Wichert Akkerman said:
> I think we need to revamp the Y2K page; the list that is currently has
> is IMHO almost useless; I suggest replacing it with the list of Y2k
> updates that have been included in 2.1r4 and a link to the GNU Y2K page.
It hasn't been useless because it has sto
I think we need to revamp the Y2K page; the list that is currently has
is IMHO almost useless; I suggest replacing it with the list of Y2k
updates that have been included in 2.1r4 and a link to the GNU Y2K page.
Wichert
Previously James A. Treacy wrote:
> Let's hear what they are proposing and then decide. For example,
> many people would object to the use of a non-free product.
They'll set it up this week so you can give it a try.
Wichert.
--
_
Previously James A. Treacy wrote:
> Let's hear what they are proposing and then decide. For example,
> many people would object to the use of a non-free product.
Debian package running on a Debian server. I think using ht:dig iirc.
Wichert.
--
_
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 02:33:10AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> This apparently got buried in the thread but it's important...
>
> Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On a related note: Cistron (the people hosting www.nl.debian.org)
> > appears to be willing to setup a searchengin
This apparently got buried in the thread but it's important...
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On a related note: Cistron (the people hosting www.nl.debian.org)
> appears to be willing to setup a searchengine for the website. Is
> there any interest in this?
I think this would be
On Sat, Oct 16, 1999 at 08:57:43PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Are we talking about the same page?
>
> scooter$ lynx -source http://www.debian.org/y2k/index.html | grep -i option
The subject is links to that page, not links from that page.
I gotta run though (plane to catch).
--
Raul
Raul Miller said:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:11:34AM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > Anyone care to spend a little time looking into some reorganization?
> > We need to make sure that information is organized so that it is
> > easy to find.
>
> I've been playing around with it a bit -- not sur
Ugh, I have no idea why this got sent to this email address, anyway..
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> About the list: dialog doesn't handle dates, so it's safe. Same for
> base-passwd, base-files, hostname, dpkg and e2fsprogs. (the only dates dealt
> with are time_t's, not ASCII stuff).
I'll change tha
> is there some html standard that talks about tags?
They are obviously in HTML 4.0, since validator.w3.org doesn't complain on
that.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
- and God said: nohup make World >& World.log &
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:11:34AM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> Anyone care to spend a little time looking into some reorganization?
> We need to make sure that information is organized so that it is
> easy to find.
I've been playing around with it a bit -- not sure I'm going to come
up with an
Previously James A. Treacy wrote:
> We thought it was important enough that a link is right on the
> main page. Scroll down a page and you'll see it.
Duh! We completely missed that.
On a related note: Cistron (the people hosting www.nl.debian.org)
appears to be willing to setup a searchengine for
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 02:49:34PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> I just had somebody ask me if there was any y2k-info for Debian.. a quick
> search of the site revealed absolutely nothing..
>
> Some looking around on va produce http://www.debian.org/y2k/, which has
> some info but seems real
I just had somebody ask me if there was any y2k-info for Debian.. a quick
search of the site revealed absolutely nothing..
Some looking around on va produce http://www.debian.org/y2k/, which has
some info but seems really incomplete.
Is that page still intended to be our y2k-page, and if so why
14 matches
Mail list logo
