On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:49:24PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> In future, it would be nice to maybe re-think what we put on which
> CDs. Some people have suggested having a separate CD for docs, which
> I'll admit I'm not such a fan of for a variety of reasons. I'm tempted
> to suggest that we m
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:57 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > On Mon Feb 07, 2011 at 23:04:05 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > Are you talking about this for squeeze 6.0.1?
> >
> > might be an option. Added d-release@ and d-cd@ to CC for that
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:57 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Mon Feb 07, 2011 at 23:04:05 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Are you talking about this for squeeze 6.0.1?
>
> might be an option. Added d-release@ and d-cd@ to CC for that reason.
> [ to put them into the loop: we are currently discus
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:57:43PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Mon Feb 07, 2011 at 23:04:05 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> "Debian FAQ" is DDP document still in debiandoc-sgml.
>>
>> With upcoming version of debiandoc-sgml (1.2.20+), XML conversion should
>> be in good shape. I will
Hi,
On Mon Feb 07, 2011 at 23:04:05 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> "Debian FAQ" is DDP document still in debiandoc-sgml.
>
> With upcoming version of debiandoc-sgml (1.2.20+), XML conversion should
> be in good shape. I will hold off such conversion. Then *theming* will
> be in better shape if you
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:32:34AM +0100, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> On 7 February 2011 06:41, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> > Seems like having the XSL emit the same wrapper HTML wouldn't be terribly
> > hard. Where do the build scripts for that live (revision control)?
>
> The DDP conten
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:18:36PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
...
> related to this, but completly unrelated to the content, David and me
> thought it might be a good idea, to have the content of some of the
> documentation also rendered with the Debian website theme.
Sure.
> Dev-ref,
On 7 February 2011 06:41, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> Seems like having the XSL emit the same wrapper HTML wouldn't be terribly
> hard. Where do the build scripts for that live (revision control)?
The DDP content is generated through Makefiles and scripts living at
'svn://svn.debian.org/ddp/manuals/t
Seems like having the XSL emit the same wrapper HTML wouldn't be
terribly hard. Where do the build scripts for that live (revision control)?
On 02/06/2011 04:04 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Sun Feb 06, 2011 at 22:40:32 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011
Hi,
On Sun Feb 06, 2011 at 22:40:32 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:18:36PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Do you guys (from d-doc) see any possibility to help us with that?
>
> Most of the documentation nowadays is built using Docbook although som
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:18:36PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Do you guys (from d-doc) see any possibility to help us with that?
Most of the documentation nowadays is built using Docbook although some
documents are still based on debiandoc-SGML. In any case, how can we help
you?
Regards
Hi,
On Sun Feb 06, 2011 at 22:02:33 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is great to have squeeze released and web pages in the new design.
>
> It is not secret that Debian documentation pages can be reorganized to
> make more important things to be more accessible. I would like to
> update t
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 01:44:02PM +, Justin B Rye wrote:
...
> ...and so on, but this is getting a bit much for the morning after a
> Release Party... Could we organise some way of getting the webpages
> passed through a longer-term debian-l10n-english review?
Most of the points raised exist
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 04:37:45PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:02:33PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It is great to have squeeze released and web pages in the new design.
> >
> > It is not secret that Debian documentation pages can be
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:02:33PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is great to have squeeze released and web pages in the new design.
>
> It is not secret that Debian documentation pages can be reorganized to
> make more important things to be more accessible. I would like to
> update thei
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I attach proposed change as files:
> index.wml
> ddp.wml
> obsolete.wml
>
> If no one object, I will commit them to english/doc directory.
It does have one or two non-native-speakerisms, the most glaring being:
>href="http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/
Hi,
It is great to have squeeze released and web pages in the new design.
It is not secret that Debian documentation pages can be reorganized to
make more important things to be more accessible. I would like to
update their content, now.
Key actions(first phase):
== http://www.debian.org/doc/
17 matches
Mail list logo
