> I regenerated the distribution comparison page. They
>are updated for potato, and include pages for four architectures.
> You can find them at ~/lapeyre/public_html/reports on master.
>They should be a drop in replacement for those currently installed.
Debian web-master, if we could just
Please update SPI/donations.wml with respect to IRS 501(c)3 status.
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, James A. Treacy wrote:
> then don't worry about it.
>
> > > Looking into http://localhost/events/1999/0918-mednet
> > > http://localhost/events/1999/mednetemail.txt : error 404 Not Found
> >
> > Fixed this yesturday. The file disappeared from the server. I called
> > Scu
Why not make it part of the wml system?
On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 07:13:07PM -0500, A. P. Harris wrote:
>
> > I regenerated the distribution comparison page. They
> >are updated for potato, and include pages for four architectures.
> > You can find them at ~/lapeyre/public_html/reports on ma
OK... next web update
On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 02:12:10AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Please update SPI/donations.wml with respect to IRS 501(c)3 status.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Please cc a
*Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Why not make it part of the wml system?
>
> > > I regenerated the distribution comparison page. They
> > >are updated for potato, and include pages for four architectures.
> > > You can find them at ~/lapeyre/public_html/reports on master.
> > >They should be a dr
*Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Why not make it part of the wml system?
> >
> > > I regenerated the distribution comparison page. They
> > >are updated for potato, and include pages for four architectures.
> > > You can find them at ~/lapeyre/public_html/reports on master.
> > >They should be a
>I don't know anything about wml. What does it mean ?
Please see http://www.debian.org/devel/HOWTO_work.on.website
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
When answering to mailing list or news posting, please do not Cc me
personally. Thanks.
I'm maintaining scwm; Greg Badros, an upstream author, contacted me about
the page http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pa/lscwm.html. This page is a bit
misleading:
"Maintainer for scwm is Francesco Tapparo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. "
He would like better something as:
"Scwm is written by Greg J. Badros and
On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 02:51:54PM +0200, Francesco Tapparo wrote:
> I'm maintaining scwm; Greg Badros, an upstream author, contacted me about
> the page http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pa/lscwm.html. This page is a bit
> misleading:
>
> "Maintainer for scwm is Francesco Tapparo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 02:51:54PM +0200, Francesco Tapparo wrote:
> I'm maintaining scwm; Greg Badros, an upstream author, contacted me about
> the page http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pa/lscwm.html. This page is a bit
> misleading:
>
> "Maintainer for scwm is Francesco Tapparo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
*Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Why not make it part of the wml system?
I looked at the cover page for wml. I am not sure wether it is
well suited. Probably yes. The pages are mostly very long lists.
They are generated by overly-complicated perl scripts. The links
at top and bottom could be standa
On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 07:13:07PM -0500, A. P. Harris wrote:
>
> Debian web-master, if we could just give ownership of a directory,
> say, /releases/{slink,potato}/reports to John, I would
> appreciate it and John would.
>
Is it ok if we give John CVS access? He can then check in all the
files h
13 matches
Mail list logo
