Who's using Debian?

We do. -- www.arenalbotanicalgarden.com Skype, arenalgarden *When all of the trees are cut down;* *When all of the rivers and lakes are polluted;* *When all of the fish have been caught from the sea;* *Only then will you realize that money cannot be eaten.*

Bug#705576: [RFR] wml://intro/about.wml

David Prévot wrote: > Le 16/04/2013 23:13, Robert Pogson a écrit : >> To the extent that more people using Debian GNU/Linux will make the world >> a better place, I suggest these features not be "undersold". I propose >> this wording for that paragraph, > > Please, find it attached in diff format

Bug#705576: [RFR] wml://intro/about.wml

Perhaps "enable" would be a better word than "allow". It changes focus from the system to the user which is consistent with the ideals of Free Software. I remember the last position I had where I begged and bullied our PCs to update with that other OS. Changing to Debian GNU/Linux and using APT en

Bug#705576: [RFR] wml://intro/about.wml

robert pogson wrote: > Perhaps "enable" would be a better word than "allow". Yes; "allow" is almost always arguable (except for things like PAM), and I have a natural bias against it since my work on debian-l10n-english frequently involves correcting sentences along the lines of "APT allows to man

Bug#705576: [RFR] wml://intro/about.wml

Justin B Rye wrote, "setting things up for automated installs of thousands of packages on thousands of computers isn't quite a matter of ticking an "enable configuration management" checkbox." Agreed. It's easier. APT and openssh-server combined with distributing a public key enables configuration

Bug#705576: [RFR] wml://intro/about.wml

robert pogson wrote: > Justin B Rye wrote, "setting things up for automated installs of > thousands of packages on thousands of computers isn't quite a matter > of ticking an "enable configuration management" checkbox." > > Agreed. It's easier. Okay, now I think you're detectably exaggerating. A

Bug#646150: www.debian.org: please define a policy for event locations

On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:17:03AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 15:34 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > > > I have started to document this on a wiki page [1], I will wait one more > > week before sending an RFC to the d-publicity@ mailing list. > > > > [1]

Bug#381555: Patch for image digest links

tags -1 - patch Hi Imran, Thanks for your interest in improving the website, and sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Le 10/04/2013 11:14, Imran Chaudhry a écrit : > I have attached a patch for this (or rather the whole .wml files). Attached in patch format (those pages changed quite a

Processed: tagging 555967

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 555967 - patch Bug #555967 [www.debian.org] [patch] describe gb, dw commands in wanna-build-states.wml Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 555967: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Processed: tagging 381555

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 381555 - patch Bug #381555 [www.debian.org] http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ : add link to iso md5 cheksum Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 381555: http://bugs.debian.or

Processed: tagging 613832

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # The issue doesn’t seem to have reached a consensus > tags 613832 - patch Bug #613832 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Debian sister association in the merchandise page Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#657297: www.debian.org: please show more type of events, e.g. talks/sprints/IRC-meetings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 25/01/2012 07:39, Luca Capello a écrit : > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:48:22 +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote: >> Sorry for the delay in replying this: Luca is talking here about the idea >> to have, in www.d.o/events page, not only the list of upco

Bug#646150: www.debian.org: please define a policy for event locations

On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 19:42 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Since there doesn’t seem to be any team willing to update the > ww.d.o/events section any more [2], is this issue still relevant? > > 2: > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/events/index.wml?r1=1.43&r2=1.44 > >