Bug#631913: marked as done (www.debian.org/banners: outdated sarge banners under "current banners")

Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:28:54 +0200 with message-id <20110628102854.ga10...@zouish.org> and subject line Re: Bug#631913: www.debian.org/banners: outdated sarge banners under "current banners" has caused the Debian Bug report #631913, regarding www.debian.org/banners

Bug#631913: www.debian.org/banners: outdated sarge banners under "current banners"

Package: www.debian.org Tags: patch Under www.debian.org/banners there are banners from Debian Sarge in the section "Current banners", while there is a separate section "Old banner ads" at the bottom at the page for such outdated banners. And these Sarge banners are already

Bug#580742: Sarge incorrectly listed as latest PowerPC release on www.debian.org/ports/powerpc

Package: www.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Severity: normal Currently Lenny and Squeeze still have PowerPC support. Webpage should be updated. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core

Bug#580741: Sarge incorrectly listed as latest PowerPC release on www.debian.org/ports/powerpc

Package: www.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Severity: normal Currently Lenny and Squeeze still have PowerPC support. Webpage should be updated. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-21-ge

Re: Debian 3.1 (sarge)

(Reply-to set to d-u-polish) mateuszeska...@vp.pl wrote: > Witam czy jest dostepna wersja Debian 3.1 (sarge) i ile by kosztowała > bardzo potrzebna. I don't read Polish, but I suspect you're looking for this: http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/ Cheers, FJP -

Re: Debian 3.1 (sarge)

Hi, On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:22:31PM +0100, mateuszeska...@vp.pl wrote: > Witam czy jest dostepna wersja Debian 3.1 (sarge) i ile by kosztowała bardzo > potrzebna. debian-www is an *english* speaking mailing list *about the website*. For technical information in your native languag

Debian 3.1 (sarge)

Witam czy jest dostepna wersja Debian 3.1 (sarge) i ile by kosztowała bardzo potrzebna.

Bug#521759: marked as done (www.debian.org: sarge installer links broken)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:13:02 -0700 with message-id <20090329231302.gb18...@ftbfs.org> and subject line Re: Bug#521759: www.debian.org: sarge installer links broken has caused the Debian Bug report #521759, regarding www.debian.org: sarge installer links broken to be marked a

Bug#521759: www.debian.org: sarge installer links broken

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The links to "other images" on this page: http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/ are broken. Maybe they should be updated to point to archive.debian.org? -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unst

Re: Fw: Debian - Sarge

since you keep sending messages on the list while we already answered you. > --- On Thu, 4/12/08, Jamie Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Jamie Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Fw: Debian - Sarge > > To: debian-www@lists.debian.org > &g

Fw: Debian - Sarge

l it even be before someone acknowledges this? --- On Thu, 4/12/08, Jamie Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Jamie Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Fw: Debian - Sarge > To: debian-www@lists.debian.org > Date: Thursday, 4 December, 2008, 8:13 PM > PLEASE HELP >

Re: Debian - Sarge

ire anything while being aggressive.. > I've this evening downloaded Sarge from the debian website. I > downloaded the network install which is what I need following an > online guide to creating a DNS server. > > I've run it and got to the packages screen. It tries to updat

Fw: Debian - Sarge

PLEASE HELP I need these packages. --- On Thu, 4/12/08, Jamie Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Jamie Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Debian - Sarge > To: debian-www@lists.debian.org > Date: Thursday, 4 December, 2008, 8:01 PM > I've this evening

Debian - Sarge

I've this evening downloaded Sarge from the debian website. I downloaded the network install which is what I need following an online guide to creating a DNS server. I've run it and got to the packages screen. It tries to update by both http and ftp and none of the mirrors seem t

Bug#475043: marked as done (www.debian.org: ports/arm/index believes Sarge is stable)

Your message dated Thu, 4 Dec 2008 19:51:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#475043: http://debian.org/ports/arm/index believes Sarge is stable has caused the Debian Bug report #475043, regarding www.debian.org: ports/arm/index believes Sarge is stable

Bug#475043: http://debian.org/ports/arm/index believes Sarge is stable

/arm/ claims: > stable (sarge), testing (etch) and unstable (sid). > > Please change it either to > oldstable (sarge), stable (etch) and unstable (sid). > > or, better, check the chroots and update this section. Could you please tell us what is the current state of available chroo

Re: www: link to sarge info dead

Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 23:21 +0200 schrieb Simon Paillard: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:42:09PM +0200, Michael Taeschner wrote: > > Link http://www.debian.org/releases/oldstable/ is ded (error 404) on page > > We may easily add a oldstable link to sarge as there is already

Re: www: link to sarge info dead

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:42:09PM +0200, Michael Taeschner wrote: > Link http://www.debian.org/releases/oldstable/ is ded (error 404) on page We may easily add a oldstable link to sarge as there is already some for etch, lenny and sid. Who is against ? :) > http://www.debian.org/New

www: link to sarge info dead

Link http://www.debian.org/releases/oldstable/ is ded (error 404) on page http://www.debian.org/News/2008/20080413 (german translation) should probably read: http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/ English original is OK. Reagards, Michael -- GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen

Bug#475043: www.debian.org: ports/arm/index believes Sarge is stable

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The page claims: stable (sarge), testing (etch) and unstable (sid). Please change it either to oldstable (sarge), stable (etch) and unstable (sid). or, better, check the chroots and update this section. -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann

Please add CVE 2007-5940 to Sarge and Etch non-vulns pages

Hi WWW folks, please add CVE 2007-5940 (The feynmf drawing package suffers from a symbolic link vulnerability) to the Sarge and Etch non-vulnerabilities pages. (Package was not present in Sarge, and I applied a fix to it prior to the version in Etch.) Cf. http://lwn.net/Alerts/259543/ Thanks

Re: description are confusing on sarge update site

Hi! * Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070618 15:29]: > > i had trouble to find out to get the right packages for sarge. Today I > > found your site ???Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 updated??? and an explanation > please be more specific, which page? > http://www.debian.org/relea

Re: description are confusing on sarge update site

Hi, On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:16:55PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i had trouble to find out to get the right packages for sarge. Today I > found your site “Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 updated” and an explanation please be more specific, which page? http://www.debian.org/releases/

description are confusing on sarge update site

Hello, i had trouble to find out to get the right packages for sarge. Today I found your site “Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 updated” and an explanation about to update sources.list for apt.get. I am confused that you point at the oldstable branch but in the example down side you talk about “http

Re: [PATCH] sarge -> etch in releases/etch/releasenotes.wml

On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 06:05:04PM +0900, Kobayashi Noritada wrote: > Here attached a patch for including releases/etch/release.data, not > releases/sarge/release.data, in releases/etch/releasenotes.wml. Could > you please apply this? Thanks, done. This was not the only error in Rele

[PATCH] sarge -> etch in releases/etch/releasenotes.wml

Hi, Here attached a patch for including releases/etch/release.data, not releases/sarge/release.data, in releases/etch/releasenotes.wml. Could you please apply this? Thanks, -nori Index: english/releases/etch/releasenotes.wml

Re: References to Sarge instead of testing probably outdated on devel/buildd/setting-up

t; Since the page was written by Javier in 2004 I assume we have to change > Sarge ==> Etch. Can someone confirm this? Yes, it has to be updated. > There are probably many other pages affected as well. I don't think there is any other buildd-related page referencing woody. Regards

References to Sarge instead of testing probably outdated on devel/buildd/setting-up

Hi, I noticed that http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/setting-up has many fixed references to Debian distribution code names where variables or one of stable, testing and unstable should be used. Since the page was written by Javier in 2004 I assume we have to change Sarge ==> Etch. Can some

Bug#363493: marked as done (many links to source packages in sarge updates (3.1r1, r2, r3) broken)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:50:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line release update announces: links fixed in order to point to source packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#363493: www.debian.org: many links to source packages in sarge updates (3.1r1, r2) broken

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:26:17AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal > > For example in http://www.us.debian.org/News/2006/20060419, there is a > link to http://packages.debian.org/xine-lib, which is broken since there > is no xine-lib binary package. It l

Processed: retitle 363493 to many links to source packages in sarge updates (3.1r1, r2, r3) broken

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 363493 many links to source packages in sarge updates (3.1r1, r2, r3) > broken Bug#363493: www.debian.org: many links to source packages in sarge updates (3.1r1, r2) broken Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping proces

New book in french: Debian Sarge GNU/Linux

Hello, I would like to submit a new book about Debian in french : Book title Debian GNU/Linux version 3.1 (Sarge) - System administration (Debian GNU/Linux version 3.1 (Sarge) - Administration du système) Author Yann Le Thieis, Nicolas Pons Language(s) the book is written

Bug#323770: marked as done (woody obsoleted by sarge release)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:58:18 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323770: woody obsoleted by sarge release has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Re: http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/errata.html

t easy. > I'm guessing this is about english/releases/sarge/errata.wml. Yes... this one. :) > To apply the patch to all translations, use the smart_change.pl script in > the webwml root directory. > Something like: > smart_change.pl -s "s/apt get/aptitude/"

Re: http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/errata.html

. There are several files named errata.wml... I'm guessing this is about english/releases/sarge/errata.wml. To apply the patch to all translations, use the smart_change.pl script in the webwml root directory. Something like: smart_change.pl -s "s/apt get/aptitude/" english/relea

Re: http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/errata.html

get and the debian documentation should be > consistently. > > Regards, > Erik > > [1] > http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.html#s-upgradingpackages If it is ok to others, I can apply the attached patch. But I will need some help to do a

http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/errata.html

After that, run apt-get update followed by apt-get upgrade. I think aptitude should be mentioned instead of apt-get, since it is the recommended tool [1] over apt-get and the debian documentation should be consistently. Regards, Erik [1] http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/i386/release

Re: Wrong links to Sarge r2

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:16:55PM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il giorno mer, 26/04/2006 alle 17.32 +0200, Norbert Dadacz ha scritto: > > http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/ > > > > The links to the Sarge version are wrong! Now you get r1 instead of &g

Re: Wrong links to Sarge r2

Il giorno mer, 26/04/2006 alle 17.32 +0200, Norbert Dadacz ha scritto: > http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/ > > The links to the Sarge version are wrong! Now you get r1 instead of > r2. :( In what language is the web page displayed? Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBS

Wrong links to Sarge r2

http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/debian-installer/ The links to the Sarge version are wrong! Now you get r1 instead of r2. :( Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#363493: www.debian.org: many links to source packages in sarge updates (3.1r1, r2) broken

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal For example in http://www.us.debian.org/News/2006/20060419, there is a link to http://packages.debian.org/xine-lib, which is broken since there is no xine-lib binary package. It looks like adding stable/sources/ to the correction and dsa tags in webwml/engl

Re: draft of announcement for sarge r2

Hi, On Friday, 14 Apr 2006, you wrote: > * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060414 17:14]: > > * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060412 11:07]: > > > as we're now directly moving towards sarge r2, we drafted an > > > announcement. Please see the attac

Re: Update woody/sarge info in debian-jr webpages

On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 17:09 -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > While reviewing a translation for a Debian Jr. [1]page, > I fount out that there are some information about Woody/Sarge > that is not up-to-date. :) > > [1]http://www.debian.org/devel/debia

Re: 14 CD's Sarge: CD #1 Hangs

[This question is really more on topic for debian-user@lists.debian.org, not -www; forwarding there with appropriate M-F-T; please address further replies to -user.] On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, craig wrote: > This system is a EPIA-M Mini-ITX with a EPIA-M series motherboard > with a ID C5C VIA C3 Ezra pr

14 CD's Sarge: CD #1 Hangs

Sir: I purchased the full Sarge CD set for the x86, which I received in the mail. I wish to install this on a system which is currently running Fedora Core 4 This system is a EPIA-M Mini-ITX with a EPIA-M series motherboard with a ID C5C VIA C3 Ezra processor. 900 MHz; -march=i586; m3dnow

user debian sarge 3.1

We use Debian Sarge 3.1 for my institution.. I make Web server, database server, FTP server, firewall dial in server, etc.. My Institution location on Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia Engineering Faculty Diponegoro University. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Update woody/sarge info in debian-jr webpages

Gabriel Puliatti escribió: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 05:09:17PM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: Hi, While reviewing a translation for a Debian Jr. [1]page, I fount out that there are some information about Woody/Sarge that is not up-to-date. :) Yeah, I think

Re: Update woody/sarge info in debian-jr webpages

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 05:09:17PM -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > Hi, > > While reviewing a translation for a Debian Jr. [1]page, > I fount out that there are some information about Woody/Sarge > that is not up-to-date. :) Yeah, I think Ben wants to cha

Update woody/sarge info in debian-jr webpages

Hi, While reviewing a translation for a Debian Jr. [1]page, I fount out that there are some information about Woody/Sarge that is not up-to-date. :) [1]http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-jr/index.html I hope that the patch attached help to solve the problem. :o

link sarge 3.1

Salve, credo che i link alle imagini dvd dell'ultima sarge(http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd/)non siano puntati giusti(danno file di dimensioni 300M). buona giornata! micelan

sarge cd 1

Witam   Czy obraz sarge iso cd 1 jest poprawny gdyz podczas instalacji dostaje komunikat w czasie instalowania podstawowego systemu   could not find debs: libsigc++-1.2-5c102   i niestety na tym etapie konczy sie moja instalacja.     Pozdrawiam Slawo

Re: Woody release notes: is obsoleted by sarge now.

On Saturday 22 October 2005 16:48, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > That aside, I don't care if we call it obsolete or not, but I think > it's really important to point out that sarge exists in the woody > release information. So maybe something like this is better? Yes, that loo

Re: Woody release notes: is obsoleted by sarge now.

Sorry for the messed-up references header. Please cc: me - I don't follow -www Frans Pop: > On Thursday 20 October 2005 21.32, Adrian von Bidder wrote: [woody release notes don't point to sarge] >> /me points to <http://bugs.debian.org/323770> which even includes a

Re: Woody release notes: is obsoleted by sarge now.

r. Woody has not yet been obsoleted as it is still in the main archives and there is still Security support for it. Potato _was_ obsoleted because both of these were missing long before Sarge was released. So it might be good to mention that a newer release is available and that use of Sarge ins

Woody release notes: is obsoleted by sarge now.

On Thursday 20 October 2005 04.36, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:34:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > For the 2.2 is written here http://www.us.debian.org/releases/potato/ > > the following : > > "Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 has been obsoleted by Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 > > ("woody"). Sec

Bug#323770: woody obsoleted by sarge release

diff -u -r1.25 index.wml --- index.wml 18 Sep 2003 16:04:23 - 1.25 +++ index.wml 18 Aug 2005 09:37:56 - @@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ our press release and the Release Notes. +Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (woody) has been obsoleted by the release +of http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/sarge/";&g

Re: sarge netinst cd not bootable in ia64

ebian.org/cdimage/unofficial/sarge-amd64/ The paths after that are the same as paths for other images. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: sarge netinst cd not bootable in ia64

[s/debian=www/debian-www/ in CC] On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:10:25AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Someone wrote: > >Maybe it would help if http://cdimage.debian.org/ would actualy > >contain links to the amd64 images. People probably search and search > >and the only thing they see that even partly ma

Bug#316668: ftp-master.debian.org still says Sarge is testing

reassign 316668 ftp.debian.org thanks On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:20:57AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > On http://ftp-master.debian.org under the "Testing" heading, the page > > says "Sarge is testing". Now that Sarge is released, shouldn't this be > >

Processed: Re: Bug#316668: ftp-master.debian.org still says Sarge is testing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 316668 ftp.debian.org Bug#316668: ftp-master.debian.org still says Sarge is testing Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `ftp.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#316668: ftp-master.debian.org still says Sarge is testing

> On http://ftp-master.debian.org under the "Testing" heading, the page > says "Sarge is testing". Now that Sarge is released, shouldn't this be > updated to say "Etch is testing"? ftp-master.debian.org is not www.debian.org - Should this bu

Bug#316668: ftp-master.debian.org still says Sarge is testing

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal On http://ftp-master.debian.org under the "Testing" heading, the page says "Sarge is testing". Now that Sarge is released, shouldn't this be updated to say "Etch is testing"? -- Matthew Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: Sarge DVD ISO

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:28:50PM +0200, Hansgeorg Schwibbe wrote: > >>the Sarge ISO images on >>http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd/ are just 373 >>MB and 127 MB,

Re: Sarge DVD ISO

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:28:50PM +0200, Hansgeorg Schwibbe wrote: > the Sarge ISO images on > http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd/ are just 373 > MB and 127 MB, and the MD5 sums of the images do not match too. I see 4,4GB and 4,1GB there. rega

Sarge DVD ISO

Hello, the Sarge ISO images on http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd/ are just 373 MB and 127 MB, and the MD5 sums of the images do not match too. Best regards, Hansgeorg Schwibbe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: Problem Debian Sarge Download

On Tue Jun 14, 2005 at 15:26:09 +0200, Frank Stimmer wrote: > mir ist aufgefallen, dass der Debian FTP (DVD) leer > ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd/ > > bzw. (CD) unvollständig ist. > ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/ Use http, and you're being redirect

Re: OpenOffice in Debian Sarge

t right, OpenOffice _is_ available in the stable release, as > sarge is stable now and this sentence should be corrected. > I think that will be of interest, if one wants to use Debian on the > desktop. Hi, you're right, I've rewritten that sentence. Thanks for the info!

OpenOffice in Debian Sarge

Hello, there is this sentence on http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian.en.html: "OpenOffice <http://www.openoffice.org/> is also going to be available in the next Debian release." If I got that right, OpenOffice _is_ available in the stable release, as sarge is stable now a

Re: Problem Debian Sarge Download

Hi, this is an English-language mailing list! On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:26:09PM +0200, Frank Stimmer wrote: > mir ist aufgefallen, dass der Debian FTP (DVD) leer > ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd/ [Why is this dir empty?] > bzw. (CD) unvollständig ist. > ftp://ftp.de.debi

Problem Debian Sarge Download

Hallo Debian Team, mir ist aufgefallen, dass der Debian FTP (DVD) leer ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd/ bzw. (CD) unvollständig ist. ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/ Damit sind die Mirrorserver auch nicht auf Stand z.B. ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/de

Re: verbeterd introductiebericht sarge

k > De tekst van het persbericht over de release van sarge vind ik niet bepaald > om over naar huis te schrijven. De zinnen zitten vol stijlfouten en de > indeling van de tekst is onlogisch. > > Ik heb de tekst onder handen genomen en geprobeerd er wat beters van te > maken.

verbeterd introductiebericht sarge

Beste mensen, De tekst van het persbericht over de release van sarge vind ik niet bepaald om over naar huis te schrijven. De zinnen zitten vol stijlfouten en de indeling van de tekst is onlogisch. Ik heb de tekst onder handen genomen en geprobeerd er wat beters van te maken. Kijk er eens naar

Re: Preview: Sarge release announcement

On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:02:31PM +, W. Borgert wrote: > Some more ideas for the announcement (order not relevant): 6. "Release includes ... webmin 1.180" (woody had 0.94, worth to mention as it is our only "admin tool", where others have yast or drake-tools or whatever.) Cheers, Wolfg

Re: Debian sarge 3.1r0 and 3.1r0a

MJ Ray wrote: >Parisot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to know : >> 1 - What are the differences between 3.1r0 and 3.1r0a. > >Updated sources list - please see >http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg3.html > >> 2 - Is it possible to work with a mixing of the two re

Re: Debian sarge 3.1r0 and 3.1r0a

Parisot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to know : > 1 - What are the differences between 3.1r0 and 3.1r0a. Updated sources list - please see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg3.html > 2 - Is it possible to work with a mixing of the two releases : 7 first > CD

Debian sarge 3.1r0 and 3.1r0a

Hello, I'm downloading the 14 CD iso files of Debian Sarge 3.1r0 with jidgo, and of course, it takes a long time... Since yesterday, the names of the iso files have been changed. The new names contain "3.1r0a" and not "3.1r0". I saw that the md5 sum have been change

Re: Link Erratto Cd09.Iso - Sarge

[english follows] Il giorno mar, 07-06-2005 alle 19:09 +0200, alexlovesgod ha scritto: > Salve, volevo comunicarvi un problma del vostro sito: > Nello scaricare la nuova verione di debian, la Sarge, x CD immagini ISO x > i386 il CD numero 9 non ha un link o ha un link errato, vi

Link Erratto Cd09.Iso - Sarge

Salve, volevo comunicarvi un problma del vostro sito: Nello scaricare la nuova verione di debian, la Sarge, x CD immagini ISO x i386 il CD numero 9 non ha un link o ha un link errato, vi prego di sistemarlo. Grazie per la vostra attenzione. Alessandro

Re: Preview: Sarge release announcement

Martin Schulze wrote: > I've written up the release announcement for sarge: > http://people.debian.org/~joey/stuff/debian-announce.txt > > I'd love to coordinate with translators, so we can place the translation > on the website at the same time as the original. If yo

Re: Preview: Sarge release announcement

NOME, Xfce4, and GNUstep desktop environments" (My understanding of the popcon data is, that Xfce4 is more popular than GNUstep.) 2. Mention the superb XML integration! It's much better than it was in woody. (I believe xml-core exists since 2003-04.) 3. Mention the better Java

Re: Preview: Sarge release announcement

isted after Xfce4 in a list of desktop environments. Neither Backbone nor Etoile are ready for this release. I'm glad that someone wants to promote Debian to GNUsteppers, but I think sarge has just frameworks and some apps. Gurkan probably knows more recent detail than me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: Preview: Sarge release announcement

2. Mention the superb XML integration! It's much better than it was in woody. (I believe xml-core exists since 2003-04.) 3. Mention the better Java capabilities of sarge. There was a (draft?) announcement on [EMAIL PROTECTED] some days back. 4. Maybe explain things, not obviou

Preview: Sarge release announcement

Hi, I've written up the release announcement for sarge: http://people.debian.org/~joey/stuff/debian-announce.txt I'd love to coordinate with translators, so we can place the translation on the website at the same time as the original. If you are intersted in this, please get in tou

Sarge errata -> X fails to come up for radeon 9200 SE users.

Hello, On Steve's suggestion, i mail here an errata item for the sarge release, concerning bug#280738. There is a non-fixed bug in sarge's X packages (Bug #280738), which is triggered on dual head radeon 9200 SE and maybe others. The bug is triggered by the card having two pc

Bug#309493: marked as done (Bugs in www.debian.org/releases/sarge)

Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 18:12:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309493: Bugs in www.debian.org/releases/sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#309493: Bugs in www.debian.org/releases/sarge

Package: www.debian.org In the italian version of www.debian.org/releases/sarge the link for the announce of the freezing of sarge points to http://bugs.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg1.html. the link should points to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg1

Re: Bug#307978: Update 'sarge' and 'releases' web pages

* Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-09 19:42] : > On Monday 09 May 2005 02:25, Frédéric Bothamy wrote: > > Thanks, I wonder if there is a way to update translation-check for > > translation files without actually changing the english file (since it > > has already been changed) using smar

Re: Bug#307978: Update 'sarge' and 'releases' web pages

sh/releases/potato/index.wml file? > > > It seems that you changed this file along the sarge/index.wml and the > > > changes include diff conflicts. > > > > > > > Done, sorry for the mess. > > Thanks, I wonder if there is a way to update translation-chec

Re: Bug#307978: Update 'sarge' and 'releases' web pages

On Monday 09 May 2005 02:25, Frédéric Bothamy wrote: > Thanks, I wonder if there is a way to update translation-check for > translation files without actually changing the english file (since it > has already been changed) using smart_change.pl... Hi, sorry, I didn't read your message earlier, so

Re: Bug#307978: Update 'sarge' and 'releases' web pages

* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-08 23:58] : > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:08:30PM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote: > > > > Could you please fix the webwml/english/releases/potato/index.wml file? > > It seems that you changed this file along

Re: Bug#307978: Update 'sarge' and 'releases' web pages

On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:08:30PM +0200, Frédéric Bothamy wrote: > > Could you please fix the webwml/english/releases/potato/index.wml file? > It seems that you changed this file along the sarge/index.wml and the > changes include diff conflicts. > Done, sorry for the mess.

Re: Bug#307978: Update 'sarge' and 'releases' web pages

* Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-07 09:54] : > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: important > > The webpage for Debian Releases (http://www.debian.org/releases) and > the webpage for Debian GNU/Linux codenamed 'Sarge' > (http://www.debian.org/re

Re: Sarge frozen

I've submitted bug #307978: Update 'sarge' and 'release' web pages. Andrew

Bug#307978: Update 'sarge' and 'releases' web pages

Package: www.debian.org Severity: important The webpage for Debian Releases (http://www.debian.org/releases) and the webpage for Debian GNU/Linux codenamed 'Sarge' (http://www.debian.org/releases/testing) contain inaccurate information. Debian GNU/Linux codenamed 'Sarge' was f

Re: Sarge frozen

Exactly. I'll submit a bug to get the testing and sarge pages updated.   Andrew  On 5/6/05, Scott Mosier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Something along the lines of :   [3 May 2005] Debian "Sarge" repositories are now frozen. Security support now available for "Sarge."

Re: Sarge frozen

Something along the lines of :   [3 May 2005] Debian "Sarge" repositories are now frozen. Security support now available for "Sarge."   Is that what you are thinking about? - Original Message - From: Andrew Donnellan To: debian-www@lists.debian.or

Sarge frozen

Sarge has been frozen for 3 days now, I think it's time to add a news item and update the releases and sarge/testing web pages.   Andrew Donnellan Heritage [GNU/]Linux Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#302739: marked as done (www.debian.org: doc/reference § 2.1.3 says sarge=stable)

Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302739: =?iso-8859-1?Q?www=2Edebia?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2Eorg=3A_doc=2Freference_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#302739: www.debian.org: doc/reference § 2.1.3 says sarge=stable

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-system.en.html, section 2.1.3 says that sarge is the current stable, which is rather confusing for people not up to date with Debian news. -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Sarge MD5SUM

Sorry to bother you but why there is no md5sum file in Sarge folder.I downloaded 1-3 iso files (I386 dated 28 Feb.) but can't find the md5sum nowhere..TNX in advance..Kalin __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam prote

  1   2   >