On Saturday 22 October 2005 16:48, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> That aside, I don't care if we call it obsolete or not, but I think
> it's really important to point out that sarge exists in the woody
> release information. So maybe something like this is better?
Yes, that looks great as long as Wood
Sorry for the messed-up references header. Please cc: me - I don't follow
-www
Frans Pop:
> On Thursday 20 October 2005 21.32, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
[woody release notes don't point to sarge]
>> /me points to <http://bugs.debian.org/323770> which even includes a
On Thursday 20 October 2005 21:32, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > > http://www.us.debian.org/releases/potato/ the following :
> > > "Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has been obsoleted by Debian GNU/Linux 3.0
> > > ("woody"). Security updates are discontinued as of June 30th,
> > > 2003."
> > >
> > > The same is
On Thursday 20 October 2005 04.36, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > For the 2.2 is written here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/potato/
> > the following :
> > "Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has been obsoleted by Debian GNU/Linux 3.0
> > ("woody"). Sec
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:20:56AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FYI: In the Debian PowerPC section, the woody release notes always gives a
> file
> not found error.
>
> Paul C,
That link is not valid because the notes are no
FYI: In the Debian PowerPC section, the woody release notes always gives a file
not found error.
Paul C,
6 matches
Mail list logo