Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 09:42:54PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > > I saw... color wise, I already like 5 better and it's not even done > > loading. > > And I didn't even announce it yet =8) I'm a snoop :) > The problem with the logo is that it is portait shaped, which makes the > buttons look st

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread peter karlsson
> I saw... color wise, I already like 5 better and it's not even done > loading. And I didn't even announce it yet =8) The problem with the logo is that it is portait shaped, which makes the buttons look strange if only they are on the right of it. -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 09:15:39PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > Hmmm, separating the tables and adding back the "GNU/Linux" stuff (and > mentioning Hurd in the same place): > > http://www.softwolves.pp.se/tmp/debian4.html> I saw... color wise, I already like 5 better and it's not even done loadi

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 08:52:01PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > > My only comments are that the horizontal and vertical bars should be > > different > > colors > > Personally, I liked it better when they were all the same colour... :) > > > and that there will be complaints if we remove the G

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread peter karlsson
> Blech. I've changed my mind: just use Debian by itself. To late =8) -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ When answering to mailing list or news posting, please do not Cc me personally. Thanks.

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread peter karlsson
> Hmm... I didn't like the length of time it took for this page to load... > what I mean is not bandwidth issues, directly.. but the "whole page in one > table" concept. Yeah, I know. Hmmm, separating the tables and adding back the "GNU/Linux" stuff (and mentioning Hurd in the same place): http

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread James A. Treacy
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 08:52:01PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > > My only comments are that the horizontal and vertical bars should be > > different > > colors > > Personally, I liked it better when they were all the same colour... :) > C'est la vie. > > and that there will be complaints if

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread peter karlsson
> My only comments are that the horizontal and vertical bars should be different > colors Personally, I liked it better when they were all the same colour... :) > and that there will be complaints if we remove the GNU/Linux part of our > name. My reasoning for removing the "GNU/Linux" thing in

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread James A. Treacy
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 07:27:50PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > > My biggest concern with the current official website is the excessive clash > > between the blue and read in the header linkbar -- I find it makes the site > > look slightly less professional, and while that's not so much of a conc

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 07:27:50PM +0200, peter karlsson wrote: > > My biggest concern with the current official website is the excessive clash > > between the blue and read in the header linkbar -- I find it makes the site > > look slightly less professional, and while that's not so much of a conc

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread peter karlsson
> My biggest concern with the current official website is the excessive clash > between the blue and read in the header linkbar -- I find it makes the site > look slightly less professional, and while that's not so much of a concern > for us developers, I think we should always concentrate on putti

Re: website & the new logo

1999-06-25 Thread Ed Boraas
>Thanks for the offer :) The new look is simple as changing one or two >include files... but how about a comment or three? > >http://www.benham.net/debian.org/sample[1|2|3|4|5].html > >2 and 3 were plays with color schemes.. the fonts for #2 would have to >change to something darker... Personally