Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:20:33 +
with message-id <662ee7d1b2f53_213419960-...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1069884 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #1069884,
regarding Document acronym "ITA" on https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
to b
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@rocketjump.eu
Hi,
it would be nice to document "ITA" on https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ along
with the other acronyms like O/RFA/RFH/ITP/RFP. I'm guessing it means "intent to
adopt"? It's mentioned
Hello pabs,
Am 04.10.20 um 04:13 schrieb Paul Wise:
> wnpp.debian.net is an unofficial service that could go away at any
> moment if the Debian member sponsoring the domain leaves Debian or the
> contributor providing the service decides to shut it down.
yes you are right of course, that's no que
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 9:45 AM Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Having a look at both the resulting listings that we provide in
> www.debian.org/devel/wnpp, and the ones provided in wnpp.debian.net, I
> think maybe we could review our old approach and remove most of the
> listings we we
, but the approach (linking to wnpp.debian.net)
is very different from what we already have in /devel/wnpp section (we
build some lists ourselves with the wnpp.pl script [1], using the data
gathered by the 1ftpfiles script from the cron repo [2].
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml
Hi,
Strictly speaking, it is not a typo. Please see also
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-bugfix
,
"Technically speaking, the following Perl regular expression describes how
bug closing changelogs are identified:
/closes:\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+(?:,\s*(?:bug)?\
Hi www-List,
I think I found a little mistake on the website that -- imho -- should
be corrected.
In the paragraph
"Of course, the easiest way of closing these bugs is to include an entry
in the package changelog saying what you've done and append (closes:
bug#n) to it. This way the bug will
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Simon Kainz wrote:
> i just noticed that https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ seems to be
> last updated at Sat, Dec 20, according to the timestamp in the footer.
Thanks for the notification. It looks like the recent changes to SSL
verification on debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
i just noticed that https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ seems to be
last updated at Sat, Dec 20, according to the timestamp in the footer.
"
Last Modified: Sat, Dec 20 11:36:05 UTC 2014
"
Also, how-can-i-help --old shows more
Your message dated Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:01:14 -0400
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #182659,
regarding www.debian.org: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ needs to say how to
adopt
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:28:01 -0400
with message-id <4db0a161@altern.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#574550: www.debian.org/devel/wnpp: move away from
bts2ldap.debian.net
has caused the Debian Bug report #574550,
regarding www.debian.org/devel/wnpp: move awa
ould be enough.
Cheers
Index: wnpp.pl
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/webwml/webwml/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -r1.44 wnpp.pl
--- wnpp.pl 17 Mar 2010 22:30:49 - 1.44
+++ wnpp.pl 17 Apr 2011 21:08:12 -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 574550 patch confirmed
Bug #574550 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org/devel/wnpp: move away from
bts2ldap.debian.net
Added tag(s) confirmed and patch.
> severity 574550 normal
Bug #574550 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org/devel/wnpp: mov
:32]:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:11:18PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Package: www.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged.en.html at the
> > moment, I read:
> > * libnss-gw-name: nss module that name
Hi Ben,
thanks for bringing this up.
On Thursday 03 July 2008 16:28, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> I see squeak on:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
>
> * squeak -- license issues.
>
> Maybe this should be clarified, now that squeak-vm is in Debian? (There
> are
I see squeak on:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
* squeak -- license issues.
Maybe this should be clarified, now that squeak-vm is in Debian? (There
are still license issues with the squeak images, but the avg. user
might not make the distinction between squeak-vm and squeak
I'd like to propose that the listing of
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned
would include a date, when the package was orphaned.
-MM-DD package: (package info)
Jari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Pretty much all pages under http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp seem to
indicate there are no packages that are orphaned or being adopted; in
particular the following 3 packages find no match:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned
http
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 10:55 -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Hi. Mentioned on that page is "gfax: The GNU HaliFAX Sender", which (I
> presume) should be "gfax: The GNU HylaFAX Sender".
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/gnome/gfax suggests otherwise:
"This is the GNU HaliFAX Sender, a component of GN
Hi. Mentioned on that page is "gfax: The GNU HaliFAX Sender", which (I
presume) should be "gfax: The GNU HylaFAX Sender".
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling
- -
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Your message dated Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:55:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274393: www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage shouldn't
list python-mysqldb
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
hi,
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage lists python-mysqldb,
although i adopted it over a month ago, and closed the relating RFA bug
(255473)
bye
jonas
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 01:47:35AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> I just wanted to check wether one package has been ITP's or not, so I
> entered http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/itp into my browser's URL bar.
> Unfortunately, this didn't work, as the link is called 'b
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I just wanted to check wether one package has been ITP's or not, so I
entered http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/itp into my browser's URL bar.
Unfortunately, this didn't work, as the link is called 'being_packaged'.
I
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:59:29AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 07:29:01PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:39:07PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > I've reworked the generation of the devel/w
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 07:29:01PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:39:07PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I've reworked the generation of the devel/wnpp pages. My first intention
> > was to remove the need to access the bts2ldap gatew
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:39:07PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I've reworked the generation of the devel/wnpp pages. My first intention
> was to remove the need to access the bts2ldap gateway for each language.
> My version generates one wnpp.data file which is then i
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:13:00PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-15 22:39]:
> > Attached you find a patch against wnpp.pl and the Makefile, the wnpp.wml
> > file that now resides in english/templates/debian and the splitted
> > output files. (not
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-15 22:39]:
> Attached you find a patch against wnpp.pl and the Makefile, the wnpp.wml
> file that now resides in english/templates/debian and the splitted
> output files. (not included are the patches from po/)
I don't think anyone maintains this wn
Hi.
I've reworked the generation of the devel/wnpp pages. My first intention
was to remove the need to access the bts2ldap gateway for each language.
My version generates one wnpp.data file which is then included by the
individual pages. You can also translate all strings in the page (the
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-06 14:45]:
> > I'd like to get /devel/wnpp current again. What's the recommended way
> > to do this? I'm quite willing to write the needed code, set up cron
> > jobs etc, but how to put the result on the we
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-06 14:33]:
> I'd like to get /devel/wnpp current again. What's the recommended way
> to do this? I'm quite willing to write the needed code, set up cron
> jobs etc, but how to put the result on the web site?
Basically, yo
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:33:27PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to get /devel/wnpp current again. What's the recommended way
> to do this? I'm quite willing to write the needed code, set up cron
> jobs etc, but how to put the result on the web sit
Hi,
I'd like to get /devel/wnpp current again. What's the recommended way
to do this? I'm quite willing to write the needed code, set up cron
jobs etc, but how to put the result on the web site?
Cheers,
Andi
PS: Please Cc me or debian-qa (or both) on answers.
--
http:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:31:22AM -0700, doug jensen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:58:01AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> > [1] It was meant to request for Co-Maintainers, but RFC is not appropriate,
> > IMHO. RFH might be misleading too (the help tag on BTS). Perheps RFU
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:58:01AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> [1] It was meant to request for Co-Maintainers, but RFC is not appropriate,
> IMHO. RFH might be misleading too (the help tag on BTS). Perheps RFU
> (Uploaders) can be used, but I'm not sure.
Maybe, RFM - Request For
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:29:22PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> >From a technical point of view I can add as many new tags as you want.
> But there at least two other criteria:
> - It must be documented. Patches welcome
> - Someone must make the decision which tags to accept. I can only
> pr
[CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED] for comment]
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:58:01AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:58:11PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > The script is webwml/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl from the webwml CVS.
> >
>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:58:11PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> The script is webwml/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl from the webwml CVS.
>
> > Can those be easily extended to include a Request For Sponsor report?
>
> Yes, should be no problem. All they do is parsing the
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:22:07PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> What scripts create the WNPP reports, such as being_packaged and so forth?
The script is webwml/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl from the webwml CVS.
> Can those be easily extended to include a Request For Sponsor report?
Yes,
What scripts create the WNPP reports, such as being_packaged and so forth?
Can those be easily extended to include a Request For Sponsor report?
- Matt
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 03:49:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:40:58PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I just read devel/wnpp/index and found it somewhat confusing.
> > I prepared a patch that adds a toc and makes some layout
> > changes
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:40:58PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I just read devel/wnpp/index and found it somewhat confusing.
> I prepared a patch that adds a toc and makes some layout
> changes.
>
> Objections? (Yeah, I know this looks lika a pain for translators but I
>
Hi.
I just read devel/wnpp/index and found it somewhat confusing.
I prepared a patch that adds a toc and makes some layout
changes.
Objections? (Yeah, I know this looks lika a pain for translators but I
can commit as much as possible for each translation so they
have only to add the toc part
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 12:02:09PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-24 21:50]:
> > Modified files:
> > german/devel/wnpp: index.wml
> >
> > Log message:
> > s/voraussichtlich/zuk?nftig/
>
> I
* Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-24 21:50]:
> Modified files:
> german/devel/wnpp: index.wml
>
> Log message:
> s/voraussichtlich/zukünftig/
I'm not sure if this change is correct. According to my dictionary
prospective means &
>>>>> "J" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
J> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:02:07AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> Package: www.debian.org
>> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-27
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> http://www
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:02:07AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-27
> Severity: wishlist
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ should have a link
>
>Ok, I want to adopt a package. How do I become a
>
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-27
Severity: wishlist
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ should have a link
Ok, I want to adopt a package. How do I become a
developer?
etc. near the top.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:40:49PM +0200, Niklas Vainio wrote:
> I think the lists in the page should link both to the description of the
> package and to the ITO.
Good idea, I've committed a change. Thanks.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Hello,
I have a suggestion for the page mentioned in subject.
I think the lists in the page should link both to the description of the
package and to the ITO. Using the package auto-pgp as an example, this
is what I suggest:
http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/auto-pgp.html";>
auto-pgp:
* Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-02 14:25]:
> Alright, but I am not really sure if this part of your commit was
> correct:
>
> -
> -:]
>
> The last line was the slice close from the [WORK: slice started some
> lines before. I think it should stay. For consistence, although it
Ye
* Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-31 05:12]:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml
> Module name: webwml
> Changes by: tbm 02/12/31 05:12:20
>
> Modified files:
> english/devel/wnpp: Makefile index.wml wnpp.pl wnpp.wml
>
> Log message:
>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:19:28AM -0600, Debian WWW CVS wrote:
> CVSROOT: /org/cvs.debian.org/cvs/webwml
> Module name: webwml
> Changes by: weasel 02/08/26 00:19:28
>
> Modified files:
> english/devel/wnpp: wnpp.pl
>
> Log message:
> It seems th
Hi!
I took a look at that file because I was wondering about that reportbug
stuff peterk and noel where talking about.
And I found something quite strange: With the addition of the
reportbug wnpp guide the hint for X-Debbugs-Cc: seems quite out of place
here. It doesn't seperate clear
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, peter karlsson wrote:
Hello Peter,
> > Its a step-by-step guide to use "reportbug wnpp".
> > What do mean by "proper guide"? Isn't this a proper guide?
>
> It looks like just a couple of screendumps from reportbug with some
> sprinkled comments, not a guide. Anyway, shouldn'
Noel Koethe:
> Its a step-by-step guide to use "reportbug wnpp".
> What do mean by "proper guide"? Isn't this a proper guide?
It looks like just a couple of screendumps from reportbug with some
sprinkled comments, not a guide. Anyway, shouldn't it be on a separate page
(the wnpp page is long enou
On Sam, 09 Feb 2002, peter karlsson wrote:
> > added way to use reportbug for wnpp; my permission:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2002/debian-www-200201/msg00137.html
> > ;)
>
> Hmm, I was looking into translating that but noticed it looks mostly
> like you've just done some screendump
Debian WWW CVS:
> Modified files:
> english/devel/wnpp: index.wml
>
> Log message:
> added way to use reportbug for wnpp; my permission:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2002/debian-www-200201/msg00137.html
> ;)
Hmm, I was looking into translating that but noticed
n 2002 14:35:53 +1100
From: Matt Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: /devel/wnpp/ appears to be empty.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposi
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 02:35:53PM +1100, Matt Hope wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: serious
>
> the /devel/wnpp/ pages appear to be broken, all categories read
> "no packages" or similar.
>
Fixed. Thanks for reporting this.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: serious
the /devel/wnpp/ pages appear to be broken, all categories read
"no packages" or similar.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:04:50PM +0100, Noel Koethe wrote:
> it is possible to use "reportbug wnpp" to submit bugs
> against the wnpp.
> Maybe this should be added to the webside because its
> much easier than mailing in the requested format because
> it offers a form to file out.
Feel free :)
Hello,
it is possible to use "reportbug wnpp" to submit bugs
against the wnpp.
Maybe this should be added to the webside because its
much easier than mailing in the requested format because
it offers a form to file out.
--
Noèl Köthe
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 05:43:58PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:53:59PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > It does not appear that english/devel/wnpp.wml is building.
> > If this is not correct, could someone look into it?
>
> Looks good to me.
>
>From english/devel/Makef
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:53:59PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> It does not appear that english/devel/wnpp.wml is building.
> If this is not correct, could someone look into it?
The log says:
make[3]: Entering directory `/org/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/wnpp&#x
It does not appear that english/devel/wnpp.wml is building.
If this is not correct, could someone look into it?
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
67 matches
Mail list logo
