* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-02 10:46]:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Cesar Mendoza wrote:
>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
> This does not seem very useful. Do you mean that:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> would change into
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Cesar Mendoza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The default look is something like this:
>
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
This does not seem very useful. Do you mean that:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
would change into
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:08:55PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> > I don't think that's "unusual" or any kind of exception. Short of
> > things like libel, anything I say on the Debian lists should get
> > archived, whether it's something someo
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 04:10:30PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I don't think that's "unusual" or any kind of exception. Short of
> > things like libel, anything I say on the Debian lists should get
> > archived, whether it's something someone else doesn't want published
> > or not.
>
> We're
On 9/1/02 5:08 PM, Thomas Bushnell, BSG enlightened us with:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:31:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> Debian does not redact its mailing list archives.
>>
>> It seems from looking at the URL posted that this is an u
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 02:08:55PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> I don't think that's "unusual" or any kind of exception. Short of
> things like libel, anything I say on the Debian lists should get
> archived, whether it's something someone else doesn't want published
> or not.
We're no
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:31:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Debian does not redact its mailing list archives.
>
> It seems from looking at the URL posted that this is an unusual situation --
> the request is coming from someone whose e-mail
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:31:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Debian does not redact its mailing list archives.
It seems from looking at the URL posted that this is an unusual situation --
the request is coming from someone whose e-mail address appears on the To:
line of a message posted by
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 04:00:27PM -0400, Ian L. wrote:
> Please remove my two email addresses that end in "@logicallemon.com" from
> the following URL:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00162.html
>
> Thank you.
Debian does not redact its mailing list archives
Please remove my two email addresses that end in "@logicallemon.com" from
the following URL:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00162.html
Thank you.
--
Ian L.
http://www.logicallemon.com/
- Perl, Mac OS X, Zsh, Vim
- bass guitar, downtempo electronica
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:46:48PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Adding some twists to make e-mail address not too obvious to the stupid
> spam crawler may still be useful.
One thing which already defeats 90% of those stupid spam spiders is to
encode the "mailto:"; and "@" in email addresses, e.g. "&
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:13:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Only the usual ones about letting the spammers win, crippling those who
> read from the archives and might want to contact one, etc.
I agree. More than once I have found an address I was looking for in the
webarchives. It wouldn't be coo
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:13:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Josip Rodin wrote:
> > That sounds acceptable to me. Does anyone have any objections?
>
> Only the usual ones about letting the spammers win, crippling those who
> read from the archives and might want to contact one, etc.
E-mail addres
Josip Rodin wrote:
> That sounds acceptable to me. Does anyone have any objections?
Only the usual ones about letting the spammers win, crippling those who
read from the archives and might want to contact one, etc.
--
see shy jo
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Cesar Mendoza wrote:
> The default look is something like this:
>
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That sounds acceptable to me. Does anyone have any objections?
(This should wait at least until Monday.)
--
2. That which causes joy or
Hi,
The default look is something like this:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bye
Cesar Mendoza
http://www.kitiara.org
--
"The three golden rules to ensure computer security:
Do not own a computer, do not power it on, and do not use it."
--Robert T. Morris
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 0
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 09:00:30AM -0500, Cesar Mendoza wrote:
> Mhonarc supports email mangling using the tag. I added
> to the debian.rc, but right now is commented. Once enabled (If we decide
> to do it), we are going to have to regenerate the whole archive.
What exactly does it do to the ema
Hi Joy,
Mhonarc supports email mangling using the tag. I added
to the debian.rc, but right now is commented. Once enabled (If we decide
to do it), we are going to have to regenerate the whole archive.
Bye
Cesar Mendoza
http://www.kitiara.org
--
"The three golden rules to ensure computer securit
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:24:36PM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote:
> > Read the rest of the disclaimer, it also says:
> >
> > Debian disclaims all warranties with regard to information posted on its
> > mailing lists, whether posted by Debian or others; this disclaimer includes
> > all implied warr
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:23:37PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Read the rest of the disclaimer, it also says:
>
> Debian disclaims all warranties with regard to information posted on its
> mailing lists, whether posted by Debian or others; this disclaimer includes
> all implied warranties of merch
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:04:32PM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote:
> > This was posted to a Debian Project mailing list. These mailing lists are
> > public forums using SMTP (e-mail), and they are freely distributed to
> > thousands of subscribers around the world, as well as to several web page
> >
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:35:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> This was posted to a Debian Project mailing list. These mailing lists are
> public forums using SMTP (e-mail), and they are freely distributed to
> thousands of subscribers around the world, as well as to several web page
> archives. It
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:45:10AM -0400, Ian L. wrote:
> Please remove my two email addresses, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the following URL:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00162.html
This was posted to a Debian Project mailing list. Thes
Please remove my two email addresses, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED], from the following URL:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00162.html
Thank you.
--
Ian L.
http://www.logicallemon.com/
- Perl, Mac OS X, Zsh, Vim
- bass guitar, downtempo el
24 matches
Mail list logo
