On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> I'm sending this to the debian-l10n-spanish list in case somebody
> corrects me here...
>
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 01:57:37PM -0300, Groucho Marx wrote:
> > Hi there!
> > I´m sorry to report this silly bug instead of being able to make a
retitle 129869 libncurses5-dev is missing in www.debian.org
reassign 129869 www.debian.org
severity 129869 normal
thanks
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Chris Harrelson wrote:
> Package: pine4-src
> Version: 1
> Severity: important
>
> When compiling, whenever gcc is passed the -lncurses flag, the linker
>
reassign 145249 www.debian.org
retitle 145249 outdated info about pine, or maybe the FAQ needs an update
severity 145249 normal
thanks
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Tom Allison wrote:
> Package: pine396-src
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-30
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
Claudio wrote:
> Excuse me, for my total ignorance, but i really don't know how to do
> resolve this problem:
> i download the Sarge, all 9 cd, but i can't install it.
> I don't understand if this distribution is bootable, in first. Then, when i
> try to install it using "dselect" of the Potato, i
Josip Rodin wrote:
> It would be polite to note that it is not our intention to get people
> spammed by keeping archives,
But we do not help to fight spam if we keep email addresses in the archives.
We can keep archives without keeping email addresses.
> or that we do it because we're bastards wh
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-01 14:14]:
> > Speak for yourself. I think they would be equally useful if they would
> > not contain private email addresses.
>
> No, they won't. Being able to search the archives and mailing th
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:51:52PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > > It would be polite to note that it is not our intention to get people
> > > spammed by keeping archives, or that we do it because we're bastards who
> > > don't give a , because we ar
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Santiago Vila wrote:
> > But we do not help to fight spam if we keep email addresses in the archives.
> > We can keep archives without keeping email addresses.
>
> Like Alfie said, addresses are useful as well.
No, they are only useful to send unsolici
Hi.
I believe there should be a reference to http://packages.qa.debian.org
somewhere in page http://packages.debian.org (which points to
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages). Is this doable?
Thanks.
Joey Hess wrote:
> Craig Small wrote (to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", which redirects to
> debian-www. Probably wanted listmaster instead:
> > I got quite a few of these.
> >
> > Is there any reason to accept email from Nigeria except to see the
> > variety of fraudsters out there?
>
> We should accept ema
reassign 781809 www.debian.org
thanks
Dear Debian WWW team: I have received the report below against base-files.
I can see this:
https://www.debian.org/support
in Spanish but
https://www.debian.org/support/ gives me 404.
If the intent is for this page not to exist anymore, then please add a
Dear WWW people:
I received this report regarding /etc/os-release.
Since this was reported before, I looked at bugs in www.debian.org and
discovered that in Bug #781809 there was an intent to reassign this back
to base-files, but you forgot to CC both me and control@b.d.o, so I'm
reading it now.
Hello.
https://www.debian.org/users/org/grefa
It says:
rehabilitación de la fauna autocnoma y su habitat
It should probably say:
rehabilitación de la fauna autóctona y su hábitat
Thanks.
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> someome requested me that that I make it more evident in the PTS pages
> that the email address that are part of our "subscribers list" are kept
> private : ie not reselled or anything like that. I looked for such a
> page but I think we don't have any such page for the mai
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Can anyone think of any reason why we shouldn't publish the mbox files of
> the list archives straight on the web?
Yes: More spam for all those who posted anything to any debian list in
the past...
Please take a look at geocrawler and/or sourceforge lists.
We should do someth
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Hans Wilmer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Please take a look at geocrawler and/or sourceforge lists.
> > We should do something similar.
>
> Debian must never do that! It would disclose many people, including
> me, from making use of the mailing lists! We won't be able to post
> into the
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste Rouquier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm a bit concerned that email adresses appear as plain text on
> > http://bugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=25 (and many
> > other bug reports).
> > I have two consecutive good spam filte
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> If humans can read it, spammers can too.
That's inaccurate. You are missing rule #3: Spammers are stupid.
Spammers will only read what they can read by mechanical means.
We would just have to make it difficult for them to obtain email
addresses *so eas
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > If humans can read it, spammers can too.
> >
> > That's inaccurate. You are missing rule #3: Spammers are stupid.
>
>
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >
> > > If humans can read it, spammers can too.
> >
> > That's inaccurate. You are missing rule #3: Spammers are stup
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, RJ Gillis wrote:
> Hi, I am hoping you can help me. I recently had to use 'safe mode'
> and when rebooting, was offer the choice of 'windows' or 'debian
> installer'. I have never seen or heard of debian before and no one
> else uses my pc, so the question is; how did this get
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> Sarge is referred to as "oldstable" in the security announcements.
> Shouldn't it be "old stable" (as was used about Woody when Sarge was
> released)?
The string "oldstable" is the string you would use in /etc/apt/sources.list,
so it should be the corr
[ Sorry for answering so late to this email ]
[ Trimming Cc list a little bit ].
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Beside translator being careful, this funny infinite loop should be
> avoided by gettext tool set. This is msgfmt faital errors.
> [...]
>
> As I see there has been no obvio
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Ligia González Diosdado wrote:
> Buenas tardes, soy Ligia González Diosdado hermana de José Antonio
> González Diosdado, mi hermano falleció el 10 de enero del presente año,
> por lo que ya no se harán distribuciones de debian, no sé si necesiten
> que lleve algún documento a a
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I download ,dialog arm package from some mirror site,
> There are not any follow files in package
>
> usr/bin/dialog
> usr/include/dialog.h
> usr/include/dlg_colors.h
> usr/include/dlg_config.h
> usr/lib/libdialog.a
> usr/lib/perl5/dialog.pl
Pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Sue Campbell wrote:
> I like the idea that of having consistency between all the sites,
> but are we asking too much?
Why not /pub/debian? I think this would be easier.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Sue Campbell wrote:
> To date, we have requested that official Debian ftp sites have a
> soft link from / to the actual archive so that people can access
> Debian by http://ftp..debian.org/debian
I wrote:
> Why not /pub/debian? I think this
27 matches
Mail list logo
