> With out any individual event summary.
No, I thought that one should make it as it is now, but also making the
"1999 Events" and so links to their pages. Might not be really necessary
since, as was pointed out, the 2000 page doesn't contain anything that isn't
on the main page. I just thought th
On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 05:48:46AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, peter karlsson wrote:
> > On the event pages, it would be a good idea if the main "Events in "
> > would be links to the year indices. As of now, the index for 2000 is not
> > linked at all, since there are no
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, peter karlsson wrote:
> On the event pages, it would be a good idea if the main "Events in "
> would be links to the year indices. As of now, the index for 2000 is not
> linked at all, since there are no past events for 2000 (obviously).
I'm not exactly sure I understand wh
On the event pages, it would be a good idea if the main "Events in "
would be links to the year indices. As of now, the index for 2000 is not
linked at all, since there are no past events for 2000 (obviously).
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Bored of spam? Try Fidonet. http://www.f
4 matches
Mail list logo
