Package: www.debian.org
Version: 2000-10-24
The header of the HTTP request contains an incorrect character set
identifier, which makes the pages show up incorrect in some browsers:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:43:15 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) Debian/GNU
Cache-Control: max-age=86
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 08:38:10PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > That's 36 minutes -- for rebuilding the whole site plus running
> > > touch_translations.pl on english pages. Simply fantastic! :)
>
> > Excellent. Can we have hourly builds now?
>
> See if VA will donate a second CPU and I d
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 09:46:31AM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: 2000-10-24
>
> The header of the HTTP request contains an incorrect character set
> identifier, which makes the pages show up incorrect in some browsers:
>
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8
What's up with the links to the searching page translations?
How do you imagine to work out the content negotion with the php script?
Viktor Nagy
Ebm9b5b: Eb Gb | Db Fb Bbb
1 10 7b 9b 5b
Previously Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The usual common entry points (debian.org and www.debian.org) have been
> resetup to be redirects to this domain, and in future I encourage the
> above to be used as the cannonical name.
Euhm, thanks for not announcing that. So will I put the bugscan output now
>
> See if VA will donate a second CPU and I don't see why not.. AFAIK that
> board is SMP capable, just needs the chip. Then as long as there is
> reasonable atomic site wide updates there isn't any particular reason not
> to run it more frequently.
>
it is a dual board, there is a dummy cpu in
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
The Documentation page contains a link to the Linux HOWTO's which no
longer works. It points to http://www.linux.org/help/howto.html . The
Linux Documentation Project HOWTO information is available at
http://www.linuxdoc.org/docs.html#howto .
Also, it appear
Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> >Has the www.d.o moved to new machine? All chinese webpage displayed as
> > unknow coding. :(
> > Yu Guanghui
>
> I suspect 'AddCharset' directive for Apache is responsible, since
> not only Chinese bu
Your message dated Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:48:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#75490: broken links on http://www.debian.org/doc/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 02:47:33AM +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> > >Has the www.d.o moved to new machine? All chinese webpage displayed
> > > as unknow coding. :(
> >
> > I suspect 'AddCharset' directive for Apache is responsible, since
> > not only Chinese but also Japanese (ISO-2022-JP), Kore
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
The main web page contains a link to http://www.debian.org/sponsor.html
. Visiting this link yields a 404 Not Found.
gecko23:~$ wget http://www.debian.org/sponsor.html
--11:01:44-- http://www.debian.org:80/sponsor.html
=> `sponsor.html'
Connecting
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
The Debian-user Faq-O-Matic is broken. According to
http://www.debian.org/doc/, it is located at
http://www.debian.org/cgi-bin/fom . Unfortunately, this is a broken
URL. On http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#faqomatic , its URL is
given as http://www.deb
Your message dated Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:34:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#75493: http://www.debian.org/sponsor.html is broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Admins, please synchronize the main Apache configuration files on
> klecker.d.o with the ones from master.d.o.
Er.. no.. Please put any settings you need in the apache.conf for the web
site. I don't want to have to repeat this if we ever move things arou
On 23 Oct 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > If you have something very very important and irreplacable you may ask
> > Joey Hess to try and recover it for you..
> Does this mean that backups were not part of the regular
> administration of the machine? It's reasonable for some applications
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 12:42:41PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Admins, please synchronize the main Apache configuration files on
> > klecker.d.o with the ones from master.d.o.
>
> Er.. no.. Please put any settings you need in the apache.conf for the web
> site. I don't want to have to repeat
Josip Rodin:
> Do you know what Apache setting is needed to do this?
Unfortunately not, but it didn't use to do that (send an incorrect
charset). Perhaps it didn't send any at all, but at least it didn't
send an incorrect one (I've been using debian.org for test cases, and
it suddenly stopped wor
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 07:31:04PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
> > Do you know what Apache setting is needed to do this?
>
> Unfortunately not, but it didn't use to do that (send an incorrect
> charset). Perhaps it didn't send any at all, but at least it didn't
> send an incorrect one (I've been
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 01:51:13PM +0200, NAGY Viktor wrote:
> What's up with the links to the searching page translations?
I assume you mean the links down the bottom.
The follow the html pages, when they should be calling the php links
I'm trying to see how to fix it.
> How do you imagine to wo
Josip Rodin:
> This has been resolved in another thread in the meantime, I think the
> charset is correct now -- please test.
Well, at least it is better (it doesn't send any charset in the HTTP
header now).
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:13:56PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote:
[Apache sending incorrect default charset in the headers]
> > This has been resolved in another thread in the meantime, I think the
> > charset is correct now -- please test.
>
> Well, at least it is better (it doesn't send any charse
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 72505 listarchives
Bug#72505: Search returns wrong url
Bug reassigned from package `lists.debian.org' to `listarchives'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 47925 listarchives
Bug#47925: www.debian.org: debian-bugs-dist missing from list archives page
Bug reassigned from package `lists.debian.org' to `listarchives'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Dar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 32715 listarchives
Bug#32715: www.debian.org: debian-vote not archived
Bug reassigned from package `lists.debian.org' to `listarchives'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, D
Your message dated Tue, 24 Oct 2000 23:14:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Tue, 24 Oct 2000 23:11:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Josip Rodin wrote:
> That was my original opinion, but hey, it's only ~40% of klecker.d.o's 46GB,
> and I don't know what else would need more space than what would be left...
Gotta love raid-5'd debian mirrors. :-P
--
see shy jo
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 23 Oct 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> > > If you have something very very important and irreplacable you may ask
> > > Joey Hess to try and recover it for you..
>
> > Does this mean that backups were not part of the regular
> > administrati
Hi, several folks (including myself) are having difficulty in searching
the LSB mailing list archives lsb-discuss and lsb-spec. I'm not sure if
the other LSB lists are having problems, however, as I am not on them and
I'm not sure what should be there.
When I do a search for "rpm" on the list "ls
29 matches
Mail list logo
