Re: extra stuff in the headers

2003-02-03 Thread Peter Karlsson
Josip Rodin: > What's a Dublin core meta element? http://dublincore.org/> Overkill, perhaps. > "Sun, Nov 3 02:33:08 UTC 2002" is not human-readable, but "2002-11-03 > 03:33:08" is? You meant it the other way around? Yeah, I did. Sorry. > Whether it's common doesn't quite explain why is it usef

Re: extra stuff in the headers

2003-02-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 03:06:49PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Furthermore, we should use a .png icon instead of a proprierary format. The .ico specification is pretty much available, though, see for example http://services.simac.be/vnc/single/icoFormat.html But that's not really my point. D

Re: extra stuff in the headers

2003-02-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 10:11:06PM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote: > > To get favicon.ico displayed, we need to add more stuff to the headers. > > To force favicon.ico we need a > > > > some browsers (such as Opera 7) only fetches the icon if explicitly > linked. Some will probably go for favico

Re: extra stuff in the headers

2003-02-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dim 02/02/2003 à 22:11, Peter Karlsson a écrit : > Josip Rodin: > > > To get favicon.ico displayed, we need to add more stuff to the headers. > > To force favicon.ico we need a > > > > some browsers (such as Opera 7) only fetches the icon if explicitly > linked. Some will probably go for

Re: extra stuff in the headers

2003-02-02 Thread Peter Karlsson
Josip Rodin: > To get favicon.ico displayed, we need to add more stuff to the headers. To force favicon.ico we need a some browsers (such as Opera 7) only fetches the icon if explicitly linked. Some will probably go for favicon.ico no matter what you write there, though. Explicitly linking t