Hi everybody
El 18/09/14 a las #4, Don Armstrong escribió:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Paul Wise wrote:
>> The other main issue is people wanting partial checkouts.
>>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/WebsiteVCSEvaluation
> [...]
> Can anyone who currently uses partial checkouts comment whether a 500M
> one
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Sounds useful but... The problem is that not every package will have a
> wiki page and so we need some mechanism to figure out which ones do.
> Should be easy enough to add a page list export to wiki.debian.org if
> you would like to start this p
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> Here's a mockup image about the placement:
> https://i.imgur.com/Yl7YZMa.png
The wiki is documentation rather than support, so I put it in the other column.
> I also find having both "Mailing lists" and "Mailing lists archives" on the
>
Hi,
On 11-09-2014 09:16, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
just a couple of ideas about the wiki:
* visibility on front page of www.debian.org.
Currently dozens of links on fron tpage, but the wiki is not visible.
Good point, I've added a link to i
On Mi, 17 sep 14, 22:41:38, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> Can anyone who currently uses partial checkouts comment whether a 500M
> one time checkout would be a burden? [Is this just a matter of better
> tools for people doing translations?]
Most probably, and I'm guessing moving to po4a would solve mo
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Paul Wise wrote:
> The other main issue is people wanting partial checkouts.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/WebsiteVCSEvaluation
Partial checkouts aren't really workable with git, unfortunately. [1]
From experience, though, we're only talking on the order of 500M or so
for a com
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I don't even know how we'd go about making this decision.
I think the biggest issue is the translation headers, which rely on
CVS revision numbers. We could replace them with git commit ids and or
switch to Locale::Po4a::Wml.
The other main
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> Am 17.09.2014 00:16, schrieb Don Armstrong:
> > On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> >> I'm interested to migrate from CVS to whatever DVCS. Git is the most
> >> used today so it's probably the best choice: - more help for beginner
> >> - advan
Le Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek a écrit :
>
> Is your preliminary work available somewhere or isn't is any value yet
> for other contributors?
Hi Thomas,
this does not answer directly to your question, but you may find the following
link useful.
https://wiki.debian.
Am 17.09.2014 00:16, schrieb Don Armstrong:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
>> I'm interested to migrate from CVS to whatever DVCS. Git is the most
>> used today so it's probably the best choice: - more help for beginner
>> - advanced user has used/uses/will use Git at some point
>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 03:16:57PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
>> I'm interested to migrate from CVS to whatever DVCS. Git is the most
>> used today so it's probably the best choice: - more help for beginner
>> - advanced user has used/uses/will use Git
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> I'm interested to migrate from CVS to whatever DVCS. Git is the most
> used today so it's probably the best choice: - more help for beginner
> - advanced user has used/uses/will use Git at some point
I'm also interested in seeing -ww move away from CV
2014-09-10 19:25 GMT+02:00 Steve McIntyre :
> debian-www
> ==
>
> * We're still using CVS for the website, which is a PITA. Git might
> work, but for a few (potential?) problems:
>
> + New way of working for our contributors, including translators who
> may not cope with learning a
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:05:04PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:40 AM, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
>> - For every new wiki account, mail a copy of the very first page edit (diff)
>> to a small number of people. Should be very easy to spot spam, and only then
>> some action needs to
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:05:33PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Fabien Givors (Debian) wrote:
>
>> Since the question of authentication is on the table (and sorry if it
>> has already been asked, I didn't find any thread related to that on
>> d-www), I was wondering why
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> just a couple of ideas about the wiki:
>
> * visibility on front page of www.debian.org.
> Currently dozens of links on fron tpage, but the wiki is not visible.
Good point, I've added a link to it under the documentation section in
the
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:40 AM, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> - For every new wiki account, mail a copy of the very first page edit (diff)
> to a small number of people. Should be very easy to spot spam, and only then
> some action needs to be taken.
We already have some people following RecentChanges a
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Could we use po4a / gettext for www.d.o translation?
>
>
> Maybe - we need people to work on this to see if we can make it work.
The discussion on IRC seems to indicate yes, using Locale::Po4
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Fabien Givors (Debian) wrote:
> Since the question of authentication is on the table (and sorry if it
> has already been asked, I didn't find any thread related to that on
> d-www), I was wondering why the different wikis (wiki, debconf, maybe
> others) each have t
Hi,
just a couple of ideas about the wiki:
* visibility on front page of www.debian.org.
Currently dozens of links on fron tpage, but the wiki is not visible.
There is "ports/architecture" link on front page bellow "Support"
links. I would not be shocked if this was moved to "Developers" are
Hi,
Many thanks to Steve and the www/wiki/video teams for the BoF and this
summary.
On 10/09/2014 19:25, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> debian-wiki
> ===
> [snip]
> Questions about account setup, clarified that account holders in the
> wiki don't need to be DDs. Sign-ups are free for anyone who
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
Wiki anti-spam discussion
=
[..]
There's no perfect solution here - we're having to work out spam/ham
on a small amount of information, and we can never be *100%* sure.
Just another 2 cents (maybe already implemented?)
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ]
Hi folks,
As promised, here's a quick summary of what was discussed at the BoF
session in Portland. Apologies for the delay - it takes a while to
write these up... :-/
Thanks to the awesome efforts of our video team, the session is
already online [1].
23 matches
Mail list logo
