Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:45:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:52:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:53:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:37:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122056: incorrect info about wml package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Since I just removed a bunch of old packages from security.debian.org
I suspect this may be a useful addition to the faq:
Q: I am trying to download a package that is listed in one of the
security advisories and I get a file not found error.
A: If a newer fix is available for a package we rem
Wichert Akkerman:
> Since I just removed a bunch of old packages from security.debian.org
> I suspect this may be a useful addition to the faq:
Looks god, but:
>This prevent people from installing a package from
>security.debian.org that we know is not secure.
you do not only remove uns
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:28:59PM +0100, Kaare Olsen wrote:
> Who receive mail for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? I know that at
> least one Danish CD vendor has sent in his information a few weeks ago,
> but no new websites have been added...
They did? Who was it? I have done an update about
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 03:07:28PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> IIRC I sent a patch to Craig Small, and he answered here that he did not
> find time to commit it.
Then we were thinking of splitting up the list into 3 pages like the
Consultants.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 08:03:30PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> Since I just removed a bunch of old packages from security.debian.org
> I suspect this may be a useful addition to the faq:
>
> Q: I am trying to download a package that is listed in one of the
>security advisories and I ge
Previously peter karlsson wrote:
> you do not only remove unsecure packages, but also packages that have
> been superseded by newer versions, so perhaps that sentence should be
> slightly rephrased?
Feel free to come up with a better wording. I couldn't come up with one
I liked better and was hopi
Hi,
some output can now be produced with committed files, which can be viewed at
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/test-l10n/po/
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/test-l10n/templates/
Feedback and English fixes are welcome.
Denis
11 matches
Mail list logo
