On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 02:38:57AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Thanks for the info, but currently we're having trouble compiling
> *cleanly* the pdf version even on lenny.
I compared the Romanian PDF file with the German one and it looks indeed
completely
different. But at least the content see
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:41:44AM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > I compared the Romanian PDF file with the German one and it looks indeed
> > completely
> > different. But at least the content seems to be included.
>
> Most languages can work with d
On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote:
> I compared the Romanian PDF file with the German one and it looks indeed
> completely
> different. But at least the content seems to be included.
Most languages can work with dblatex, some not. They have to use
xmlroff, which is OK, but the layout does no
Quoting Jens Seidel :
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:41:44AM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > > PS: Building the last Release Notes took more than 12 hours on
> www-master.
> >
> > dblatex is much faster on lenny than on etch. Also, po4a seems
> > to eat
(-doc and -www, please CC me)
2009/2/6 Eddy Petrișor :
>>> - Should lenny's release notes be compilable on etch?
>>=20
>> Yes.
>
> Thanks for the info, but currently we're having trouble compiling
> *cleanly* the pdf version even on lenny.
OK, after looking at the German PDF and seeing the diffe
Quoting Eddy PetriÈor :
> Still, I am wondering, why wasn't Romanian using dblatex in the first place?
To be honest: I don't remember. I will test some stuff on my
etch chroot anyway, so I will also check whether ro builds
with dblatex (backport from lenny) on etch, OK?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
(keep me CC-ed)
2009/2/6 W. Martin Borgert :
> Quoting Eddy Petrișor :
>> Still, I am wondering, why wasn't Romanian using dblatex in the first place?
>
> To be honest: I don't remember. I will test some stuff on my
> etch chroot anyway, so I will also check whether ro builds
> with dblatex (backpo
Quoting Eddy PetriÈor :
> About the backport, do you already have a backport for all the needed
> packages? I know dblatex and xmlroff are needed, but IIRC some of the
> tex stuff was necessary, too (for UTF-8 support, for example). Or am I
> confusing etch release build system with lenny's?
I do
Admins,
please install libcairo2 from etch-backports on www-master. This
fixes the problem that some PDFs of the lenny release notes are
HUge. Worst example: ml, 32 MB with old libcairo2, 0.4 MB with
Luks backport. We need this very urgent for the lenny release.
Also, make sure, that all ttf-* pa
On 2009-02-06 19:11, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> I will test some stuff on my
> etch chroot anyway, so I will also check whether ro builds
> with dblatex (backport from lenny) on etch, OK?
Tested pdf for ro on etch (with the dblatex backport) and it
looks fine to me. (And of course, it looks better
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Admins,
>
> please install libcairo2 from etch-backports on www-master. This
> fixes the problem that some PDFs of the lenny release notes are
> HUge. Worst example: ml, 32 MB with old libcairo2, 0.4 MB with
> Luks backport. We need this very urgent
On 2009-02-07 00:56, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> libcairo2 libdirectfb-0.9-25 libpixman-1-0
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libdirectfb-0.9-25 libpixman-1-0
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libcairo2
>
> done.
Thank
On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote:
> I found a funny footnote in the German file
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/alpha/release-notes.de.pdf
> in section 4.5.8 (page 24): There is a large TeX code embedded:
Seems to be complicated. If I don't use the hyphenation hack, it
disappears. A
13 matches
Mail list logo
