Hi,
Am 12.11.19 um 17:59 schrieb Laura Arjona Reina:
[snip]
> Great, thanks!
thanks all for agreeing!
I've switched the merge method.
--
Regards
Carsten Schoenert
Hi Carsten
El 12 de noviembre de 2019 7:49:26 CET, Carsten Schoenert
escribió:
>Hi,
>
>I'd like to ask if any body has objections if we'd change the current
>behavior for the merge method?
>
>The current setting is to do "Merge commits".
>I'd like to change this to "Fast-forward merge".
>
>Secti
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 07:49:26 +0100,
Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'd like to ask if any body has objections if we'd change the current
>behavior for the merge method?
>
>The current setting is to do "Merge commits".
>I'd like to change this to "Fast-forward merge".
>
>Section Merge-Requests
>h
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:35:07PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
>+1 for Fast-forward
+2
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Managing a volunteer open source project is a lot like herding
kittens, except the kittens randomly appear and disappear becau
+1 for Fast-forward
--
regards Thomas
Hi all,
On 12.11.19 07:49, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to ask if any body has objections if we'd change the current
> behavior for the merge method?
>
> The current setting is to do "Merge commits".
> I'd like to change this to "Fast-forward merge".
+1
Merges make sense if you
Hi,
I'd like to ask if any body has objections if we'd change the current
behavior for the merge method?
The current setting is to do "Merge commits".
I'd like to change this to "Fast-forward merge".
Section Merge-Requests
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/edit
In the end the commi
7 matches
Mail list logo