, for example). Or am I
> confusing etch release build system with lenny's?
I do
Admins,
please install libcairo2 from etch-backports on www-master. This
fixes the problem that some PDFs of the lenny release notes are
HUge. Worst example: ml, 32 MB with old libcairo2, 0.4 MB with
Luks backport. We need this very urgent for the lenny release.
Also, make sure, that all ttf-* pa
On 2009-02-06 19:11, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> I will test some stuff on my
> etch chroot anyway, so I will also check whether ro builds
> with dblatex (backport from lenny) on etch, OK?
Tested pdf for ro on etch (with the dblatex backport) and it
looks fine to me. (And of course,
On 2009-02-07 00:56, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> libcairo2 libdirectfb-0.9-25 libpixman-1-0
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libdirectfb-0.9-25 libpixman-1-0
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libcairo2
>
> done.
Thank
On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote:
> I found a funny footnote in the German file
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/alpha/release-notes.de.pdf
> in section 4.5.8 (page 24): There is a large TeX code embedded:
Seems to be complicated. If I don't use the hyphenation hack, it
disappears. A
Hi,
on http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes are some
translations missing:
Three languages, lt, ml, and vi are missing from the web page
(they are installed, but there's no entry in the main page), but
are in good shape. Four other languages, da, fi, ko, and nl are
also missing, bu
On 2009-02-07 09:05, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 11:57:29AM +0000, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > Btw., on www.debian.org we distinguish "Chinese (China)" from
> > "Chinese (Taiwan)". Why is it different here?
>
> I think it's bec
Matt, there are currently no translation for fi nor pl.
Maybe better disable them for now. TIA!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Zitat von "Gerfried Fuchs" :
Again I feel the need to raise my voice about the building time of the
release notes. I just had to kill it once again because it was running
_way_ too long. I am thinking of moving the release note building from
the often cronjob (every four hours) to once a day to
On 2009-02-10 13:14, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Again I feel the need to raise my voice about the building time of the
> release notes. I just had to kill it once again because it was running
> _way_ too long. I am thinking of moving the release note building from
> the often cronjob (every four hour
On 2009-02-11 08:22, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Alright, this is getting ridiculous. Did anyone actually try the build
> on an etch system before it was dumped on us? What times did it take? It
> is now building since over 8 hours and still not finished.
...
> My impression is that the time is curren
[Note: I filed #514932 about the issue.]
On 2009-02-11 08:22, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Alright, this is getting ridiculous. Did anyone actually try the build
> on an etch system before it was dumped on us? What times did it take? It
> is now building since over 8 hours and still not finished.
...
On 2009-02-11 23:37, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
>Now I
>discovered, that there is a bug in dblatex: In one case it
>"forgets" to pass the options to xsltproc. Patch attached
>for review.
How would we get the patch onto the system? Via backports?
--
To UNSUBS
On 2009-02-12 08:13, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2009-02-11 23:37, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> >Now I
> >discovered, that there is a bug in dblatex: In one case it
> >"forgets" to pass the options to xsltproc. Patch attached
> >for review.
>
On 2009-02-12 10:00, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I will give it a manual run and see how long it takes. Hopefully we can
> call the case closed then and I can reactivate the automatic build in
> the often run again.
Maybe you could do two things:
- measure "make pdf LINGUA=en architecture=armel"
a
On 2009-02-12 16:37, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> The manual runs did make me much more happier:
Good!
> an shortly afterwards started second run did take 45 minutes. It's still
> quite some time, but it does for the moment eliminate the overlapping of
> often runs. Further optimization though would
Hi admins,
when I browse e.g.
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/alpha/release-notes.en.txt
in Iceweasel, the browser ignores my default character set
(UTF-8) and interprets the text as whatever. This is probably an
Iceweasel bug, but anyway: it looks very bad. Currently
www.debian.org does no
On 2009-02-12 23:02, Nicolas François wrote:
> That's not something that should be changed now, but after Lenny is
> released, you should try
...
That sounds awesome. I'll try that after release. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
On 2009-02-12 14:11, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Actually, it appears that most of the .txt files on the website use
> some variant of ISO 8859.
Could we (well, not now, but after release) change all files
into UTF-8? The problem with 8859 is, that it is ambiguous.
With find -exec iconv etc. it should be
On 2009-02-12 15:10, Matt Kraai wrote:
> That works. How about changing the release notes build to create
> those files?
OK, done. If anything goes wrong, this is the change to revert:
--- Makefile(revisión: 6488)
+++ Makefile(copia de trabajo)
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@
publish: statistics.html
Hi,
could you disable "ml" (Malayalam) for now, please?
The translation is just not ready.
And, if possible, disable the PDFs for "es" (Spanish).
There is a build error, I don't know why...
TIA!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On 2009-02-12 23:30, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:17:50AM +0000, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > And, if possible, disable the PDFs for "es" (Spanish).
> > There is a build error, I don't know why...
>
> Doesn't this need to be done in the
On 2009-02-13 19:28, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Zitat von "Jens Seidel" :
>> Current dblatex solution is not so ugly ...
>
> Good!
Hey, it looks excellent, nearly like the other dblatex based
PDFs! It builds fine on etch, I just tested in a chroot. Many
thanks, Jens!
W
On 2009-02-13 12:33, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > We have to make sure, that somebody cleans the release notes
> > directory once, so that no cruft gets on the CD images.
>
> What's required? Removing */release-notes*?
Yes, this should do it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debia
s"
* page names: "ch-" prefix was dropped
* anchors: "s-" prefix was dropped.
Yes... it must be someting to do with debiandoc-sgml to docbook-xml
change. These should be customizable by xslt parameters.
I updated some wiki pages but as my second thought I should have as
Quoting "Simon Paillard" :
So question for debacle: do you remember how refcard was published on
the website ?
Was it ever published on a Debian website? Maybe, but I always
have it on a private site: www.tangosoft.com/refcard/
Do you prefer to see it published from SVN or package ?
I'ld pr
Quoting "Gerfried Fuchs" :
Wolfgang, ... are you working on the release notes this time again?
Unfortunately, this year I'm too busy with my real life job. Sorry!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
Quoting "Simon Paillard" :
Any reason to add sgml-howto to ddp Makefile or it is so old that the
doc is no longer valid ?
If I look at the correct document, it seems partly outdated
to me. Are we talking about this?
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/sgml-howto/
To me, too many things have chan
Quoting "Osamu Aoki" :
More problematic is:
http://www.debian.org/doc/docpolicy
Here, at least the following two points:
"""
# We'll use SGML as source format.
Note that this does not mean that users have to learn SGML
to submit changes to our documents. We accept all other
formats
Quoting "Osamu Aoki" :
"Debian FAQ" is DDP document still in debiandoc-sgml.
Between 2008-05-19 and 2008-10-03, I created a docbookified,
po4aified, and utf8ifed branch of the FAQ:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddp/manuals/branches/debian-faq/dbk-po4a-utf8/
At that time it has been decided to move
59 matches
Mail list logo
