consistent usage of aptitude (was Re: Etch errata)

2007-05-30 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Wednesday 30 May 2007 16:39, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > >> > > I thought aptitude was the recommended frontend. > >> > In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are > >> > no complex dependencies to be resolved, you only upgrade existing > >> > packages and there shoul

Re: Etch errata

2007-05-30 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-28 21:49]: > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:38:45PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: >> > > I thought aptitude was the recommended frontend. >> > >> > In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are no >> > complex dependencies to be resolv

Re: Etch errata

2007-05-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:38:45PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I > > > know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used > > > in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the > > >

Re: Etch errata

2007-05-28 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I > > know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used > > in the example

Re: Etch errata

2007-05-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I > know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used > in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the > recommended fron