We obviously have extreme problems with master's load. My archive
scripts which used to take about 1.5 or 2 hours to run a few months
ago now take 10 hours or more. I think the mailing lists are the main
culprits here. The addition of the real time black hole stuff was the
proverbial straw. Hop
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do not know why your cron jobs are so much slower, I have seen them
> steadally take longer and longer, today one has been running in excess of
> 8 hours already. Perhaps there is a bug?
That's the Contents file getting rebuilt. It's a huge job, bu
I've fixed two problems: You can now search multiple dates, and the
engine will search all the relevant indexes. Also the script filters
out the header html so there aren't false matches on next and previous
emails when the hit is in the Subject.
I don't subscribe to this list, so please CC on co
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was just thinking about this today. I used it this morning to search for
> 'ipsec'. I was a bit annoyed that you could not select multiple lists, I
> wasn't sure if it was -devel or -user. Also the return results had all
> sorts of quoted HTML markup
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are at least 2 backup ftp maintainers, dark and james..
They are more than backups. They handle all the day-to-day work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will reach all three of us.
> Guy is involved with the bug list maintiance somehow
Fixing easy bugs and
Thanks to the debian weekly news articles, I noticed that Darren is
looking into new list archiving software. Serendipitously, I was
playing around with mhonarc this morning. I fixed the bug with
Wichert's messages, and I made it generate split indices.
I think I can just regenerate new indices
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If regenerating the whole thing changes all the urls to messages
It wouldn't.
Guy
I'm testing some improvements to the list archiver. If you want see
an example, go to http://www.debian.org/~maor/debian-devel-9901/
If you have any suggestions, I'd like to hear them.
Guy
Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Wicherts PGP signed messages (and other such "breakeages")
Fixed.
> * Lean, DFSG-free search engine
Yes, I'd like to use something besides glimpse.
> * File count. The Lists-Archives are getting large and un-rsyncable.
That's going to be harder t
Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> Guy,
>
> I like the improved archiver! My compliments. I really like the trailer at
Thanks. Yes, the trailer was always there.
> but it got lost in the noise. The only thing I *might* add is a subject index
> that, instead of threading, li
Marko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - I think the Security-page /security/index.html should only be
> localized if the translators can update it often.
Could there be some automatic solution? For example contact
negotiation is turned off (and English is presented) when the English
page
Unfortunately I have to regenerate the list archives to install the
new .rc files that I showed earlier. The URLs for individual messages
won't change though. I have only regenerated this month so far, and I
will *slowly* work my back - perhaps one month every other day.
Guy
Hmm. Regenerating all of Feb 99 is a 76 meg fetch. Is that
acceptible to be at once?
Guy
Jan Vroonhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.tug.org/ListsArchives/pstricks/threads.html
They use mhonarc also. What in particular to like about their
configuration?
Guy
It now has links to the gzipped mbox files.
Guy
David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> glimpse: pattern '19126' has no characters that were indexed: glimpse
> cannot search for it (to search for numbers, make the index using
> 'glimpseindex -n ...')
> Exit code 1
I want to toss glimpse and write my own search engine anyway for
mhonarc l
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you folks please consider uncompressing those announcement
> lists like:
>
> debian-announce
> debian-news
> debian-devel-announce
> debian-security-announce
ok, I did that.
We're a fairly loquacious bunch, having genera
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.mds.rmit.edu.au/mg/
This looks promising. Thanks for the pointer.
Guy
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just curious--have you looked at htdig?
It's better to have something where you can easily modify the data
coming in and out of it. So something designed as a freetext search
rather than a web server is more appropriate for mailing list
searches.
Unf
"James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe he would prefer a program that allows you to index files
> directly as opposed to having to go through a web server.
Yes, and also I want a program where I can substitute my own program
to preprocess and postprocess the data files.
I'd li
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does this have secure login yet?
Yes - https://db.debian.org
Guy
"James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe there is a CVS program for windows available.
Yes, it's possible to compile cvs as a native Windows program, or with
cygwin.
Guy
I'd like to give away maintainership of the web list archiving and
searching. I originally wrote the scripts but don't have time to
maintain or enhance them.
Apart from some very minor maintainance, the major project is building
a good free search engine for mhonarc-based lists, something with as
"Darren O. Benham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not have "the web team" take them over? I'm agreeable.. the rest of
> you?
Since I got a few volunteers, I'll choose among them. That person can
then effectively join you guys.
Guy
> I was wondering if there is a specific script that should be used to do
> this, or should I just gather the mbox files from the year 1998, gzip them,
> move them into the web-accessible directory and remove the HTML copies?
No, there's no script, but you've already described how to do it. This
i
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, we were using 4.1 so far... and 3.0 and 3.6 are also non-free just
> a bit more free. What's this note about then? :)
At one point, the archive search was using 3.x, which I thought was
free. 4.x was more stable or had some feature I really want
26 matches
Mail list logo
