Re: webmirror.wml diff

* Jutta Wrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-15 10:30]: > Am 14.02.2006 um 23:37 schrieb Gerfried Fuchs: >> Should we supress the addition of width="102" height="60" to the HTML >> output? > > Please do not remove the size! It is needed to display the image > correctly and the browser will try to

Re: webmirror.wml diff

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 14.02.2006 um 23:37 schrieb Gerfried Fuchs: Should we supress the addition of width="102" height="60" to the HTML output? Please do not remove the size! It is needed to display the image correctly and the browser will try to calculate the s

Re: webmirror.wml diff

On Tuesday 14 February 2006 23:37, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Should we supress the addition of width="102" height="60" to the HTML > output? Shall we remove/rename english/sponsor_img.jpg? It isn't really > possible for sponsors to use different sizes than 102x60 for their > logos in the current sta

webmirror.wml diff

Hi! I think about committing the attached patch to address the real size of the english/sponsor_img.jpg file (it's 102, not 120), because the resulting html page will have the size fixed in it. I also think about removing the word "suggested" from the english file (in a different commit o