Re: About consultants page management: email and other compulsory fields

2009-05-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 30. April 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > What about "NMMN"? It is already listed without email address. Should we > delete this entry as well? NMMN afaik hosts at least one .debian.org machine plus two m68k debian.net machines, so I assume they'd like to stay listed. BCC:ing

Re: About consultants page management: email and other compulsory fields

2009-05-01 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Thu,30.Apr.09, 18:52:48, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > We received a request for removal the email field from a consultants > entry. I am wondering if this is possible at all, since (I believe) we > should retain the email address in order to get in touch with the > consultants, or to verify further r

Re: About consultants page management: email and other compulsory fields

2009-04-30 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Il giorno gio, 30/04/2009 alle 13.09 -0700, Don Armstrong ha scritto: > [...] > > There should be a publicly available e-mail address that the > > consultant can be contacted at (and responds to e-mail sent to it > > within four weeks). If the consultant

Re: About consultants page management: email and other compulsory fields

2009-04-30 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il giorno gio, 30/04/2009 alle 13.09 -0700, Don Armstrong ha scritto: [...] > There should be a publicly available e-mail address that the > consultant can be contacted at (and responds to e-mail sent to it > within four weeks). If the consultant doesn't want such an address > published, then they

Re: About consultants page management: email and other compulsory fields

2009-04-30 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Should we just remove the field, or ask for a new email address that > is supposed to replace the old one, or ask for a different email > address that we might keep as comment in consultants.data and we > might use for checking further requests? There s