On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 06:53:34PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 24 August 2004 18:34, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > The wording sounds unclear to me in some of the notes, and some
> > issues are missing, as well
>
> Could you please elabo
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 06:21:49PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 25 August 2004 01:46, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:57:57PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> > > Thanks for your detailed analysis on the matter. M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 01:46, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:57:57PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> > Thanks for your detailed analysis on the matter. Maybe I was a bit
> > unclear in my previous message. What I meant was that t
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:57:57PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> Thanks for your detailed analysis on the matter. Maybe I was a bit unclear
> in my previous message. What I meant was that the patch should fix newly
> generated files.
This is not possible, old pages may get rebuild for many reas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 22:19, Denis Barbier wrote:
> This is not enough:
> 1. DOCTYPE has to be changed and all files rebuild
> 2. many source files have to be modified in order to be processed
> (basically they have to be XHTML compliant)
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:41:07PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 24 August 2004 20:36, Luk Claes wrote:
> > I think it's a good idea to put such a page on the site.
> >
> > But I also think we maybe need updated validate and tidy scri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 20:36, Luk Claes wrote:
> I think it's a good idea to put such a page on the site.
>
> But I also think we maybe need updated validate and tidy scripts? They
> would ease the conversion and maintenance.
Well, I agree in princ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tobias Toedter wrote:
| the long-term goal for the Debian website is to comply to the XHTML
| standard. I thought that maybe it could be a good idea to create a
page on
| which the most common mistakes/pitfalls etc. are listed when writing
XHTML.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 18:34, Mike Hommey wrote:
> The wording sounds unclear to me in some of the notes, and some
> issues are missing, as well
Could you please elaborate on that? What's missing, what's unclear to you?
I'm not a native speaker,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 05:41:34PM +0200, Tobias Toedter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> the long-term goal for the Debian website is to comply to the XHTML
> standard. I thought that maybe it could be a good idea to create a page on
> which the most common
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the long-term goal for the Debian website is to comply to the XHTML
standard. I thought that maybe it could be a good idea to create a page on
which the most common mistakes/pitfalls etc. are listed when writing XHTML.
This document is intended
11 matches
Mail list logo
