Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-08-09
Severity: normal
Hello!
I don't manage to get any results from mailing list search.
I tried by entering only one word as a search string and
I used words which should produce results, words which I
saw at the mailinglist archives.
I've s
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 01:33:56AM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote:
> >> Hi! I just wanted to let you know that Debian Work-Needing and
> >> Prospective Packages's pages are not working now.
> >> They don't display any error. They simply don't display anylisting.
>
> > That's probably because the BTS wa
reassign 108126 listarchives
thanks
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:27:00AM +0200, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: N/A; reported 2001-08-09
> Severity: normal
>
> I don't manage to get any results from mailing list search.
>
> I tried by entering only one word as a search
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 108126 listarchives
Bug#108126: lists.debian.org/search.html does not find anything
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `listarchives'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(a
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * peter karlsson
>
> | Tollef Fog Heen:
> |
> | > What do you propose instead? Overriding the header, spitting out CSS
> | > in order to get a (or something like that) inline?
> |
> | Perhaps. Or maybe? HTML does not have any
> | notion of inline headers, so this nee
* Martin Schulze
| I have no idea what you're talking about...
How to style the DWN headers/leading/ingress properly. peterk doesn't
like , I don't like it particularly well either, so we are
discussing how to get it to be both correct (and valid) HTML, while
also being acceptable for us.
--
Debian WWW CVS:
> Modified files:
> english/security/2001: dsa-067.wml
>
> Log message:
> nitpicking.
>-We have received reports that the 'apache' http daemon, as included in
>-the Debian 'stable' distribution, is vulnerable to the 'artificially
>+We have received reports that the `apache'
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:24:34PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > english/security/2001: dsa-067.wml
> >
> > Log message:
> > nitpicking.
>
> >-We have received reports that the 'apache' http daemon, as included in
> >-the Debian 'stable' distribution, is vulnerable to th
Hi,
I figured out what's wrong with glimpse -- apparently every one of its
indices needs to be regenerated. Therefore, that is being done now. :)
Oh and there were some y2k-handling-isms in scripts/buildindex and
cgi-bin/searchlists that I fixed, too.
--
2. That which causes joy or happine
Hi,
I tough that all the Y2k issues were taken care a long time ago, what
else did you change on those files?
Bye
Cesar Mendoza
http://www.kitiara.org
--
"First they tell you, you're wrong and they can prove it;
then they tell you, you're right but it isn't important;
then they tell you, it's i
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 02:50:44PM -0500, Cesar Mendoza wrote:
> > Oh and there were some y2k-handling-isms in scripts/buildindex and
> > cgi-bin/searchlists that I fixed, too.
>
> I tough that all the Y2k issues were taken care a long time ago, what
> else did you change on those files?
I rename
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 09:33:00AM -0400, Aurelian Melinte wrote:
> here is attached a fixed check_trans for the "original" issue, a while ago.
> Could someone verify the fix is not breaking anything and eventually check
> it in
That's:
--- check_trans.pl.orig Mon Jul 30 20:51:28 2001
+++ check
At 10:31 PM 8/9/01 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 09:33:00AM -0400, Aurelian Melinte wrote:
> here is attached a fixed check_trans for the "original" issue, a while
ago.
> Could someone verify the fix is not breaking anything and eventually check
> it in
That's:
--- check_t
Josip Rodin:
> Well, ' sure isn't vertical on my font,
Console or X? My old console font had a non-vertical ', so I made my
own :-) In XFree86, ' is vertical in the xterm fonts from version 4 and
up.
> so `foo' is quite a common construct, in manual pages and everywhere.
Yeah, and it looks horr
I have just started a supportforum
i have started this forum becouse i am a system administrator and every time
i have a "small" problem and none of my collega´s could help me i am forced
you spend a lot of time seeking for the solution.
so i thought there a lot of people with the same problem he
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 10:47:33PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> > Well, ' sure isn't vertical on my font,
>
> Console or X? My old console font had a non-vertical ', so I made my
> own :-) In XFree86, ' is vertical in the xterm fonts from version 4 and
> up.
>
> > so `foo' is quite a common con
Hi,
You can now see e.g. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/
It still needs a lot of polishing, I'll get to it eventually...
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Josip Rodin:
> In my console font, it looks fine.
Most of the console fonts distributed with Debian are "broken" in this
regard.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
Your message dated Thu, 9 Aug 2001 22:55:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Thu, 9 Aug 2001 22:52:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Please read entirely before shouting :o)
One day or another we will switch to XHTML.
The main issue is with empty tags, they require a trailing slash. With
the current WML (and there is no plan to change this soon, it would
imply a deep rewriting of wml_p2_mp4h), if source files have these
trail
21 matches
Mail list logo
