Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-25 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > (*)Retrieving the files from .debs is a pain/inefficient due to the following > issues: > - grabbing files from a .deb involves ar and at least one tar (usually two). I have a library that is about a magnitude faster than the ar/tar combination and

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-25 Thread James A. Treacy
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 05:22:11PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > Another thing that we could improve is the serving of > > > /usr/doc/*/{changelog.Debian.gz,changelog.gz,copyright} > > > > Well, depending on demand we can just p

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-24 Thread Joey Hess
Josip Rodin wrote: > That was my original opinion, but hey, it's only ~40% of klecker.d.o's 46GB, > and I don't know what else would need more space than what would be left... Gotta love raid-5'd debian mirrors. :-P -- see shy jo

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-23 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 05:22:11PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Another thing that we could improve is the serving of > > /usr/doc/*/{changelog.Debian.gz,changelog.gz,copyright} > > Well, depending on demand we can just pull them out of their .debs on > request backed by a little db2 cache,

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-22 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > I can easily convert the Packages interface to use an apt-cache so having > a mirror just for that isn't important. The Contents files can also be > easily copied (used for searching for which package(s) contain a file). I wouldn't bother really.. I

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-22 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 12:49:51PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > I was talking to elmo and shaleh on IRC about klecker having a FTP mirror > > the other day. I suggested remotely mounting download.sourceforge.net's > > archive because it's just one hop away, but they didn't like it because t

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 12:49:51PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > I was talking to elmo and shaleh on IRC about klecker having a FTP mirror > > the other day. I suggested remotely mounting download.sourceforge.net's > > archive because it's just one hop away, but they didn't like it because that

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-21 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > lists archives and bugs pages aren't an issue -- they're both rather > independent of the main site now. Right, OK.. > I was talking to elmo and shaleh on IRC about klecker having a FTP mirror > the other day. I suggested remotely mounting download.sou

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-21 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 03:42:44PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > But the plan was to have everything related to web pages on one host, and > > the upgrade to va was supposed to enable that. Now that it happened there's > > no need to have the web pages build on master anymore, klecker can do it

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-20 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > But the plan was to have everything related to web pages on one host, and > the upgrade to va was supposed to enable that. Now that it happened there's > no need to have the web pages build on master anymore, klecker can do it. Oh? Really? Hum, I didn't

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-20 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:57:40AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > but considering klecker.d.o could need the FTP mirror anyway, it's best > > to get it set up right away. > > *blink* Are you confused? We are not trying to move any more to klecker > than was on va before. There was no mirror the

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-20 Thread James A. Treacy
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:57:40AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Jay is probably the right person to setup the mirroring from master to > klecker, but I can do it if he isn't around. > I'm leaving in an hour for 4 days (actually, I'll be back for a few hours on Sunday, but we can ignore that)

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-20 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > but considering klecker.d.o could need the FTP mirror anyway, it's best to > get it set up right away. *blink* Are you confused? We are not trying to move any more to klecker than was on va before. There was no mirror there before, and there isn't going

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-20 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > Additionally, in order to get the mirrors to work correctly, the ~archvsync > user's webmirrors/ subdirectory should be copied over from master.d.o to > klecker.d.o, and then the mirrors should be told to adjust their scripts (if > that's necessary, I thin

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-20 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi people, A full FTP site mirror is needed for the Packages/ web pages to be generated This requirement could be avoided by getting the .dsc files some other way, but considering klecker.d.o could need the FTP mirror anyway, it's best to get it set up right away. Apache should be installed on kl

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-20 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:50:20PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > Will there still be a copy of the web pages on master? > The reason is if there is no copy then the indexer for the searching has > to move too, which probably the whol search stuff should go with it. > > Are the drives there big enoug

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-19 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:40:01AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > The new va.debian.org replacement box is installed and running, mostly. > The mailsystem is not active and only the web team can login right now, > but that won't last too long. > > I would like the web team to prepare it to resume

Re: klecker.debian.org

2000-10-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:40:01AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > The new va.debian.org replacement box is installed and running, mostly. Great! :) > I would like the web team to prepare it to resume it's duty as > www.debian.org ASAP. Please get everything you need mirrored into > /org/www.debi