Re: SPARC port page

2003-01-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:35:49AM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > I recently referred a SPARC user to http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/. He > came back and said that the Debian SPARC port was too old to bother with. > Looking at the page I see, under "Current Status", > > Debian SPARC in Debian G

Re: SPARC port page

2003-01-16 Thread Andrew Shugg
John Hasler said: > I recently referred a SPARC user to http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/. He > came back and said that the Debian SPARC port was too old to bother with. > Looking at the page I see, under "Current Status", > > Debian SPARC in Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (``potato'') uses Linux 2.2 (w

SPARC port page

2003-01-16 Thread John Hasler
I recently referred a SPARC user to http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/. He came back and said that the Debian SPARC port was too old to bother with. Looking at the page I see, under "Current Status", Debian SPARC in Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (``potato'') uses Linux 2.2 (which