Bug#120004: devel/website/using_cvs does not list everything needed to edit a language

2001-11-18 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 02:41:54PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Tags: patch > Modified version of patch applied so closing the bug. -- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#120004: marked as done (/devel/website/using_cvs does not list everything needed to edit a language)

2001-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2001 00:54:01 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#120004: /devel/website/using_cvs does not list everything needed to edit a language has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#119993: devel/website/using_cvs is not clear on developer access

2001-11-18 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 12:58:37PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > > http://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs#cvsfordevelopers > > This part of the page is only useful for developers in the webwml group. I > believe the section title should be changed to reflect that. >

Bug#119993: marked as done (/devel/website/using_cvs is not clear on developer access)

2001-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2001 01:08:23 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#119993: /devel/website/using_cvs is not clear on developer access has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Re: Availability of changelogs at packages.debian.org?

2001-11-18 Thread Fabrice Lorrain \(home\)
"James A. Treacy" wrote: > ... > - for efficiency the extraction script should extract the changelog.gz >changelog.debian.gz and copyright file all in one go. The copyright file is not really needed. ... > To prevent an overly large, flat directory I would suggest creating a > cache that mirr

Bug#119993: devel/website/using_cvs is not clear on developer access

2001-11-18 Thread Josip Rodin
Adam Heath wrote: > http://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs#cvsfordevelopers > > This part of the page is only useful for developers in the webwml group. I > believe the section title should be changed to reflect that. I disagree. The section describes clearly what's necessary, there's no

Processed: .

2001-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 120003 minor Bug#120003: [PATCH] fix to Makefile.common to support errors better Severity set to `minor'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by treacy: webwml/english/Bugs Makefile index.wml pkgrepo ...

2001-11-18 Thread peter karlsson
Debian WWW CVS: > Added files: > english/Bugs : pkgreport-opts.inc If this is going to be outside the translation-check system, shouldn't it be sliced and included only from the English directory? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail ac

Re: woody install manual and www.d.o/releases/woody/

2001-11-18 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, Sorry I didn't reply sooner. The network link of my primary mail host is down. Please CC: answers here. Adam wrote: > I'd like to get the woody installation manual online at > www.d.o/releases/woody/. This involves both getting that in place and > also WML revisions to the releases/woody are

Re: Error in package search CGI scripts.

2001-11-18 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, I've fixed the script and also symlinked search_packages to search_packages.pl. Thanks. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#100641: marked as done (bugs.d.o, packages.d.o: broken again for packages with + in name)

2001-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2001 14:15:27 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

distrib

2001-11-18 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, I don't believe the "distrib" directory is too useful like it is. It does contain things that relate to the distribution, but that's both ambiguous, because it can mean both Linux distribution and the act of distributing in general, and unclear, because there's stuff in there that can be name

Email of the danish web maintainer

2001-11-18 Thread Christian Precht Jensen
Hi can you please send the email of the danish maintainers of your web pages email because i found some corrections for your sites!   thanks   Christian Precht Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Email of the danish web maintainer

2001-11-18 Thread Kaare Olsen
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001 16:47:28 +0100, Christian Precht Jensen wrote: >Hi can you please send the email of the danish maintainers of your web pages >email because i found some corrections for your sites! I've replied directly to the sender. -- Regards, Kaare -

Bug#98799: marked as done (www.debian.org: add information of "How to add info to BTS")

2001-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2001 19:49:13 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Re: Availability of changelogs at packages.debian.org?

2001-11-18 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 09:55:18AM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote: > "James A. Treacy" wrote: > > > ... > > - for efficiency the extraction script should extract the changelog.gz > >changelog.debian.gz and copyright file all in one go. > The copyright file is not really needed. Maybe no

Re: Availability of changelogs at packages.debian.org?

2001-11-18 Thread Chris Tillman
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 02:58:10PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 09:55:18AM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote: > > "James A. Treacy" wrote: > > > > > ... > > > - for efficiency the extraction script should extract the changelog.gz > > >changelog.debian.gz and copyr

Re: Availability of changelogs at packages.debian.org?

2001-11-18 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 08:12:59PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > > So, you're thinking along the lines of a cgi that would initially > respond to a user's 'littledoc' request by extracting just the pieces > we want from the .tgz, and present the info to the user. And then it Any request from pack

Bug#116936: marked as done ([PATCH]: cvs.debian.org instructions confusing)

2001-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2001 14:34:50 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [PATCH]: cvs.debian.org instructions confusing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#120003: Comments

2001-11-18 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, Whether touch_translations.pl fails or not has no influence on the integrity of the .html file that wml file outputted, AFAIR. So I don't think this change is necessary. (please CC: answers) -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Re: Availability of changelogs at packages.debian.org?

2001-11-18 Thread Chris Tillman
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 03:28:16PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > It's not clear what you mean by "each server's cache". The cgi script > would be handled from one machine so only that machine would need the > cache. My guess is you believe there is a connection between the debian > web stuff and

Bug#120003: Comments

2001-11-18 Thread Adam Heath
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi, > > Whether touch_translations.pl fails or not has no influence on the integrity > of the .html file that wml file outputted, AFAIR. So I don't think this > change is necessary. If that's the case, then why have touch_translations at all? BEGIN G

[no subject]

2001-11-18 Thread E-mails do Brasil
Colocamos a sua disposição um cadastro único com até 3.000.000 (3 milhões de e-mails) filtrados e atualizados, além de cadastrar seu site em 2.700 sistemas de busca. São serviços ideais para a divulgação de seu web site, marca, produto ou serviço, afinal são milhões de internautas a apenas um

[no subject]

2001-11-18 Thread E-mails do Brasil
Colocamos a sua disposição um cadastro único com até 3.000.000 (3 milhões de e-mails) filtrados e atualizados, além de cadastrar seu site em 2.700 sistemas de busca. São serviços ideais para a divulgação de seu web site, marca, produto ou serviço, afinal são milhões de internautas a apenas um