failed
experiment, at least pending further work on Sphinx, and we should just
publish the multi-page version. What do other people think? (Adding
debian-www for their opinion as well.)
Not having working footnotes feels to me like kind of a showstopper.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Lintian bugs #907725 and #878609 were due to some confusion because the
section documentation at https://packages.debian.org/en/sid/ says both:
X Window System software
X servers, libraries, fonts, window managers, terminal emulators and
many related ap
ee Software"
with "Open Source Software". This terminology debate reflects
underlying philosophical differences, but the practical requirements
placed on software licenses, and the discussion in the rest of this
page, are essentially the same for both Free Softwa
age at
the top of the page.
I'd be happy to try to help out with a fix if the problem is just that
you're swamped, although I'm not sure where all the pieces are and
probably don't have access, so it may require a bit of poking around.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
I'm not worrying too much about avoiding
uploads to unstable during the release freeze.)
If anyone has any objections, please mention them before Wednesday, May
3rd. My plan is to do the upload probably some time that evening,
although it's always possible that I'll run out of time and
Enrico Zini writes:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 09:26:10PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Is there any way that I or someone can help with the current issue with
>> enrolling on sso.debian.org? It looks like this was originally
>> reported in May of last year on this bug.
>
Antonio Terceiro writes:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 05:50:13PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I think Debian Policy 4.0.0.0 is ready for release.
> One thing I was always curious about: is there a reason to use such a
> deep versioning scheme?
> A shorter version number
debian-www, not debian-web.
Colin Watson writes:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:49:20PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'm still a bit dubious about this, since I don't believe editors and
>> generators normally add it, but given how we generate the text versions
The start of this thread:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2017/06/msg00068.html
Perfect, thank you!
Paul, does this resolve your original issue? I'm a bit worried that it
might not because this was a little bit ago, and I think it should have
already been in place when you were testin
org/doc/devel-manuals#policy
All of the primary links are to HTML.
I'm certainly happy to try to get the text versions correct, but I would
expect most people would prefer to use the HTML versions.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
cter sets with
whatever granularity you want.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
aotic for a bit as we work
through finishing this reStructuredText conversion. Apologies for the
extra work! We think the long-term result will be worth it both in terms
of better output and in terms of a more maintainable Policy document.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
t the only use of
Javascript is just the search box. I don't really want to do a lot of
meddling with the Sphinx output (since part of the goal is to let Sphinx
take care of the details of output), but this doesn't look like a ton of
work and looks likely to continue to be supported.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
kaging-manuals/)?copyright-format/(\d+\.\d+)$
> I do not see any policy-related objection. I hope the debian-www team
> can confirm that this URL is available.
Yup, this looks good to me as well (with or without the packaging-manuals
component as debian-www would prefer).
--
Russ Allbe
it to have stable URLs.
I suppose we could have a policy of retiring old versions, but only if
Lintian detects that there are no references to the old version left in
the archive in the current stable release.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
lated from each
other for multiple versions.
There are, of course, ways of arranging this for any URL format, but this
one probably keeps the overall complexity down the most.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:45:02PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> Charles Plessy writes:
>>> - Published versions are stored in the debian-policy in
>>>copyright-format/published/, as XML source and HTML and text
>>>doc
/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s-mime
I think adding a redirect to the relevant section of Policy as you show in
[2] is a great idea.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
be to incorporate Policy
for multiarch (and it may be 3.10.0 for that reason).
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 09:58:37AM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> My first inclination would be to change the debian-policy package to
>> stop generating the broken-down version of the upgrading-checklist that
>> has multiple HTML files (there do
Russ Allbery writes:
> First, I plan on releasing 3.9.3.1 next week with only informative
> changes. I want to update the wording of the copyright format
> specification following subsequent discussion, and there are also a
> variety of informative bugs that have accumulated in the
er the wheezy release regardless. So
we'll have quite some time to figure out what the right thing to do is.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
263 Clarify 9.9 - Environment variables
#648271 11.8.3 says xterm passes -e option straight to exec
#671355 [debconf] document escape capability
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
tart jobs in packages, which I
> think meets your criteria.
Sure, sounds good to me. I was dithering about putting that on my list
already.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
9.11
New section documenting general requirements for alternate init
systems and specific requirements for integrating with upstart.
12.5
All copyright files must be encoded in UTF-8.
Note that the change to make build-arch and build-indep mandatory is not
RC for
cause of how easy it would be to break thousands of Debian systems.
I have tremendous respect for how well the security team does with that.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It continues to be the case that any issue would only be an issue for
lenny, not etch.)
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in RFC 4556 looks a little confusing; it refers to a
"session key" in at least one place when it appears to be referring to
the key protecting the AS-REP enc-part field, which normally would be
the principal's long-term key. (Maybe that's common usage from the
PKI world
entication using a Kerberos KDC with the affected libssl
+should be treated as suspect; it's possible that attackers with packet
+captures will be able to compromise those keys and sessions.
OpenSWAN / StrongSWAN
rm /etc/ipsec.d/private/`hostname`Key.pem
/etc/ipsec.d/certs/`hostname`Ce
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Could you update the list of Debian Policy delegates on
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization? The current delegate list is:
Russ Allbery
Bill Allombert
Andrew McMillan
Manoj Srivastava
Colin Watson
Thanks!
-- System Information
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Could you add a link to the IBM Public License 1.0 to
www.debian.org/legal/licenses/? This license is used by Postfix and
OpenAFS and has been accepted in Debian main since 2000.
The license is at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ibmpl.php
Thanks!
-
MJ Ray writes:
> Russ Allbery
>> Could you add a link to the IBM Public License 1.0 to
>> www.debian.org/legal/licenses/? This license is used by Postfix and
>> OpenAFS and has been accepted in Debian main since 2000.
> I suspect it didn't appear there because
f marking pages as having
been reviewed for that purpose so that they don't show up again unless
they're modified further.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
Frank Lin PIAT writes:
> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 13:05 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I can definitely see the appeal in having users know that every tag has
>> a page, and we can always look through the wiki for modified pages to
>> pull those details into the tags (although
34 matches
Mail list logo
