Rumen Krastev:
> You mean that the script doesn't compare dates of the modifications,
> instead it reads the header and if the header says i'm v1.1 or there
> is no such header it decides that this file is outdate? Bizzare :-/
That's exactly what it does, because that's the only proper way to do
Rumen Krastev:
> No, I don't... but this destructive behavior of the script can
> produce many human conflicts :-/ At least it should send mail, about
> it's intentions,
I don't like mass-spamming people with autogenerated mail. However,
current information about what is happening with the transl
Luk Claes writes:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Rumen Krastev wrote:
> The translation header should mention the translated English revision, so
> it should have been 1.25 probably. As English revision 1.1 is more than 6
> months old, the file would be completely outdated and as such is removed.
You
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Rumen Krastev wrote:
> > The translation header should mention the translated English revision, so
> > it should have been 1.25 probably. As English revision 1.1 is more than 6
> > months old, the file would be completely outdated and as such is removed.
>
> You mean that the s
--Forwarded message --
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Rumen Krastev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Possible error in check_trans.
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Rumen Krastev wrote:
> Hello guys and girls (I hope there is ;-),
> today I founded a strange behavior of purging script, that removes more than
> 6 months outdated translations. One of my translations
> (bulgarian/News/index.wml) was purged from the repository, I wondered what
Hello guys and girls (I hope there is ;-),
today I founded a strange behavior of purging script, that removes more than
6 months outdated translations. One of my translations
(bulgarian/News/index.wml) was purged from the repository, I wondered what
happend and browsed the log - what a suprise:
7 matches
Mail list logo
