Re: packages.debian.org is frequently unavailable (503 Service Unavailable)

Is it possible that it is rate limited? e.g. delayed response (like 30s) before responding 503? On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 10:21 PM Vivian Pots wrote: > > I have also been experiencing this when connected to a VPN, causing > packages.debian.org to be nearly unusable. > >

Re: packages.debian.org is frequently unavailable (503 Service Unavailable)

I have also been experiencing this when connected to a VPN, causing packages.debian.org to be nearly unusable.

Re: packages.debian.org is frequently unavailable (503 Service Unavailable)

On Wed Apr 9, 2025 at 3:48 PM BST, Erik Schulz wrote: When accessing a page for a package, e.g. https://packages.debian.org/source/stable-backports/firmware-nonfree it is frequently slow or fails. It's possibly caused by a VPN block or rate limiter, but if that's the case, these are static pages

Re: packages.debian.org error 503

Been seeing the same on and off recently, including from a couple hours ago to right now when I try to load [0]. Similarly, packages site requests that are served by www.debian.org (128.31.0.52, ill-connection.csail.mit.edu) are perfectly fine for me. For example, [1] serves quickly, but [2] do

Processed: Re: packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1016694 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow Added tag(s) confirmed. > owner -1 ! Bug #1016694 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow Owner recorded as Akbarkhon Variskhanov . -- 101

Re: packages.debian.org does not show bullseye-security packages

On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 12:36 -0800, Forest wrote: > No comments?  The site itself says to come here to report problems.  > Is there a better place to report this one? Thanks for the report, but this issue is already known: https://bugs.debian.org/992258 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/Pau

Re: packages.debian.org does not show bullseye-security packages

On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:39:30 -0800, Forest wrote: >I recently noticed that packages.debian.org does not show the current >version of a package if it comes from bullseye-security. This makes the >site considerably less useful for tasks like checking CVE patch >availability. > >Could it be an overs

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: packages.debian.org: missing security updates for bullseye

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 www.debian.org Bug #998172 [whohas] packages.debian.org: reports incorrect info to 'whohas' Bug reassigned from package 'whohas' to 'www.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #998172 to the same values previously set Ignoring reque

Re: packages.debian.org: missing security updates for bullseye

Control: reassign -1 www.debian.org Control: user www.debian@packages.debian.org Control: usertags -1 + packages Control: retitle -1 packages.debian.org: missing security updates for bullseye Control: forcemerge 992258 -1 On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:17:25 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > That's not

Processed: Re: packages.debian.org: file list broken for some Sid packages

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 ! Bug #977006 {Done: Rhonda D'Vine } [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken for some packages Bug #977743 {Done: Rhonda D'Vine } [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on sid/testing arch:all packages - no

Processed: Re: packages.debian.org: file list broken for some packages

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #977743 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on sid/testing arch:all packages - not processing Contents-all.gz ? Bug #977006 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken for some packages Ignoring req

Processed: Re: packages.debian.org: file list broken for some packages

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #977006 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken for some packages Bug #977743 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on sid/testing arch:all packages - not processing Contents-all.gz ? Added tag(s)

Re: packages.debian.org only shows packages for sid and experimental

On 01.07.20 11:24, Imre Jonk wrote: > Something is off with packages.debian.org, it only shows packages for > sid and experimental. Take the postfix package for example: > > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=postfix Seems to be OK as of today

Re: packages.debian.org: outdated suite names?

On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 9:23 PM Holger Wansing wrote: > However, there has been no update after releasing Buster. > Are such changings no longer required? > (I wonder, why no wrong suitenames can be seen at packages.debian.org...) I expect they are required by something, to find out you could dele

Re: packages.debian.org filelist seems to show old entry

在 2018年7月8日星期日 CST 上午12:30:00，Ulrike Uhlig 写道： > Hi! > > A bug has been reported on tails-installer saying that > packages.debian.org seems to relate to an executable of tails-installer: > > It shows tails-installer-launcher instead of tails-installer (this was > modified 6+ months ago). > > $ w

Re: packages.debian.org git moved to salsa

Rhonda D'Vine 于2018年5月20日周日 下午4:58写道： > Hi, > the packages.debian.org git now is moved to salsa under > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages > If you need access for translation work and don't have yet, please > speak up and let us know so we can add you. I'm still trying

Re: packages.debian.org

Hello Rhonda, as described in IRC too, e.g thunderbird arm64 and thunderbird-l10n-de I will look. Maybe I can reproduce some more packages. Regards Mechtilde Am 09.05.2018 um 13:03 schrieb Rhonda D'Vine: >Hey Mechtilde, > > * Mechtilde Stehmann [2018-05-02 07:42:58 CEST]: >> Hello, >>

Re: packages.debian.org

Hey Mechtilde, * Mechtilde Stehmann [2018-05-02 07:42:58 CEST]: > Hello, > > I use the site packages.deian.org to see which files are in a package. > > Since some times I want to use it I get the error > > No packages in this suite at this architecture > (translated from German) What spec

Bug#883603: Fwd: Re: packages.debian.org layout

rjona Mensaje reenviado Asunto: Re: packages.debian.org layout Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 01:18:10 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-www@lists.debian.org Fecha: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 11:59:54 +1100 De: Svetlana Tkachenko Para: debian-www@lists.debian.org > http://packages.de

Re: packages.debian.org layout

> http://packages.debian.org > To report a problem with the web site, e-mail our publicly archived mailing > list debian-www@lists.debian.org. Would put the search boxes at the top of the page one after another, horizontally. This way it would be quicker for everyone, they would not need to scrol

Re: packages.debian.org search broken?

On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 22:03 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > https://packages.debian.org/jessie/amd64/libqmi-utils/filelist > > lists "/usr/bin/qmicli" but > > https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=bin%2Fqmicl&mode=path&suite=stable&arch=any > > does not find it. Is t

Re: packages.debian.org bug query

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > Hi Anatoly > > El 15 de enero de 2017 19:49:38 CET, anatoly techtonik > escribió: >>Hi. >> >>How can I list all issues for https://packages.debian.org ? >>This report includes them along with issues for other Debian web sites, >>but I

Re: packages.debian.org bug query

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Both bugs have multiple usertags, including "packages". I'm guessing > that it should be removed in each case. #623586 is a general website design bug with a specific complaint about how the stylesheet affects packages.d.o so I'd keep both

Re: packages.debian.org bug query

On Sun, 2017-01-15 at 22:09 +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=packages;users=www.debian@packages.debian.org > > But I'm not sure why that query shows a bug about www.debian.org content and > another bug about www.debian.org design. The rest l

Re: packages.debian.org bug query

Hi Anatoly El 15 de enero de 2017 19:49:38 CET, anatoly techtonik escribió: >Hi. > >How can I list all issues for https://packages.debian.org ? >This report includes them along with issues for other Debian web sites, >but I don't see how to filter them out. > >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkg

Re: packages.debian.org

Dear Jaap! * Jaap Keuter [2015-04-28 07:56:17 CEST]: > On the page packages.debian.org the order of releases is > > [squeeze] [squeeze-lts] [wheezy] [wheezy-backports] [jessie] [sid] [stretch] > > which, in order of age, or immaturity if you will, should have sid at the far > right, with st

Re: packages.debian.org

On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 06:17:44PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > On Sat Nov 01, 2014 at 00:58:00 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > On Fri Oct 31, 2014 at 11:43:13 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > > Geert Stappers [2014-10-29 06:31:04 CET]: > > > > > > > > I have seen the request for help.

Re: packages.debian.org

Hi, On Sat Nov 01, 2014 at 00:58:00 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri Oct 31, 2014 at 11:43:13 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > * Geert Stappers [2014-10-29 06:31:04 CET]: > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:01:45PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > > On Tue Oct 28, 2014 at 2

Re: packages.debian.org

Hi, On Fri Oct 31, 2014 at 11:43:13 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Geert Stappers [2014-10-29 06:31:04 CET]: > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:01:45PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > On Tue Oct 28, 2014 at 22:55:44 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > A short 'done' or 'fixed' in response

Re: packages.debian.org

* Geert Stappers [2014-10-29 06:31:04 CET]: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:01:45PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > On Tue Oct 28, 2014 at 22:55:44 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > A short 'done' or 'fixed' in response to the original posting > > > would have said "it has been handled, thanks

Re: packages.debian.org

Hi, On Wed Oct 29, 2014 at 06:31:04 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:01:45PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > On Tue Oct 28, 2014 at 22:55:44 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:25:01 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > On Sb, 25 oct 14, 20:31:25,

Re: packages.debian.org

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:01:45PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > On Tue Oct 28, 2014 at 22:55:44 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:25:01 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Sb, 25 oct 14, 20:31:25, Mechtilde wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I'm missing update of the

Re: packages.debian.org

Hi, On Tue Oct 28, 2014 at 22:55:44 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:25:01 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Sb, 25 oct 14, 20:31:25, Mechtilde wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm missing update of the package information > > > > > > Many packages are updated these days befo

Re: packages.debian.org

Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:25:01 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Sb, 25 oct 14, 20:31:25, Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm missing update of the package information > > > > Many packages are updated these days before the freeze but the website > > named above didn't show the newest versions. >

Re: packages.debian.org

On Sb, 25 oct 14, 20:31:25, Mechtilde wrote: > Hello, > > I'm missing update of the package information > > Many packages are updated these days before the freeze but the website > named above didn't show the newest versions. Can you point to some specific examples? Kind regards, Andrei -- htt

Re: packages.debian.org file search not working properly

Hello Ben, thanks for your prompt response. Il 25/09/2014 12:53, Ben Armstrong ha scritto: Riccardo, On 25/09/14 05:35 AM, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote: https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=ecrm1000.tfm works fine. And this is a search against stable "wheezy", whic

Re: packages.debian.org file search not working properly

Riccardo, On 25/09/14 05:35 AM, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote: > searching this specific file with the web interface does not produce > results. > > https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=ecrm1000.tfm&mode=path&suite=unstable&arch=any > This is a search specifically against

Re: packages.debian.org wrong mime type for .deb

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Viinamäki Mikko wrote: > Looks like p.d.o serves .deb files packages.debian.org does not serve any .deb files, those come from the mirror you choose. Debian does not control the mime types delivered by our mirror operators. > Wouldn't it make more sense to use th

Re: packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/ ERROR

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:00 AM, quidame wrote: > since a few days, it seems that the 'wheezy-backports' suite is missing > on packages.debian.org: This is fixed now, thanks for the report. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.deb

Re: packages.debian.org/search - debDroid (pdo on mobile devices)

Hello Philipp, On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:56:52PM +0200, Philipp Mangelow wrote: > first I want to say thank you, that you give us also the option to > search for packages(-informations) with a webbrowser. > > I made an Android app, that actually scraps the most interesting parts > from a search

Re: packages.debian.org

Hello Simon, Am 27.05.2013 21:33, schrieb Simon Paillard: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Mechtilde wrote: >> when can we expect seeing the informations of wheezy backports at >> packages.debian.org? > > It should be ok now. > Thanks, Kind regards Mechtilde signature.

Re: packages.debian.org

Hi, On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Mechtilde wrote: > when can we expect seeing the informations of wheezy backports at > packages.debian.org? It should be ok now. -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: packages.debian.org dead changelog links

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Gerald Turner wrote: > Unfortunately the past few days the Debian changelog links have been > 404. The service has moved to a new location. We hope to get some redirection in place but until then please look at the new location. http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.o

Re: packages.debian.org not updated

Hello Folks, Excerpt from me: > Hello > > it seems to me that packages.debian.org isn't updated since maybe two days. -- -- This has been fixed. Thanks a lot! -- Regards, Thilo 4096R/0xC70B1A8F 721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0 C70B 1A8F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-re

Re: packages.debian.org doesn't seem to know armhf and s390x are in testing

On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 12:07:16AM +, peter green wrote: > Simon Paillard wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:33:54AM +, peter green wrote: > >>Could someone fix packages.debian.org so that armhf and s390x > >>packages in testing show up? > > > > Thanks for the notice, it should be fixed a

Re: packages.debian.org doesn't seem to know armhf and s390x are in testing

Simon Paillard wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:33:54AM +, peter green wrote: Could someone fix packages.debian.org so that armhf and s390x packages in testing show up? Thanks for the notice, it should be fixed at the next mirror run. hmm, how often do mirror runs happen?

Re: packages.debian.org doesn't seem to know armhf and s390x are in testing

Hi, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:33:54AM +, peter green wrote: > Could someone fix packages.debian.org so that armhf and s390x > packages in testing show up? Thanks for the notice, it should be fixed at the next mirror run. -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@

Re: packages.debian.org misses oldstable selection

Hi! * Moritz Mühlenhoff [2011-02-13 21:57:58 CET]: > at packages.debian.org, it'c currently not possible to select "oldstable" > as the distribution to search for (except by searching for "any") Actually, it is, it's on www.debian.org/distrib/packages where it isn't possible to select ol

Re: packages.debian.org search issues

> From: Gerfried Fuchs > * Chris Rempel [2011-02-10 02:20:43 CET]: > > When searching for the packages "python-json" does not produced the > > expected results: > >  It does so for me, at least now. Please notice that there were troubles > with the backend data of the site and your troubles might

Re: packages.debian.org search issues

Hi! * Chris Rempel [2011-02-10 02:20:43 CET]: > When searching for the packages "python-json" does not produced the > expected results: It does so for me, at least now. Please notice that there were troubles with the backend data of the site and your troubles might had been related to t

Re: packages.debian.org search missing results (most)

* Simon Waters [2011-02-09 14:40:59 CET]: > Search for "system-tools-backends" reports it is only in sid. Watch for updates on the issue. Thanks, Rhonda -- "What are the differences between Mark Zuckerber

Re: packages.debian.org missing package data

* Dominic Benson [2011-02-09 12:52:22 CET]: > You may well already know this, but packages.debian.org is not currently > showing any packages under: Yes, we do: Watch for updates on the issue. Thanks, R

Re: packages.debian.org issue

Hi, On Wed Feb 09, 2011 at 11:43:09 +0100, Daniel Rode wrote: > > Hi, > > it seems like packages.debian.org is not working properly. When I search > for iceweasel package, I get information: Please watch http://bugs.debian.org/612561 for updates to the issue, it's worked on. Cheers, Martin --

Re: [packages.debian.org] Please index udebs in experimental

Simon Paillard (11/01/2011): > Done. > > http://git.debian.org/?p=webwml/packages.git;a=commit;h=1cd6b78f69f171c418386ed2d6ce4fd5e1e9570a Thanks! KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [packages.debian.org] Please index udebs in experimental

Hi, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 04:53:07AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > mailing debian-www@ per packages.debian.org's footer, even though I > thought there was some plan to add a more specific footer pointing > (directly) to the people behind this service, Now people from webteam are in packages.d

Re: packages.debian.org webinterface

Hi, On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:49:19AM +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > It would be really great if you could change the form-defaults for the > website at p.d.o so that the default distribution is always "any". We have two forms, could you precise the one you meant ?: * http://www.debian

Re: packages.debian.org translation

On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 02:40:16PM +0200, helix84 wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:23, Simon > Paillard wrote: > > You can sent patches on the list / on the www.debian.org pseudopackage > > in the Debian Bug Tracking System. > > New Slovak files attached. Thanks Ivan, files added to the git rep

Re: packages.debian.org translation

On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:49:46AM +0200, helix84 wrote: > I'm translating in DDTP but I'd also like to have the interface > showing them translated. I searched a lot but haven't found where I > can translate packages.debian.org. But it has e.g. German translation, > so translation is possible. Th

Re: packages.debian.org

Kevin Price schrieb: > sid is currently missing on packages.debian.org. It's back again. :-) -- Kevin Price http://www.kevin-price.de/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: packages.debian.org: dor -- broken url links

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:28:37AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > FYI, at page: > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/dog > > > The following link to the right is broken: > > Copyright Fixed. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: packages.debian.org and strange behaviour while searching perl

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:56:52PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote: > I'm using search engine to find about perl package > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=perl&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all > > 1) The seach engine shows just perl package. Shouldn't it show other *perl* > packages? > 2) The

Re: packages.debian.org development (git.d.o repo, etc.)

Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess a general "Git for translators" guide would be useful, yeah. > Will try to come up with something. as you maybe noticed, I managed to do my first commit there updating just some Finnish messages. However while working on it, I noticed some p

Re: packages.debian.org development (git.d.o repo, etc.)

On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:04:52AM +0300, Tommi Vainikainen wrote: > I noticed that Finnish translations (po files) are not updated for some > time. I think that also many other translators need very detailed > instructions on how to really make commits there, as git seems to > require a bit differ

Re: packages.debian.org development (git.d.o repo, etc.)

Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You can clone the repository from > ssh://git.debian.org/git/webwml/packages.git > > Changes should generally be pushed to the master branch > (which generally reflects the code running at packages.debian.net). > If they have proven to not break anyth

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:03:15PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But the get serious again: Honestly my motivation to work on > > reenabling access for debwww and webwml would probably have greatly > > improved with, like, patches sent to me... > > Would y

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 02:11:47PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 01:14:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On a related note: since you have admin status on the debwww/webwml > > project accounts on alioth, maybe you could sync them with reality > > (i.e. /intro/organizat

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:03:15PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But the get serious again: Honestly my motivation to work on > > reenabling access for debwww and webwml would probably have greatly > > improved with, like, patches sent to me... > > Would y

Re: packages.debian.org updated

Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But the get serious again: Honestly my motivation to work on > reenabling access for debwww and webwml would probably have greatly > improved with, like, patches sent to me... Would you add a README to your code and leaving a pointer to the new stuff

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 02:11:47PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On a related note: since you have admin status on the debwww/webwml > > project accounts on alioth, maybe you could sync them with reality > > (i.e. /intro/organization) by making the current webmasters admins > > as well and removing

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 01:14:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On a related note: since you have admin status on the debwww/webwml > project accounts on alioth, maybe you could sync them with reality > (i.e. /intro/organization) by making the current webmasters admins > as well and removing s

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On a more general note, I understand the lack of interest to preserve access > for me when I don't contribute to stuff. I didn't make myself useful, so I > got cut off. That's fine. However, I have little understanding for when my > acc

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:55:03AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > The current status is: > > > > - To be able to update the code that is running on puccini one > >will need to have access to puccini and sudo rights to pkg_use

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > > The new code can be found in my git repository. More information at > > > > http://packages.debian.org/about/ > > > > > > Which branch (or do they call that tag? I don't recall any more) is > > > canonical, IOW how do the privile

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:55:03AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > The new code can be found in my git repository. More information at > > > http://packages.debian.org/about/ > > > > Which branch (or do they call that tag? I don't recall any more) is > > canonical, IOW how do the privileges

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:25:46AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:58:12PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > The new code can be found in my git repository. More information at > > http://packages.debian.org/about/ > > Which branch (or do they call that tag? I don't recall

Re: packages.debian.org updated

On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:58:12PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > packages.debian.org was finally updated to the new code base that > was already available some time from packages.debian.net. Yay! :) I guess that was the reason for all those connection refused messages earlier today... :) > -

Re: packages.debian.org seems to have stopped updating.

On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:14:16PM -, peter green wrote: > for example > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=gaim > is still showing testing as having 1:2.0.0+beta4-3 and unstable as having > 1:2.0.0+beta3-4. According to the "lat

Re: packages.debian.org update errors?

On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 02:39:15PM -0400, Stephen Depooter wrote: > The packages.debian.org site seems to be having some errors in its updates. > > In particular the shorewall package is listed as being in unstable and > testing > as version 3.2.4-1, but the link to the testing version package p

Re: packages.debian.org, Hungarian version -- typo

On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:27:26AM +0200, Pallinger P?ter wrote: > Just a small misspelling: > > On the page > 'http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_packages' > "Kulcsz?" (meaning keyword) should be spelled correctly as "Kulcssz?". Thanks for reporting this. It's been fixed. -- Matt

Re: packages.debian.org

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:46:42PM -0400, Jarett DeAngelis wrote: > Can someone get back to me about whether or not I could get my hands on > the scripts you use that run packages.debian.org? I'm loosely > affiliated with the OpenZaurus project (www.openzaurus.org) and we could > really use som

Re: packages.debian.org DOWN

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:21:21PM +0100, Elwin Andriol wrote: > For reasons unknown to me, the packages.debian.org site is down for at > least a couple of hours. > The site (87.106.4.56) also doesn't respond to ping requests. Thanks for reporting this, but we already know about the problem. --

Re: packages.debian.org seems to be down

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:58:15AM +0100, Roger Oshaug wrote: > I am trying to get a newer version than 0.24 of java-package, but it > seems I cant get to it on your web-site. There is no response from > packages.debian.org when searching. I'm not able to contact it either. In fact, I can't eve

Re: packages.debian.org down.... need libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 for AMD64

On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 08:51:17AM -0500, Javi wrote: > I'm running ubuntu's AMD64 "breezy" distro, I need to install java > application server in my machine but it seems to need "libstdc++2.10- > glibc2.2", I've looked everywhere and apparently only > packages.debian.orghas the ia64 version, howev

Re: packages.debian.org update problem

On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 15:31 +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/urlgrabber shows that urlgrabber > 2.9.7-2 was accepted 2005-12-30, but > > http://packages.debian.org/python-urlgrabber shows 2.9.6-2 as the > latest version, as of 2006-01-03. saens.debian.org, aka packages.

Re: packages.debian.org not properly updating?

* Marc Haber: > I had to resort to parsing packages.debian.org output since Debian > does not seem to have a public madison interface. I'm not sure what kind of information you are after, but: The secure-testing archive contains something very similar to madison, based on local copies of the Pack

Re: packages.debian.org not properly updating?

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:25:30PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:29:15AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=clamav-data > > correctly says that unstable has clamav-data 1165, w

Re: packages.debian.org not properly updating?

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:29:15AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=clamav-data > correctly says that unstable has clamav-data 1165, while > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/clamav-data still refers

Re: packages.debian.org virtual section is messed up

On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 06:21:48PM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > packages.debian.org's virtual section seems to be messed up. For example: > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/virtual/libjpeg-dev Thanks for noting. I think I identified the problem and it should be fixed in the next few hours. Gr

Re: packages.debian.org virtual section is messed up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 06.11.2005 um 11:19 schrieb Peter Karlsson: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/virtual/libjpeg-dev Indeed. That looks like a Cyrillic (koi8-u encoded) page, labelled as UTF-8 encoded English... Guess: Ukrainian Seems something with l10n we

Re: packages.debian.org virtual section is messed up

Seo Sanghyeon: > packages.debian.org's virtual section seems to be messed up. For example: > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/virtual/libjpeg-dev Indeed. That looks like a Cyrillic (koi8-u encoded) page, labelled as UTF-8 encoded English... -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ --

Re: packages.debian.org/clamav-data not updating

On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:57:21AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > packages.debian.org/clamav-data still shows version 1084, while 1106 > was uploaded and accepted on Saturday. How often is p.d.o updated, and > is that process currently working? Urgh, caused by a stale lock file. Currently updating, sh

Re: packages.debian.org is down

> From: Steve Work <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: packages.debian.org is down It works for me. Maybe the problem has been repaired. If it is still not working for you, I suggest debugging your network connection to packages.d.o - please contact your local network administrator if appropriate and e

Re: packages.debian.org

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 03:10:38PM +0200, Peter Bartelt wrote: > timeout for hours!!! Seems to work for me currently... Can you confirm this from your side? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: packages.debian.org regeneration problem

On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:14:42PM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > It seems that packages.debian.org is not being updated. > > For example, llvm was accepted Apr 7, but packages.debian.org/llvm > doesn't exist yet. > (See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2005/04/msg00714.html) Indeed, l

Re: packages.debian.org

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:44:23PM +0700, Alan Skelton wrote: > Hello, > > packages.debian.org appears to have been unobtainable for two days now. Correct. The server that hosts it has been down with broken RAID array. Work is being done to attempt to fix it, but it is taking its time. --

Re: packages.debian.org

On Tuesday, April 05, 2005 9:44 AM, Alan Skelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > packages.debian.org appears to have been unobtainable for two days > now. The machine hosting that site (amongst others) is currently experiencing unplanned downtime - see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2

Re: packages.debian.org CGI Perl scripts

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:59:56AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > I cannot seem to find the last code for the Perl scripts in > . > > There is only old code from 2001 at > in > webwml/packages/cgi-bin.

Re: packages.debian.org

> My browser times out when trying to access packages.debian.org, and has been > timing out for the past couple days. Scheduled power outage: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/01/msg00013.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Re: packages.debian.org

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: confirmed On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:37:42AM +0200, Kevin Price wrote: > I have two suggestions to make about improving packages.debian.org. I find > myself using it quite much, and it is very well done. I really missed it in > the time after the att

Re: packages.debian.org is down.

On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 08:35:38PM -0500, Fragger 2000 wrote: > http://packages.debian.org/ has not worked since yesterday. I saw nothing > on your website indicating that you guys know the site is down so I thought > I would let you know. > > All other internet sites are working fine. If you

  1   2   >