* Josip Rodin
| On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 09:52:58AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > | 3) Let me reiterate that nobody but spammers needs that list anyway. An NM
| > |knows the address of their AM because they contacted him.
| >
| > No, he doesn't necessarily know that. My AM had a bug in o
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 10:20:02PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > | 3) Let me reiterate that nobody but spammers needs that list anyway. An
> NM
> | > |knows the address of their AM because they contacted him.
> | >
> | > No, he doesn't necessarily know that. My AM had a bug in one of h
Summary for Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Identity
pub 1024D/8F068012 2001-02-16 Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! 73D446C2 2001-03-03 Carey Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Philosophy & Procedures
---
Andrew understands Debian's philosophy and agrees
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 06:37:43PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> I really don't see why we have to sacfifice usability for a minor and
> overly flashy thing like vertical titles. They could just as easily be
> made horizontal without affecting the look.
I've done that now. IMO it doesn't have the same
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
Priority: normal
Current Debian www page contains the most recent version of
the Debian policy. For developers, it is completely OK, but since
debian policy contains various information(or guidance) for
system administrator (especially in Operating system secti
Josip Rodin:
> It's also worth mentioning that the new page is completely valid HTML, it
> doesn't use one bit of new web stuff (CSS, DHTML, whatever).
That's part of the problem, instead of using HTML to what it was
designed for, and put the fancy formatting into CSS, you try to
simulate it by d
>> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's also worth mentioning that the new page is completely valid
> HTML, it doesn't use one bit of new web stuff (CSS, DHTML, whatever).
CSS is *good*. It lets you achieve your v i s u a l t r i c k s
(looks awful, doesn't it?) without forcing H
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 05:33:56PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > It's also worth mentioning that the new page is completely valid
> > HTML, it doesn't use one bit of new web stuff (CSS, DHTML, whatever).
>
> CSS is *good*. It lets you achieve your v i s u a l t r i c k s
> (looks aw
* Josip Rodin
| On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 05:33:56PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
| > without forcing HTML into a presentation language. The only problem with
| > CSS is the sorry support Netscape has for it.
Netscape 4.x doesn't support CSS, it supports JSS (Javascript
stylesheets), but it
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 05:07:21PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> That's part of the problem, instead of using HTML to what it was
> designed for, and put the fancy formatting into CSS, you try to
> simulate it by doing it in HTML with tables and stuff. Yes, tables are
> perfectly valid HTML, but w
Ok, I've sent two users in the passwd file and more will surely
follow. In any case I think that it might be useful to restrict access to
only the 'spanish' directory to some users, call me paranoid.
How can this be limited?
Javi
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:38:45PM -0800,
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 07:41:47PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > Both CSS and HTML is made to degrade gracefully, that is, if somebody
> > uses a browser without CSS support, he'll still see the content, but
> > it won't look the way the web page's author intended.
You can _never_ expect it
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 07:16:25PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > without forcing HTML into a presentation language. The only problem with
> > CSS is the sorry support Netscape has for it.
>
> Errr, what about lynx, links or w3m? Last I checked they didn't support it,
> either. So you'd have to m
Josip Rodin wrote:
> I've done that now. IMO it doesn't have the same effect as the horizontal,
> but anyway...
Thank you.
Of course, most screen readers will probably read the titles one single
character at a time now, since they are broken up at character
boundries: "Double-you owe are kay I en
>> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > CSS is *good*. It lets you achieve your v i s u a l t r i c k s
> > (looks awful, doesn't it?)
>
> It doesn't. :)
It does. Unless used with fonts that are designed for it, changing the
default kerning often confuses the reader. It works
15 matches
Mail list logo
