On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:15:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:02:07 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >> It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert
> >> the social c
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:28:52 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:59:49AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
>> aj or Matt, do you know if there are other location where the
>> social contract is out of date ?
> I don't know of any other out-of-date copies, but I di
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:02:07 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert
>> the social contract back to the original version. Is that going to
>> actually happen at
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:59:49AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote:
> aj or Matt, do you know if there are other location where the social
> contract is out of date ?
I don't know of any other out-of-date copies, but I didn't know that
the web site copy was out-of-date until I read AJ's e-mail.
--
M
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 09:02:07AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert the
> > social contract back to the original version. Is that going to actually
> > happen at s
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert the
> social contract back to the original version. Is that going to actually
> happen at some point?
>
> ] $ lynx -dump http://www.debian.org/social_contract | grep
6 matches
Mail list logo
