On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:03:18PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > If you simply kept the 2.2 vs. 3.0 distinction instead of removing it
> > (without any explanation), there wouldn't be a problem.
>
> Is there really any point in maintaining links to potato netinst
> images?
>
> The distinction
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 12:28:50PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> If you simply kept the 2.2 vs. 3.0 distinction instead of removing it
> (without any explanation), there wouldn't be a problem.
Is there really any point in maintaining links to potato netinst
images?
The distinction between potato/wo
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:49:02PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > could you please check the http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ page?
> > The _first_ netinst link is dead, and the last one is points to
> > something for the obsolete Potato 2.2r4
> > (http://markybobdeb.sourceforge.net/elf/).
>
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 09:27:34PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> could you please check the http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ page?
> The _first_ netinst link is dead, and the last one is points to
> something for the obsolete Potato 2.2r4
> (http://markybobdeb.sourceforge.net/elf/).
The link to t
Hello,
could you please check the http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ page? The
_first_ netinst link is dead, and the last one is points to something
for the obsolete Potato 2.2r4 (http://markybobdeb.sourceforge.net/elf/).
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
--
As of next week, passwords will be entered in Mor
5 matches
Mail list logo
