Bug#137756: www.debian.org: Debian Security Advisories not up to date

2002-03-11 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... we could use a more automated way to publish the web page > excerpts. I've talked to the security officers several times about > this and we have advanced the advisories' format so that they are > mostly parseable. I've written a script to convert the

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by alfie: webwml/german/international/German index.wml

2002-03-11 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-08 18:07]: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 08:35:50AM -0800, Debian WWW CVS wrote: >> Modified files: >> german/international/German: index.wml >> >> Log message: >> Aargh, forgot to bump the translation-check... > > That should be the other way aro

Bug#137756: www.debian.org: Debian Security Advisories not up to date

2002-03-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 11:03:42PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > It sounds like someone should file a bug against debian-security (and if > the bug system supports dependencies, make this one depend on it). > Joint action seems to be required. > > Finally, I do not believe that this bug should be

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by alfie: webwml/german/international/German index.wml

2002-03-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:14:13AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > >> Modified files: > >>german/international/German: index.wml > >> > >> Log message: > >>Aargh, forgot to bump the translation-check... > > > > That should be the other way around -- the German file should be marked as > >

Bug#137839: www.debian.org: i386 port could mention some supported processors

2002-03-11 Thread Colin Watson
Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:31:20PM +0900, Bozin LCpl George S wrote: > Ive taken a look at your ports page and have failed to see support for AMD > processeors. > I would just like to know what port I would need which is listed for my AMD > XP 1700+ proce

Processed: Previous retitle command didn't go to control@bugs

2002-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 136725 "woody Release Information" should mention "man > apt_preferences" Bug#136725: debian-devel-announce should mention "man apt_preferences" Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

ÄúºÃ

2002-03-11 Thread fff
你想拥有更多的金钱吗,新盈利让你梦想成真! 注册参加新盈利商务信息网,你就可以发大财,原因如下: 1 注册参加新盈利商务信息网,即可得到各种商务信息和若干市场转让价在万 元以上的实用技术,它们是助你致富的

Bug#137839: www.debian.org: i386 port could mention some supported processors

2002-03-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 05:58:16AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:31:20PM +0900, Bozin LCpl George S wrote: > > Ive taken a look at your ports page and have failed to see support for AMD > > processeors. > > I would just lik

Bug#137839: www.debian.org: i386 port could mention some supported processors

2002-03-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:34:13PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 05:58:16AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > > Perhaps it would be worth mentioning (in /ports/index.html) a few > > processors supported by the i386 port. You could adapt the text from the > > kernel's Configure.help

Bug#137860: www.debian.org: Search frontend in packages.debian.org could be improved

2002-03-11 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena
Package: www.debian.org Version: 20020311 Severity: wishlist I usually find myself using packages.debian.org/_name_of_package to search for packages, however, many times I mistype the name or the package or I used a word of the package but not the full (exact) name. In all this cases I receive

Bug#137839: www.debian.org: i386 port could mention some supported processors

2002-03-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:03:19PM -0500, Otis Ward wrote: > Mr. Watson, > > I've received your message, I'm sure in error. Could you please recheck your > destination address and try again in case your message never arrived there. > Thanks and take care. I've contacted Otis Ward privately about

Bug#137839: www.debian.org: i386 port could mention some supported processors

2002-03-11 Thread Otis Ward
Mr. Watson, I've received your message, I'm sure in error. Could you please recheck your destination address and try again in case your message never arrived there. Thanks and take care. -- Otis Ward President Machine Interface Consulting, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email (212) 699-3825 x5486 - v

debian-legal list entry - confidential information disclosure

2002-03-11 Thread Anna
To whom it may concern,   It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of their mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential e-mail exchange.   This has been done without seeking our consentand we urge Debian to remove the entry and the follow-ups from its archive

Re: debian-legal list entry - confidential information disclosure

2002-03-11 Thread Mark Rafn
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Anna wrote: > It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of their > mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential e-mail > exchange. This is incorrect terminology. Jorgen Hagg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> published a message, and used debian-legal to do so

Re: debian-legal list entry - confidential information disclosure

2002-03-11 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
"Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of their > mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential e-mail > exchange. I don't know which address in those messages you mean. Are you complaining about the mention of the various emai