Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-06 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-05 14:47]: > Josip Rodin wrote: >> Or maybe just keep the checked sites normal, and the rest in >> ... (could not be verified, beware!). > > Only problem with is text mode browsers, which can generally at > least display bold. Hmm, doing both doesn't look

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-05 Thread Joey Hess
Josip Rodin wrote: > That would be much better, indeed! > > Or maybe just keep the checked sites normal, and the rest in > ... (could not be verified, beware!). Only problem with is text mode browsers, which can generally at least display bold. Hmm, doing both doesn't look too bad though. Here

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-05 Thread Richard Atterer
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:30:32AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > Joey Hess said: > > One other thing I could do is change the intro text to something like.. > > > >Mirrors listed below in bold have recently been verified to > >contain at least CD image #1 for the i386 architecture. Mirrors

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-05 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:50:40AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > One other thing I could do is change the intro text to something like.. > >Mirrors listed below in bold have recently been verified to >contain at least CD image #1 for the i386 architecture. Mirrors not >listed in bold may b

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-05 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:27:15AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > > (On related note, I need to check out that WebDAV module for Apache, > > apparently it provides machine-parseable directory indices via HTTP.) > > It does, and it's great, but it'll only help you for mirror sites that > are running

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-05 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:47:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Correction... if we're going to bother with a solution, then it should be > > complete. Your program certainly can be considered an improved output, but > > given the amount of false positives already noticed, it seems as if we're > > s

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Andrew Shugg
Joey Hess said: > One other thing I could do is change the intro text to something like.. > >Mirrors listed below in bold have recently been verified to >contain at least CD image #1 for the i386 architecture. Mirrors not >listed in bold may be out of date or down. > > And list everyt

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Andrew Shugg
Josip Rodin said: > (On related note, I need to check out that WebDAV module for Apache, > apparently it provides machine-parseable directory indices via HTTP.) It does, and it's great, but it'll only help you for mirror sites that are running apache+mod_dav (or some other DAV-capable web server)

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
Josip Rodin wrote: > Correction... if we're going to bother with a solution, then it should be > complete. Your program certainly can be considered an improved output, but > given the amount of false positives already noticed, it seems as if we're > switching from one half-solution to another. My

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:48:59AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Why do you think that not pruning dead mirrors from the list is going to > make the maintainers of those mirrors more liable to fix them. I have come to realize that people sometimes simply don't know that their mirrors are outdated/brok

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:46:15PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > And I certianly don't see the benefit of leaving things in the unusable > > state they are when a much improved though admittedly not perfect list > > is already available. > > I say if we're going to bother with it at all, let's fix

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
One other thing I could do is change the intro text to something like.. Mirrors listed below in bold have recently been verified to contain at least CD image #1 for the i386 architecture. Mirrors not listed in bold may be out of date or down. And list everything, with the known-good ftp

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:34:50AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Listing http:// links when only ftp:// ones are verified. > > > > Well as I see it, we have three choices: > > > > 1. Leave things as they are, with dozens of known to be broken ftp and > >http links. > > 2.

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:34:50AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Listing http:// links when only ftp:// ones are verified. > > Well as I see it, we have three choices: > > 1. Leave things as they are, with dozens of known to be broken ftp and >http links. > 2. At least make sure all the ftp lin

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
era eriksson wrote: > I'm afraid your definition of "down" is a bit restrictive. I believe > that e.g. mirrors.sunsite.dk will actually work for users in .dk but > not allow access to others. I'm not sure if this is a happy solution, > but the benefit of their mirroring anything at all is certainly

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:22:01PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > > I hope the rest of my patch can be applied.. > > > > > > I still wouldn't apply it because of the HTTP/FTP dependency. > > > > Don't know what you mean by that. > > Listing http:// links when only ftp:// ones

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 08:22:01PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > I hope the rest of my patch can be applied.. > > > > I still wouldn't apply it because of the HTTP/FTP dependency. > > Don't know what you mean by that. Listing http:// links when only ftp:// ones are verified. -- 2. That wh

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-04 Thread era eriksson
Sorry for not having proper References:, I am not on the list and so have to refer to the web archive which doesn't display Message-Id. On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:55:37 -0500, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The fields are chosen so we can run this program every few days, > and stop pointing

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-03 Thread Joey Hess
Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 07:23:20PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > I hope the rest of my patch can be applied.. > > I still wouldn't apply it because of the HTTP/FTP dependency. Don't know what you mean by that. -- see shy jo pgpVW4pMI7Sl7.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:15:01PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: > > (Wouldn't it be great if the underlying issue was fixed and we could > > simply email mirror maintainers telling them what to do and simply > > delist their CD mirrors if they don't do that...) > > I think we should "actively enc

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-03 Thread Richard Atterer
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 12:33:55PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > (Wouldn't it be great if the underlying issue was fixed and we could > simply email mirror maintainers telling them what to do and simply > delist their CD mirrors if they don't do that...) I think we should "actively encourage" a unif

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 07:23:20PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > I hope the rest of my patch can be applied.. I still wouldn't apply it because of the HTTP/FTP dependency. It's relatively safe for ftp.*.debian.org where we explicitely require both to work at all times, but for other sites it's just ca

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-03 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Josip Rodin | > > > Index: english/mirror/mirror_list.pl | > > > === | > > > -open SRC, "<$mirror_source" || | > > > +open(SRC, "<$mirror_source") || | > > | > > Easy on the formatting... :) | > | > That's not formatting, the ||

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-02 Thread Andrew Shugg
Andrew Shugg said: > Josip Rodin said: > > > > > Index: english/mirror/mirror_list.pl > > > > > === > > > > > -open SRC, "<$mirror_source" || > > > > > +open(SRC, "<$mirror_source") || > > > > > > > > Easy on the formatting... :) > >

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-02 Thread Andrew Shugg
Josip Rodin said: > > > > Index: english/mirror/mirror_list.pl > > > > === > > > > -open SRC, "<$mirror_source" || > > > > +open(SRC, "<$mirror_source") || > > > > > > Easy on the formatting... :) > > > > That's not formatting, the |

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-02 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:47:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > That's too optimistic, sadly. On a number of occasions I've seen people > > suddenly "forget" to configure their Apaches after an upgrade or something. > > It's usually that they only care about FTP for whatever reason and don't > > bot

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-02 Thread Joey Hess
Joey Hess wrote: > See the graph I posted to the gentoo thread. This page is a dead-end for > anyone who wants a cd image via jigdo or from a mirror; all it lets you > get currently is a unofficial netinst iso. Any yet it's linked > prominently on the homepage. The patch aims to make it no longer b

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-02 Thread Joey Hess
Josip Rodin wrote: > That's too optimistic, sadly. On a number of occasions I've seen people > suddenly "forget" to configure their Apaches after an upgrade or something. > It's usually that they only care about FTP for whatever reason and don't > bother to check up on HTTP. However, it's much har

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-02 Thread Scott Kveton
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 06:55:37PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > And I've modified mirror_list.pl to use the new fields to generate a list > that has only known-good mirrors on it. I took the approach of assuming > that a site's http mirror is good if its ftp mirror checks out ok. As far as your scr

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-12-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 06:55:37PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > And I've modified mirror_list.pl to use the new fields to generate a list > that has only known-good mirrors on it. I took the approach of assuming > that a site's http mirror is good if its ftp mirror checks out ok. That's too optimisti

Re: state of the cdrom mirrors report

2002-11-30 Thread Joey Hess
I've more or less funished up the program to check the status of our ftp cdrom mirrors. My program generates a Mirrors.masterlist.status file, with some fields to indicate the state of the mirrors. The fields are chosen so we can run this program every few days, and stop pointing to a mirror if it