Re: md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-25 Thread Martin Schulze
peter karlsson wrote: > Martin Schulze: > > > Please add ``MD5 checksum:'' in front of them. > > ...as a tag, so that it can be translated. Surely. Regards, Joey -- We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds. - Linus Torvalds Please always Cc to me whe

Re: md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-25 Thread peter karlsson
Martin Schulze: > Please add ``MD5 checksum:'' in front of them. ...as a tag, so that it can be translated. -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html

Re: md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Joey requested that MD5 checksums are put in security advisories on the web > > pages, so I've added them, in a kludgey kinda way. Should we add a > > nonononono! We *already* have the md5's available in a web-

Re: md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi, > > Joey requested that MD5 checksums are put in security advisories on the web > pages, so I've added them, in a kludgey kinda way. Should we add a > description before them, and thus a new tag? peterk? Please add ``MD5 checksum:'' in front of them. Regards, Jo

Re: md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-24 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:23:16PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > At a minimum, there should be a link to the appropriate page in the > list archives. now that's a useful plan. what about a link to the pgp-signed advisory with a note that md5's are available there rather than actually putting the

Re: md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-24 Thread James A. Treacy
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:12:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > nonononono! We *already* have the md5's available in a web-accessible > form in the mailing list archives. Having them on the wml pages is a Bad > Thing. There is no associated signature to validate that the md5's > haven't been ta

Re: md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-24 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Joey requested that MD5 checksums are put in security advisories on the web > pages, so I've added them, in a kludgey kinda way. Should we add a nonononono! We *already* have the md5's available in a web-accessible form in the mailing

Re: md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-24 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:59:37PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > (md5sum: 443f1d654d499f8e62cede1c1b941dd6) > > md5sum could be a tag if it needs to be translated. I think it should. Marcin -- Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~porridge/ GnuPG: 1024D/60F4121

Re: md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-24 Thread James A. Treacy
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi, > > Joey requested that MD5 checksums are put in security advisories on the web > pages, so I've added them, in a kludgey kinda way. Should we add a > description before them, and thus a new tag? peterk? > How about only a slight

md5sums in security advisories

2001-04-24 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, Joey requested that MD5 checksums are put in security advisories on the web pages, so I've added them, in a kludgey kinda way. Should we add a description before them, and thus a new tag? peterk? -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification