Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Offering a patch doesn't always make a difference to the web team, > apparently - #325698 is open for 1y207d without one single comment. I think that may have been because: 1. the patch is inline in the message body, yet inside a PGP/MIME mail text

Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 26 March 2007 16.24:25 MJ Ray wrote: > > [...] too much news-style ick in the user > > list. That would make it have less impact, as readers will notice and > > may discount it as marketing more than reports. > > Hmm. This begs the question

Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

On Monday 26 March 2007 16.24:25 MJ Ray wrote: > [...] too much news-style ick in the user > list. That would make it have less impact, as readers will notice and > may discount it as marketing more than reports. Hmm. This begs the question of the purpose of this users list. * we want to show th

Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

Kaare Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So it would be okay with you, if someone from us adds something to the > > user page? > > I guess "us" means debian-publicity? For my part I have no problem with this > (make sure that the organizations are

Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:00:15 +0200 Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Next time please make sure someone on debian-www is ready to add the > > submission when you expect it to be added; this could easily have been > > worked out. > > So it would be okay with you, if someone from us

Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

Hi! * Kaare Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070325 20:47]: > Next time please make sure someone on debian-www is ready to add the > submission when you expect it to be added; this could easily have been > worked out. So it would be okay with you, if someone from us adds something to the user page?

Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

[please keep cc:ing me, I'm not subscribed to d-www] On Sunday 25 March 2007 20:47, you wrote: [debian users list entries.] > Please be aware that debian-www doesn't write the entries, as I now > realize you were expecting in the original mail.  The guidelines are at > the bottom of the page. As

Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

Yo, I guess I owe you an apology, and thanks for taking care of it now. On Saturday 24 March 2007 13:19, MJ Ray wrote: > 1. You're asking people to do work; Yep. I did some work, too, and I don't have permission to do the rest of it. > 2. I'm damned busy and I only got commit access to work o

Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:20:04 +0100 Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a bit disappointed at this point. I followed up on the recent > informationweek article to get permission to list Linden Lab as a Debian > user on our users page, sent mail to debian-www a few weeks ago only t

Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Such stuff happening is also making Debian look bad: [...] > [...] > Could somebody with commit access and WML skillz please do that small update > to the web? 1. You're asking people to do w

Commit policy [Was: Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian]

Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm a bit disappointed at this point. I followed up on the recent > informationweek article to get permission to list Linden Lab as a > Debian user on our users page, sent mail to debian-www a few weeks > ago only to have that email com

Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian

Hi all, I'm a bit disappointed at this point. I followed up on the recent informationweek article to get permission to list Linden Lab as a Debian user on our users page, sent mail to debian-www a few weeks ago only to have that email completely ignored. Such stuff happening is also making D