On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 09:28:35PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> What's the status on browser support for PNG, anyway?
>
> BTW nobody has yet complained about the `corner' images in the navbar, and
> those are PNGs... which doesn't really mean anything since those images are
> rather small, maybe no
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 07:32:07AM -0800, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > > 1) Why are most Pics in the pages gif's? This is probably been
> > >discussed before, but it must have been before I joined the
> > >list. In general I stay away from gif's, and I even had to install
> > >the gimp-no
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:34:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:55:34PM +0100, Ignasi Palou-Rivera wrote:
> > 1) Why are most Pics in the pages gif's? This is probably been
> >discussed before, but it must have been before I joined the
> >list. In general I stay aw
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:55:34PM +0100, Ignasi Palou-Rivera wrote:
> 1) Why are most Pics in the pages gif's? This is probably been
>discussed before, but it must have been before I joined the
>list. In general I stay away from gif's, and I even had to install
>the gimp-nonfree packag
I have just started to work on the translation of the Debian WWW pages
to Catalan. I have two quite separate and very different questions:
1) Why are most Pics in the pages gif's? This is probably been
discussed before, but it must have been before I joined the
list. In general I stay away f
5 matches
Mail list logo
