No progress for the last 7 years :-(
I have just updated the sponsors list manually for now.
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Your message dated Tue, 7 May 2024 21:08:08 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#998672: packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages
have empty filelist
has caused the Debian Bug report #998672,
regarding packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages have empty filelist
to be marked as
Hi, I saw that only some adep/dep link of virtual packages are
supported, for example:
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/cjs
> adep: dh-sequence-gir
> virtual package provided by gobject-introspection
>
> adep: dh-sequence-gnome
> Package not a
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:34:08 +0200
with message-id <25908.35360.525876.37...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #845601,
regarding packages.debian.org: add form to search code of source packages
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:30:44 +0200
with message-id <25908.35156.587659.831...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #742550,
regarding packages.debian.org: include a warning on packages from
contrib/non-free
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:08:54 +0200
with message-id <25908.33846.58991.517...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #450841,
regarding packages.debian.org: old packages should show current maintainer
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:03:40 +0200
with message-id <25908.33532.652250.16...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #207095,
regarding make dates of packages more visible
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:55:39 +0200
with message-id <25908.33051.928143.725...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #129847,
regarding www.debian.org: no way to get info about gone packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2023 12:26:27 +0200
with message-id <25886.36691.248199.584...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #951444,
regarding List packages where maintainer might be unfit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:02:12 +0200
with message-id <25884.11508.992501.262...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #17590,
regarding packages.debian.org: search_contents: search contents of source
packages
to be marked as done.
This mean
unsubscribe me
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:45 PM Thomas Lange wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:27:34 +0200, Cyril Brulebois
> said:
>
> > Probably best to finally drop it, to avoid wasting more brain time on
> > suite updates (for that particular file)?
> Yes, please drop it.
>
> -
rce/oldoldstable/ffmpeg) gives then:
ffmpeg (7:4.1.11-0+deb10u1)
I understand that this may be due to the security / updated version of
those packages that may create such heterogeneity by the time.
Are /metadata.ftp-master.debian.org and
https://sources.debian.org/patches/ not designed to store those
Cyril Brulebois (2023-06-13):
> Let's see if those help:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/compare/f673a47d01...4111b73ede
That wasn't sufficient, because of some earlier check/optimization. And
there was another thing that was missed, which would hav
Let's see if those help:
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/compare/f673a47d01...4111b73ede
As usual, I'm not forcing a refresh right away, and I'll let the next
mirror pulse trigger reindexing. We should have a better idea in 6-12
hours.
Cheers,
--
Cyr
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:38:25 +0200
with message-id <20230613133825.holhtedmhhebn...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1037488: www.debian.org: drop static/packages-site.css
entirely?
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037488,
regarding www.debian.org: drop static/pa
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:27:34 +0200, Cyril Brulebois
> said:
> Probably best to finally drop it, to avoid wasting more brain time on
> suite updates (for that particular file)?
Yes, please drop it.
--
viele Grüße Thomas
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Hi,
Spotted while working on #1037479, static/packages-site.css hardcodes
suite names. But digging a little deeper, it doesn't seem to be imported
anymore, after the huge redesign:
c
Hi Piotr,
Quoting Andrew's answer in full:
Andrew M.A. Cater (2023-02-11):
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 05:22:24PM +, Piotr Lopatka wrote:
> > Hi Debian maintainer,
> >
> > Just reporting that the website seems down as non-free packages are not
> > available f
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 05:22:24PM +, Piotr Lopatka wrote:
> Hi Debian maintainer,
>
> Just reporting that the website seems down as non-free packages are not
> available for install/update. It looks like testing and Sid are affected.
> Debian stable seems fine.
>
Have
Hi Debian maintainer,
Just reporting that the website seems down as non-free packages are not
available for install/update. It looks like testing and Sid are affected.
Debian stable seems fine.
Many thanks,
Piotr
Hi Jochen,
(Answering with my “I have the gid by accident” hat.)
Jochen Sprickerhof (2023-01-20):
> There are more old files that should probably go:
>
> jspricke@picconi:/srv/packages.debian.org/archive/debports$ find -type f
> -mtime +0 -exec ls -l {} \;
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 102
dspu&mode=path&suite=unstable&arch=any
there exist binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu binutils-powerpc64le-linux-gnu packages
on arm64, but they do not. Might be left over from the unofficial arm64 port in
2014?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
It says: "two or more packages specified"
https://packages.debian.org/source/stable-security/firefox-esr
Idézem/Quoting Colomban Wendling :
Hello,
This is still an issue as of today regarding the bullseye-security
section being missing.
See for example the linux-image-amd64 or f
Hello,
This is still an issue as of today regarding the bullseye-security
section being missing.
See for example the linux-image-amd64 or firefox-esr packages:
linux-image-amd64:
- https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=linux-image-amd64
(bullseye shows 5.10.140-1)
- apt policy
Dear maintainer,
A couple of days ago I noticed that the pages for the new packages no
longer update. For instance, the one for experimental still lists gimp
2.99.x and kodi 20a1, which were added like 10 days ago. Likewise, new
packages like the ones made from kernel 5.18 are not listed at
Hi,
I have this problem, too. For example, if you search firefox-esr at
'https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all&exact=1&searchon=names&keywords=firefox-esr',
the latest package version 91.9.0 will not be shown for bullseye.
Best Regards,
Zhang Boyang
Hi,
I've noticed that the bullseye-updates suite doesn't appear to get any search
results in: https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
I suppose this might be because earlier distros can be found on the security
mirror like so:
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/bust
On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 12:36 -0800, Forest wrote:
> No comments? The site itself says to come here to report problems.
> Is there a better place to report this one?
Thanks for the report, but this issue is already known:
https://bugs.debian.org/992258
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/Pau
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:39:30 -0800, Forest wrote:
>I recently noticed that packages.debian.org does not show the current
>version of a package if it comes from bullseye-security. This makes the
>site considerably less useful for tasks like checking CVE patch
>availability.
>
>Could it be an overs
I recently noticed that packages.debian.org does not show the current
version of a package if it comes from bullseye-security. This makes the
site considerably less useful for tasks like checking CVE patch
availability.
Could it be an oversight, perhaps related to the archive layout change that
a
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:07:59 +
with message-id <61ef93bfb3eb7_3e32ab9fe5765c445...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: No list of files for arch:all packages
to be mar
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:07:59 +
with message-id <61ef93bfb3eb7_3e32ab9fe5765c445...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on sid/testing ar
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:07:59 +
with message-id <61ef93bfb3eb7_3e32ab9fe5765c445...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken for some packages
* Vipul Kumar [2021-11-10 11:12]:
The "filelist" feature on packages.debian.org is still broken for some
Sid's packages. Patch indeed worked for Bullseye and Bookworm (neither
of which worked before), but somehow not for Sid. For example, https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/al
Hi,
I'm running Debian bullseye and have firefox 78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1 from
bullseye-security, but packages.debian.org is still showing
78.14.0esr-1~deb11u1 as the firefox-esr version available in Debian
bullseye [1].
So the patch of Rhonda D'Vine, did not have an effect on at least the info
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1 !
Bug #977006 {Done: Rhonda D'Vine } [www.debian.org]
packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken for some packages
Bug #977743 {Done: Rhonda D'Vine } [www.debian.org]
packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on sid/te
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: mo...@debian.org
Hello,
i think this problem has been going on for quite a while (months): all arch:all
packages have empty filelist, f.e.
https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/python3-poetry-core/filelist
please have a look as that piece
Le 17/10/2021 à 20:40, Holger Wansing a écrit :
Users might overlook the "(debian-installer)" hint or don't understand its
meaning.
Holger
Hi, and thanks for your answer. I noticed it but for me, the fact that
these packages are related to the installer doesn't me
ymaps where missing so I've
> searched "keymaps" on the packages
> Website(https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=keymaps).
> I get a list with 8 console-keymaps-* packages. But non of them can be
> inst
quot;keymaps" on the packages
Website(https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=keymaps).
I get a list with 8 console-keymaps-* packages. But non of them can be
installed via apt! I finally found the right virtual package with "
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:00:16 +
with message-id <61241a70a0f88_52212ab33d1465c090...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on sid/testing ar
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:00:16 +
with message-id <61241a70a0f88_52212ab33d1465c090...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: No list of files for arch:all packages
to be mar
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:00:16 +
with message-id <61241a70a0f88_52212ab33d1465c090...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken for some packages
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #977743 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on
sid/testing arch:all packages - not processing Contents-all.gz ?
Bug #977006 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken
for some pack
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Rebecca,
Hi Louis-Philippe,
> On the packages.d.o pages of arch:all packages from sid, bullseye or
> experimental, the "list of files" link gives the error message "No such
> package in this suite on this architecture."
First of all, tha
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #977006 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken
for some packages
Bug #977743 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on
sid/testing arch:all packages - not processing Contents-all.gz
On 06/16/2021 06:36 PM, iio7 wrote:
Hi,
There is a major problem with the search feature on packages.debian.org
It's impossible to search for packages with small names.
Try searching for "php" in order to determine what package versions are
available and you get:
Error
ke
Hi,
There is a major problem with the search feature on packages.debian.org
It's impossible to search for packages with small names.
Try searching for "php" in order to determine what package versions are
available and you get:
Error
keyword too short (keywords need to ha
Zeyinurrofiq 123
Hello,
sebul (2021-03-07):
> I found a typo at
> https://packages.debian.org/ko/buster/task-korean
> 설 치합니다.
> is incorrect
> 설치합니다.
> is correct
> How can I fix it ?
I think you may want to look at:
https://ddtp.debian.org/
https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/ddtp
Cheers,
--
Cyril
Hello.
I found a typo at
https://packages.debian.org/ko/buster/task-korean
설 치합니다.
is incorrect
설치합니다.
is correct
How can I fix it ?
--
https://sebuls.blogspot.kr
Hi!
Not sure if this is the perfect place for this, but I assume I'll get
pointed in the right direxion if it isn't.
As an example, go to
https://packages.debian.org/sid/python-libevdev-doc
whose [list of files] link goes to
https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/python-libevdev-doc/filelist
whi
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
As Scott Talbert pointed out in [1], the "list of files" page for
arch:all packages in bullseye and above currently seems to be broken.
All pages list a yellow notification box with the content
"No such package in this suite on th
Hi,
It seems like file lists for arch all packages on packages.debian.org are
broken? For example:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/pyqt5-dev/filelist
Thanks,
Scott
Hello,
take for example
https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/python3-starlette/filelist , it
only shows an error message "No such package in this suite on this
architecture" ; this is happening for all the packages i look up, but
it seems to be only affecting the `all` arch, f
Package: www.debian.org
On the packages.d.o pages of arch:all packages from sid, bullseye or
experimental, the "list of files" link gives the error message "No such
package in this suite on this architecture."
This does not affect arch:any packages, or packages from
Ok, so more debug info, as apparently as a DD I do have access to
picconi.debian.org
1. The file list data is stored in Berkeley DBs in
srv/packages.debian.org/files/db/contents/filelists_${suite}_${arch}.db
2. The packages I referenced before are missing, but only in certain
archs. For example
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: packages
Dear maintainers,
The "filelist" feature on packages.debian.org has been broken for a
number for days on some packages. I sadly cannot find a common
denominator. It doesn't se
On 01.07.20 11:24, Imre Jonk wrote:
> Something is off with packages.debian.org, it only shows packages for
> sid and experimental. Take the postfix package for example:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=postfix
Seems to be OK as of today
Hi,
Something is off with packages.debian.org, it only shows packages for
sid and experimental. Take the postfix package for example:
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=postfix
Hopefully this can be resolved soon.
Cheers,
Imre
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Your message dated Fri, 01 May 2020 15:01:11 +
with message-id <5eac39b7f29cf_3902ab4bbc0e5b442...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#929389 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #929389,
regarding debian-policy: Broken link in section 3.6 Virtual packages
to be mar
> Packages that reporters worry that the maintainer is otherwise not
> worthy of being the maintainer, and should have a new maintainer.
De we really want a page judging the merits of individual maintainers?
I do not think so.
-Ralf.
Hi folks,
if I click on [buster-backports] on
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/linux-signed-amd64
then I get an internal server error.
Regards
Harri
Hello
El 26/3/19 a las 17:05, Семён Зайцев escribió:
> Hello!
> Error with wheezy.
> "two or more packages specified (git wheezy)"
> https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/git
>
Wheezy is archived, so it's not present in packages.debian.org anymore.
The web understan
Hello!
Error with wheezy.
"two or more packages specified (git wheezy)"
https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/git
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:26:54AM +, w...@debian.org wrote:
> The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
> through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
> last week.
>
> Total number of orphaned packages: 1418 (n
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2019 13:21:26 +
with message-id <20190317132126.ga25...@tack.einval.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#251218: /devel/people gives recognition for quantity
of packages, not quality
has caused the Debian Bug report #251218,
regarding /devel/people gives recog
Arquivos da Bíblia Sagrada
Google Drive
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:09 AM Christian Niemeyer
wrote:
> The links on the site https://historical.packages.debian.org/
This website has not yet been fully setup yet so it isn't surprising
that it is broken. It might be fixed eventually but I've no idea when
the folks responsible will have ti
Hi!
The links on the site https://historical.packages.debian.org/
e.g.
https://historical.packages.debian.org/sarge/
or
https://historical.packages.debian.org/search?keywords=vim
or
https://historical.packages.debian.org/vim
all return 404 Errors. Same for any search operation on the site via th
Your message dated Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:38:42 +0200
with message-id <20181018133842.ga18...@anguilla.debian.or.at>
and subject line filelist working again
has caused the Debian Bug report #875433,
regarding [packages]: File list data hasn't been updated for years
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:39:46 +0200
with message-id <20181018133946.ga25...@anguilla.debian.or.at>
and subject line obsolete bugreport
has caused the Debian Bug report #546793,
regarding packages.debian.org: bogus outdated binary packages in experimental
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:39:46 +0200
with message-id <20181018133946.ga25...@anguilla.debian.or.at>
and subject line obsolete bugreport
has caused the Debian Bug report #546793,
regarding packages.debian.org: displays removed packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you
-- Forwarded message -
From: Ya'aqov Ben Nun
Date: sex, 24 de ago de 2018 03:05
Subject: Re: Debian "Packages" web page confuses the terms "Sections" and
"Components"
To: Paul Wise
Hi. Just giving my to cents to the subject maybe it's a
an.org/debian/dists/unstable/Release
I guess for space reasons, the Packages/Sources files combine the
component with the section:
Section: contrib/misc
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/source/Sources.gz
OTOH, the repository format documentation says:
"Components: A whitespace
Hi,
Parke wrote:
> Hello, debian-www@lists.debian.org,
>
> I believe the Debian "Packages" web page confuses the terms "Sections"
> and "Components".
>
> The page is here:
> https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
>
> Scroll down to: &q
Hello, debian-www@lists.debian.org,
I believe the Debian "Packages" web page confuses the terms "Sections"
and "Components".
The page is here:
https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
Scroll down to: "Search package directories"
Note the following select
root page.
Please correct this.
Thanks!
-Theral Mackey
Please consider always using the Vcs-*: fields from packages in
unstable, even if displaying a package version from stable or older.
Currently, the packages.debian.org website shows zillions of dead
Alioth Vcs-Browser: links to git.
gt; >
>> >
>> >Having trouble with Kicad 4.0.5 I am using Debian 9.4.
>> >I tried to jump over to the packages from stretch-backports for
>> >productive usage, but just got error two or more packages specified
>> >(kicad stretch-backorts)
>>
&
在 2018年6月26日星期二 CST 下午9:33:43，Laura Arjona Reina 写道：
> Hello Isaac
>
> El 26 de junio de 2018 8:09:59 CEST, isaac shields
escribió:
> >Error
> >
> >
> >
> >Having trouble with Kicad 4.0.5 I am using Debian 9.4.
> >I tried to jump over to the pack
Hello Isaac
El 26 de junio de 2018 8:09:59 CEST, isaac shields
escribió:
>
>Error
>
>
>
>Having trouble with Kicad 4.0.5 I am using Debian 9.4.
>I tried to jump over to the packages from stretch-backports for
>productive usage, but just got error two or more pa
Error
Having trouble with Kicad 4.0.5 I am using Debian 9.4.
I tried to jump over to the packages from stretch-backports for
productive usage, but just got error two or more packages specified
(kicad stretch-backorts)
Can you help me Please
Isaac Shields
Hi folks,
browsing source packages I would like to have a list of
related *source* packages, next to the related binary
packages.
Working on a backport of (lets say) freeipa I don't need
to know which binary packages I need at install time, but
which other source packages I have to backpo
Dear maintainers, server administrators and web masters,
a couple of weeks ago package sites from experimental suite started to
fail opening with error 500 Internal Server Error. Because this failure
is not temporary anymore but became unfortunately stable, I'd like to
ask you to check the sit
On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:32:45 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi Laura,
Thanks for mentioning this on #-www today!
Hello all,
I'm also experiencing such issue on this page:
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/firefox-esr
Best regards,
Alex.
Hi Olly,
Olly Betts (2018-01-26):
> Yes. The directory on pkgmirror-csail actually had two different
> versions of the database using different database backends, so the
> files which aren't in the directory on picconi are essentially an
> old version of the same database.
>
> That alone should
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 05:32:45PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > mod_fcgid: stderr: Can't call method "get_document" on an undefined value
> > at ../lib/Packages/Search.pm line 264.
> > End of script output before headers: dispatcher.fcgi
>
> Looking
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi Laura,
Thanks for mentioning this on #-www today!
Laura Arjona Reina (2018-01-24):
> I can reproduce the problem with some other packages (I tried several from the
> list https://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/newpkg and got the error in the
> links to b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #884229 [www.debian.org] 500 error/Internal Server Error
Added tag(s) patch.
--
884229: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884229
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hello
I can reproduce the problem with some other packages (I tried several from the
list https://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/newpkg and got the error in the
links to buster and sid).
I also tried
https://packages.debian.org/stretch-backports/kernel-image-4.14.0-0.bpo.2-arm64-di
with the
at says "two or more packages specified (zbar
squeeze)". We cannot find a way around this error, and we are looking
for help. Please get back to me as soon as possible.
You probably want this package:
python-zbar
You can install it with your package manager, or doing this from the
command
correct download or installation instructions. We believe that the one we
need is on http://zbar.sourceforge.net/download.html under the section
Linux Binaries- Debian 6.0 "Squeeze" (testing). When we click on this link
an "Error" message comes up that says "two or more
severity -1 important
On the packages.d.o binary packages pages, a "list of files" link is offered
for every supported
architecture. For (at least many) packages that have been introduced in the
last two years, that link points to a page that says "No such package in this
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Go to https://packages.debian.org/index and enter
/etc/bluetooth/main.conf under "Search the contents of packages".
Ensure default "packages that contain files named like this" is
selected, distribution stretch, architecture any, an
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Yanhao Mo wrote:
> I've be wondering where is the `action needed` list come from on
> packages' tracker.debian.org pages. Because I'd like to help with that
> if I may.
Your help with tracker.d.o would be very very welcome.
You will need
Hi, folks.
I've be wondering where is the `action needed` list come from on
packages' tracker.debian.org pages. Because I'd like to help with that
if I may.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Daniel Urist wrote:
> The changelog link for at least some packages marked as security seems to be
> broken.
There is already a bug about this issue, since it is over 9 years old
and generates duplicate bug reports and user complaints in various
places
The changelog link for at least some packages marked as security seems to
be broken. For example, the changelog for apache2 on this page:
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/apache2
which links to this:
http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs//main/a/apache2/apache2_2.4.25-3
On Sun, 21 May 2017 14:48:32 -0500,
Richard Owlett wrote:
>I was looking for man page for "apt-get"
>
>I went to https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
>Entered "apt-get" in search box.
>On multiple tries I was sent to
>https://packages.debian.org/search?
I was looking for man page for "apt-get"
I went to https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
Entered "apt-get" in search box.
On multiple tries I was sent to
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=stable§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=apt-get
The resu
1 - 100 of 868 matches
Mail list logo
