Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-12 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-12 23:02, Nicolas François wrote: > That's not something that should be changed now, but after Lenny is > released, you should try ... That sounds awesome. I'll try that after release. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-12 Thread Nicolas François
Hello, On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:45:28PM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > I think, we can/should optimize po4a. It was already slow (with > slow = "po4a-translate takes a significant part of the > compilation time"), but got even a little bit slower in lenny. That's not something that should

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-12 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-12 16:37, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > The manual runs did make me much more happier: Good! > an shortly afterwards started second run did take 45 minutes. It's still > quite some time, but it does for the moment eliminate the overlapping of > often runs. Further optimization though would

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-12 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Gerfried Fuchs [2009-02-12 10:00:13 CET]: > * W. Martin Borgert [2009-02-12 09:33:18 CET]: > > I just found a work-around for #514932, I believe. The specific > > call to xsltproc does not happen, if one calls dblatex with > > --no-external. We don't use "external" data in the release > > notes

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-12 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-12 10:00, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > I will give it a manual run and see how long it takes. Hopefully we can > call the case closed then and I can reactivate the automatic build in > the often run again. Maybe you could do two things: - measure "make pdf LINGUA=en architecture=armel" a

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-12 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* W. Martin Borgert [2009-02-12 09:33:18 CET]: > On 2009-02-12 08:13, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > On 2009-02-11 23:37, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > >Now I discovered, that there is a bug in dblatex: In one case > > >it "forgets" to pass the options to xsltproc. Patch attached > > >for

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-12 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-12 08:13, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2009-02-11 23:37, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > >Now I > >discovered, that there is a bug in dblatex: In one case it > >"forgets" to pass the options to xsltproc. Patch attached > >for review. > > How would we get the patch onto the s

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
W. Martin Borgert (12/02/2009): > On 2009-02-11 23:37, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > >Now I > >discovered, that there is a bug in dblatex: In one case it > >"forgets" to pass the options to xsltproc. Patch attached > >for review. > > How would we get the patch onto the system? Via ba

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-12 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-11 23:37, W. Martin Borgert wrote: >Now I >discovered, that there is a bug in dblatex: In one case it >"forgets" to pass the options to xsltproc. Patch attached >for review. How would we get the patch onto the system? Via backports? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-11 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:26:37PM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote: >Locally, via the XML catalog system, are accessed the XSL >stylesheets of the docbook-xsl package. Is this package >installed (standard etch version, no backport required). Yes. -- Matt

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-11 Thread W. Martin Borgert
[Note: I filed #514932 about the issue.] On 2009-02-11 08:22, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Alright, this is getting ridiculous. Did anyone actually try the build > on an etch system before it was dumped on us? What times did it take? It > is now building since over 8 hours and still not finished. ...

Re: release notes building time...: dblatex bug?

2009-02-11 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-11 08:22, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Alright, this is getting ridiculous. Did anyone actually try the build > on an etch system before it was dumped on us? What times did it take? It > is now building since over 8 hours and still not finished. ... > My impression is that the time is curren

Re: release notes building time ...

2009-02-11 Thread Jens Seidel
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 08:47:09AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Luk Claes [2009-02-11 08:36:26 CET]: > > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > It's probably downloading DTD. xsltproc has this option: > > >--nonet > > >Do not use the Internet to fetch DTDs, entities or documents. >

Re: release notes building time ...

2009-02-10 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Luk Claes [2009-02-11 08:36:26 CET]: > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > >> I've noticed the same thing several times, and it hangs in that state > >> for quite a bit. The question is: Why does it (need to) query external > >> websites? > > > > It's probab

Re: release notes building time ...

2009-02-10 Thread Luk Claes
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> I've noticed the same thing several times, and it hangs in that state >> for quite a bit. The question is: Why does it (need to) query external >> websites? > > It's probably downloading DTD. xsltproc has this option: >

Re: release notes building time ...

2009-02-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > I've noticed the same thing several times, and it hangs in that state > for quite a bit. The question is: Why does it (need to) query external > websites? It's probably downloading DTD. xsltproc has this option: --nonet Do not use the

Re: release notes building time ...

2009-02-10 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! * W. Martin Borgert [2009-02-10 13:21:35 CET]: > Zitat von "Gerfried Fuchs" : > > Again I feel the need to raise my voice about the building time of the > >release notes. I just had to kill it once again because it was running > >_way_ too long. I am thinking of moving the release not

Re: release notes building time ...

2009-02-10 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-10 13:14, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Again I feel the need to raise my voice about the building time of the > release notes. I just had to kill it once again because it was running > _way_ too long. I am thinking of moving the release note building from > the often cronjob (every four hour

Re: release notes building time ...

2009-02-10 Thread Nicolas François
Hello, On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:21:35PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > My impression is, that the time is mostly spend in po4a-translate. > AFAIK, the release-notes are not the only ones using po4a. So I > wonder: What are we doing wrong, that the release notes take so > long? (Maybe my imp

Re: release notes building time ...

2009-02-10 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Zitat von "Gerfried Fuchs" : Again I feel the need to raise my voice about the building time of the release notes. I just had to kill it once again because it was running _way_ too long. I am thinking of moving the release note building from the often cronjob (every four hours) to once a day to