Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2023 22:22:27 +0200
with message-id <25884.30723.856993.712...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #926405,
regarding www.debian.org: Debian logos - PDF conversion is pixelated
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi dear hop you are fine please send me all information in a PDF form kindly
Now it works. Thank you.
2020년 6월 4일 (목) 23:12, Holger Wansing 님이 작성:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2020 schrieb sebul:
> > Hello.
> > I get an error message "Page not found"
> > when I click Korean [PDF] at
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals.en.htm
Am Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2020 schrieb sebul:
> Hello.
> I get an error message "Page not found"
> when I click Korean [PDF] at
> https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals.en.html#refcard
> How can solve this problem?
Please stop this.
Korean PDF cannot be seen on the websit
Hello.
I get an error message "Page not found"
when I click Korean [PDF] at
https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals.en.html#refcard
How can solve this problem?
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
I've found a problem when I convert the Debian logos to PDF format in Buster.
The render is pixelated.
If you want convert the logo to PDF format:
rsvg-convert -f p
Hello Carsten,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 06:21:07PM +0100, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Am 17.03.19 um 16:38 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> > Sorry, I don't understand the rationale. The source is still missing.
> > What ist the resolution? Or did I miss a policy that bugs get closed
> > if they are too o
Hello Helge,
Am 17.03.19 um 16:38 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> Sorry, I don't understand the rationale. The source is still missing.
> What ist the resolution? Or did I miss a policy that bugs get closed
> if they are too old?
the source isn't missing as Andreas has pointed out and at all the
sour
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:11:58 +0100
with message-id <20190317131158.ga18...@x260.cruise.homelinux.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#515814: www.debian.org: Please provide source for
pdf-graphics in devel/debian-med/News/2009/20090214.wml
has caused the Debian Bug report #
ordered by arch and txt pdf html
>
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/releasenotes
> shows the release notes available ordered by arch and pdf html txt
>
> https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/releasenotes not yet available
>
> All those pages are built using th
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:48:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by dmn fixes #880201
has caused the Debian Bug report #880201,
regarding www.debian.org: Release notes formats (html, pdf, txt) are shown in
different order for each release
to be marked as
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
The order of the formats in releases notes is different for every release:
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/releasenotes
shows the release notes available ordered by arch and txt pdf html
https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/releasenotes
shows
fonts-vlgothic,
> > + fonts-wqy-microhei
>
> I wonder the reason of these font choices for PDF.
>
> texlive-lang-japanese uses IPA produced fonts.
> texlive-lang-chinese uses fonts-arphic-* fonts.
>
> Why build with these? I kept these but add
AL := debian-reference
# This can list more than debian/rules for translator to check the result
LANGPO := ja fr it pt de zh-cn zh-tw es
# languages to skip generation of PDF files (not used now)
-NOPDF := ja fr it pt de es
+NOPDF :=
# languages to build document
LANGALL = en $(LANGPO)
Control: tags -1 + patch
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Paul Wise wrote:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/
> >
> > I don't think there is a copy of the Debian Reference in PDF or
> > one-page HTML formats, if you would like to have those, please
On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 10:43 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > So, could this bug now be planned to be fixed in 8.4?
>
> I forgot to add - even if we do *NOT* want to fix dvipdfmx, there is
> an easy way around, do not use type1 but otf/ttf fonts.
>
> I have advised this to the Russian reporter a
Hi Holger,
> the machine www- master, which builds the release-notes, is running
> Jessie (at least for some months, until DSA has upgraded all machines
> to Stretch), and when the release-notes trunk was not fixed before, the
> pdfs are crippled again.
Ahh --- I see. Sorry for the noise, I d
Hi Norbert,
Am Mi. Feb. 24 01:08:41 2016 GMT+0100 schrieb Norbert Preining:
> Hi Holger,
>
> >Beside this, the same bug has to be fixed in the trunk branch of
> >release-notes as well, to make sure the problem does not re-occur after
> >the release of Stretch.
>
> As I wrote in my last email, t
Hi Holger,
>Beside this, the same bug has to be fixed in the trunk branch of
>release-notes as well, to make sure the problem does not re-occur after
>the release of Stretch.
As I wrote in my last email, this is not the case in unstable or testing, as
dvipdfmx has been fixed, as well as the fon
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 14:45:17 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> > Hi Julien,
> >
> > > > > provide a patch against the release notes, I'd happily apply that.
> > > >
> > > > Sure enough, can you please tell me where to get the sources that
> >
> > Here we go.
>
Hi Julien,
> Thanks! I've applied your variant2 patch and installed fonts-sil-charis
> on www-master.
Ok, not optimal, but not too bad. Maybe we should discuss proper font
selection before the next release.
If there are any further problems, please don't hesitate to contact me!
All the best
N
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 14:45:17 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> > > > provide a patch against the release notes, I'd happily apply that.
> > >
> > > Sure enough, can you please tell me where to get the sources that
>
> Here we go.
>
> There are several options - both boil down
Hi Julien,
> > > provide a patch against the release notes, I'd happily apply that.
> >
> > Sure enough, can you please tell me where to get the sources that
Here we go.
There are several options - both boil down to changing the fonts to
opentype/truetype fonts. In all cases
--param=xe
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 21:53:00 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> > Hi Julien,
> >
> > > That sounds like a reasonable workaround to me. Even better if you can
> > > provide a patch against the release notes, I'd happily apply that.
> >
> > Sure enough, can you p
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 21:53:00 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> > That sounds like a reasonable workaround to me. Even better if you can
> > provide a patch against the release notes, I'd happily apply that.
>
> Sure enough, can you please tell me where to get the sources that
Hi Julien,
> That sounds like a reasonable workaround to me. Even better if you can
> provide a patch against the release notes, I'd happily apply that.
Sure enough, can you please tell me where to get the sources that
are responsible for the build of the broken release notes on
Debian/stable?
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:43:38 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > So, could this bug now be planned to be fixed in 8.4?
>
> I forgot to add - even if we do *NOT* want to fix dvipdfmx, there is
> an easy way around, do not use type1 but otf/ttf fonts.
>
> I have advised this to the Russian repo
> So, could this bug now be planned to be fixed in 8.4?
I forgot to add - even if we do *NOT* want to fix dvipdfmx, there is
an easy way around, do not use type1 but otf/ttf fonts.
I have advised this to the Russian reporter and done it myself
for all release notes. It is damned easy to choose a
Hi Adam,
> I have to admit that I'm not really keen on approving an update which
> consists of "add this tar to the source package". I'm also still not
Understandable.
> sure why the suggestion is to add the changes via such a binary update
> rather than a patch - I appreciate that the changes m
On Sat, 2016-02-13 at 10:45 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Hi everyone, esp release managers
> >
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787759
> >
> > There are two bugs, one is the broken fonts, one is the
> > broken dvipdfmx for t1 fonts.
[
Hi,
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi everyone, esp release managers
>
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787759
>
> There are two bugs, one is the broken fonts, one is the
> broken dvipdfmx for t1 fonts.
>
> > This mail made me think about the status of this ...
>
> I asked rel
Hi everyone, esp release managers
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787759
There are two bugs, one is the broken fonts, one is the
broken dvipdfmx for t1 fonts.
> This mail made me think about the status of this ...
I asked release managers quite some time ago:
https://lists.d
Hi,
"Alan D. Salewski" wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> While browsing the "Debian 8 -- Release Notes" page[0] I found that the
> PDF file referenced[1] from the "English" link for the "64-bit PC
> (amd64)" architecture is not actually an English lan
Hi Folks,
While browsing the "Debian 8 -- Release Notes" page[0] I found that the
PDF file referenced[1] from the "English" link for the "64-bit PC
(amd64)" architecture is not actually an English language document.
That lead me to click around a bit more, and it s
Hello,
2015-07-20 10:38 GMT+02:00 Archer Chang :
> As the title. Seems there is something wrong with the English PDF format.
> It looks like German.
Yes, there is a problem with the title of the pdf and chapter titles.
It's not german sentences, I don't think it's a real
Hi Sir,
As the title. Seems there is something wrong with the English PDF format.
<http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/developers-reference.en.pdf>
It looks like German
<http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/developers-reference.de.pdf>
.
Reg
Dear Sir or Madam,
on https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/releasenotes
the PDF version are broken. Alle Headlines are scrumbled - the text
itself seems to be ok.
Example: 64-Bit-PC (AMD64) german, english and version PDF version See:
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/amd64/release
Hi,
David Bentley wrote:
> For example try accessing the notes for amd64 in english in a web browswer
> and most headings are corrupt and if downloaded and viewed offline the same
> is true
This has already been reported, see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2015/06/msg3.html
and follo
For example try accessing the notes for amd64 in english in a web browswer and
most headings are corrupt and if downloaded and viewed offline the same is true
Hi,
The PDF versions of the Debian Open Use logo, at
https://www.debian.org/logos/ , have a small logo centered on a large
page. That isn't a very useful format for embedding or using as part of
other documents (for instance, with PDFLaTeX and \includegraphics). The
Encapsulated PostScrip
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Imran Chaudhry wrote:
> Is the debian-history maintainer the right guy for that?
Once you've figured out how to enable it without brokenness, yes mail the bug.
> To re-enable there is talk of "add the following to
> build-dependencies":
> http://bugs.debian.org/c
Is the debian-history maintainer the right guy for that?
To re-enable there is talk of "add the following to
build-dependencies":
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579955#5
On 21 April 2013 11:54, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Imran Chaudhry wrote:
>
>> I did
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Imran Chaudhry wrote:
> I did so using reportbug and discovered that it is a known bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579955&archived=False&mbox=no
>
> Looks like building the Korean docs has been disabled but the links remain.
Could you try e
that these are generated by
>> some automagical process.
>
> They are copied from the debian-history package, not part of webwml.
>
>> I thought it best to report them here rather than patching the wml to
>> remove the PS & PDF links.
>
> Please report a bug agains
automagical process.
They are copied from the debian-history package, not part of webwml.
> I thought it best to report them here rather than patching the wml to
> remove the PS & PDF links.
Please report a bug against the debian-history package:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
--
atching the wml to
remove the PS & PDF links.
Thanks
--
GPG Key fingerprint = EF78 310C C517 9564 9ECA 82F6 68FA E621 17E1 5D16
http://about.me/imranchaudhry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: OpenPGP.js v.1.20121007
Comment: http://openpgpjs.org
wsFcBAEBAgAQBQJRctybCRBo+uYhF+FdFgAATpkP/
Hi,
> On 23 August 2012 00:13, David Prévot wrote:
>> Found a workaround for half of the issue: PDF for es, pt and pt_BR are
>> back. More investigation is needed to fix cs, ru and sk…
Thanks to DSA, the move to Wheezy allowed us to use the xetex backend,
allowing to build
ding issue, probably related to the (assumed)
> > default encoding for some language, and the text automatically added for
> > some language; e.g. Apéndice in Spanish:
>
> Found a workaround for half of the issue: PDF for es, pt and pt_BR are
> back. More investigation is needed t
some language, and the text automatically added for
> some language; e.g. Apéndice in Spanish:
Found a workaround for half of the issue: PDF for es, pt and pt_BR are
back. More investigation is needed to fix cs, ru and sk…
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
age; e.g. Apéndice in Spanish:
$ make pdf LINGUA=es architecture=all
[…]
stdin.out:81: Missing number, treated as zero.
stdin.out:81: leading text: ...tualizar su sistema squeeze}{Ap�ndice.a.A}
stdin.out:81: TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [grouping levels=255].
stdin.out:81: leading text: ...tualizar su
nd make www-master use those (some
> kind of override of the general stable builds).
>
> Regards
>
> Javier
>
> El 13/04/2012 18:42, "David Prévot" escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le 13/04/2012 10:50, Ricardo a écrit :
>
>
> > In the web http://www.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 14/04/2012 07:31, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino a écrit :
> I will try to review the issues and see what's wrong with the build.
Thanks!
> However, if build in unstable is working fine, wouldn't it be best to have
> a way to build documents in
13/04/2012 18:42, "David Prévot" escribió:
Hi,
Le 13/04/2012 10:50, Ricardo a écrit :
> In the web http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/releasenotes, all in
> Spanish pdf files are bro...
Thanks for mentioning it. Actually the following languages had been
disabled this summer b
Hi,
Le 13/04/2012 10:50, Ricardo a écrit :
> In the web http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/releasenotes, all in
> Spanish pdf files are broken.
Thanks for mentioning it. Actually the following languages had been
disabled this summer because the build failed on Squeeze:
cs es
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 05:29:31AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > >> [1] devel/debian-med/News/2009/authorstat_med.pdf
The creation of this pdf is based on the content of a database.
It is not possible to include this into the Makefile to create
translated WML pages.
> > &
> > Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 20:20 +0100 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> >> Package: www.debian.org
> >> Severity: wishlist
> >>
> >> devel/debian-med/News/2009/20090214.wml introduced the new concept of
> >> using pdf files[1] for graphic
tzmann:
>> Package: www.debian.org
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> devel/debian-med/News/2009/20090214.wml introduced the new concept of
>> using pdf files[1] for graphics. Could you please provide the source and
>> the makefile logic that localized version can be provided
Package: debian-history
Version: 2.11
In the context of making available project history from
http://www.debian.org/doc/misc-manuals#history it appears the package
doesn't build Japanese and Korean PDF and PS.
/usr/share/doc/debian-history/ja/project-history.ja.pdf.gz
/usr/share/doc/d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 574353 debiandoc-sgml
Bug #574353 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Debian New Maintainers Guide PDF
renders incorrectly
Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'debiandoc-sgml'.
> tag 574353 +confir
reassign 574353 debiandoc-sgml
tag 574353 +confirmed
thanks
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:53:43PM +0100, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
> The Debian New Maintainers guide PDF renders incorrectly -
> It shows =1sp where it is supposed to show ` - See
> http://www.gusnan.se/debian/evince_pr
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
The Debian New Maintainers guide PDF renders incorrectly -
It shows =1sp where it is supposed to show ` - See
http://www.gusnan.se/debian/evince_problem.jpg
for an example -
My example shows it in the Evince viewer, but it is reported to be the same on
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:29:16AM +0200, Carlos Sancho wrote:
> the spanish pdf document for intelx86 in
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual gives me a problem.
> It returns a nonsense of numbers and letters. I could find it here
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/1
Hi,
the spanish pdf document for intelx86 in
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual gives me a problem.
It returns a nonsense of numbers and letters. I could find it here
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14056109/Guia-de-Instalacion-Debian-Lenny-50
Thanks,
Carlos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 522427 www.debian.org
Bug#522427: dblatex missing on www-master
Bug reassigned from package `release-notes' to `www.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
ed/News/2009/20090214.wml introduced the new concept of
> using pdf files[1] for graphics. Could you please provide the source and
> the makefile logic that localized version can be provided as well?
>
> Thanks
>
> [1] devel/debian-med/News/2009/authorstat_med.pdf
> devel/
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
devel/debian-med/News/2009/20090214.wml introduced the new concept of
using pdf files[1] for graphics. Could you please provide the source and
the makefile logic that localized version can be provided as well?
Thanks
[1] devel/debian-med/News/2009
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 06:53:49AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 10:22:35AM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > On 2009-02-13 12:33, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > > > We have to make sure, that somebody cleans the release notes
> > > > directory once, so that no cruft gets on the CD im
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 10:22:35AM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2009-02-13 12:33, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > > We have to make sure, that somebody cleans the release notes
> > > directory once, so that no cruft gets on the CD images.
> >
> > What's required? Removing */release-notes*?
>
> Yes,
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 10:22:35AM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2009-02-13 12:33, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > > We have to make sure, that somebody cleans the release notes
> > > directory once, so that no cruft gets on the CD images.
> >
> > What's required? Removing */release-notes*?
>
> Yes,
On 2009-02-13 12:33, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > We have to make sure, that somebody cleans the release notes
> > directory once, so that no cruft gets on the CD images.
>
> What's required? Removing */release-notes*?
Yes, this should do it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debia
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:30:04PM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2009-02-13 19:28, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > Zitat von "Jens Seidel" :
> >> Current dblatex solution is not so ugly ...
> >
> > Good!
>
> Hey, it looks excellent, nearly like the other dblatex based
> PDFs! It builds fine on
On 2009-02-13 19:28, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Zitat von "Jens Seidel" :
>> Current dblatex solution is not so ugly ...
>
> Good!
Hey, it looks excellent, nearly like the other dblatex based
PDFs! It builds fine on etch, I just tested in a chroot. Many
thanks, Jens!
We have to make sure, that so
On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote:
> I found a funny footnote in the German file
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/alpha/release-notes.de.pdf
> in section 4.5.8 (page 24): There is a large TeX code embedded:
Seems to be complicated. If I don't use the hyphenation hack, it
disappears. A
No software to buy, download and install, no time wasted.
Just send your word, excel, powerpoint file as an attachment and you'll get your PDF by return mail.
Check it out here www.koolwire.com
The KoolWIRE Team
ation available. One thing that I'm pleased to
> > see is that much of it's documentation appears to be available in PDF
> > format. Even when browsing online I prefer documentation that at least
> > looks like a book. For a few of the PDF documents listed on t
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:06:24PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
>
> Osamu, updating bin/debiandoc2* tools should fix it. I will try it this
> evening.
True but some caution.
The latest source are designed to work with latex-cjk-all instead of
cjk-latex. -s seems not supported in debian machine.
S
uch of it's documentation appears to be available in PDF
> format. Even when browsing online I prefer documentation that at least
> looks like a book. For a few of the PDF documents listed on the Debian
> website I'm getting HTTP 404 errors. They are:
>
> http://www
Debian Webmaster(s),
I'm considering switching to Debian and am trying to browse through the
impressive amount of documentation available. One thing that I'm pleased to
see is that much of it's documentation appears to be available in PDF
format. Even when browsing online I prefe
El Viernes, 17 de Junio de 2005 00:21, Ivannia Calvo escribió:
> Puede alguien decirme cual comando o programa de linux (debian) me
> sirve para pasar un documento PDF a HTML?
(Ivannia's sentence translated to English):
Could anyone tell me which command or linux (debi
Puede alguien decirme cual comando o programa de linux (debian) me
sirve para pasar un documento PDF a HTML?
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:13:55AM +0200, Robert Cheramy wrote:
> quoting the Debian Policy [1]
> The current version of this document is also available from the Debian
> web mirrors at /doc/debian-policy/[2]. Also available from the same
> directory are several other formats: policy.html.tar.gz, p
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
quoting the Debian Policy [1]
The current version of this document is also available from the Debian
web mirrors at /doc/debian-policy/[2]. Also available from the same
directory are several other formats: policy.html.tar.gz, policy.pdf.gz
and policy.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:37:31AM +0200, Vincent Thomasset wrote:
> was there a problem or a 'rewrite' has to be done ?
> Not available for any language.
This is a known problem. The system that builds the reference
guide is missing a package that is required to build it.
--
Matt Kraai
Hello,
was there a problem or a 'rewrite' has to be done ?
Not available for any language.
sorry for my poor english.
Greets,
Vincent Thomasset
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 08:39:25AM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Another thing worth mentioning is that I changed the fonts to 'Palatino' and
> > 'Helvetica' to improve readability of the PDF and PS d
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another thing worth mentioning is that I changed the fonts to 'Palatino' and
> 'Helvetica' to improve readability of the PDF and PS docs.
Are you embedding Palatino? If so, which one? It's not one of the
co
the 'tilde' character (and
for some reason a Spanish doc had problems with the 'circumflex' character so
that is fixed too).
Another thing worth mentioning is that I changed the fonts to 'Palatino' and
'Helvetica' to improve readability of the PDF and PS docs.
As far
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:34:27 -0500
> > If tetex-bin >= 1.0.7+20011202-5.1 then it might help you
> > to add /etc/texmf/texmf.d/90boot (or something appropr
Atsuhito Kohda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:26:47 -0500
>
> > After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appe
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:26:47 -0500
> After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appears that
> we run into the default pool sizes of LaTeX. I'
Hi,
After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appears that
we run into the default pool sizes of LaTeX. I'm not sure where exactly the
boundary lies, but the debian-policy (350K) is definitely too big to be turned
into a PDF document; the PS version can be gene
Attached is patch for english/doc section.
Recently, I have rewrite several "Makefile"s in DDP CVS to produce PDF
which may be most cross platform and easy to print out. (Adding PS is
easy task) This Makefile use recursive call trick to ensure good PDF
file creation.
Also Progeny'
Title: PDF In-The-Box for Delphi
For Delphi Developers who are tired of inefficient PDF
converters: PDF In-The-Box is a VCL component that works like Delphi's TPrinter but writes PDF files. Costs
US$95 only! And no run-time licence!
No printer driver to install, no intermediary fi
93 matches
Mail list logo
