Re: Bullseye becoming LTS next Thursday

mes quite late! Bullseye will switch to LTS next week, and I > > would like to be sure the infrastructure is ready for it. Is there > > anything required so we (LTS Team) can upload to bullseye-security > > since next Thursday (August 15th)? > > > > Webmaster T

Re: Bullseye becoming LTS next Thursday

Hello all. Le vendredi 09 août 2024 à 15:01 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit : > Dear Teams, > > I just realised I had to send this email a long while ago. Really > sorry > if this comes quite late! Bullseye will switch to LTS next week, and I > would like to be sure the

Re: Bullseye becoming LTS next Thursday

Hello all El 9 de agosto de 2024 20:01:35 CEST, "Santiago Ruano Rincón" escribió: >Dear Teams, > >I just realised I had to send this email a long while ago. Really sorry >if this comes quite late! Bullseye will switch to LTS next week, and I >would like to be sure th

Bullseye becoming LTS next Thursday

Dear Teams, I just realised I had to send this email a long while ago. Really sorry if this comes quite late! Bullseye will switch to LTS next week, and I would like to be sure the infrastructure is ready for it. Is there anything required so we (LTS Team) can upload to bullseye-security since

Re: new redirects for www.d.o/security and www.d.o/lts/security

Hi Thomas, On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:06:58AM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: > Hi all, > > we now redirect all DSA/DLA URLs under security and lts/security with > or without having the year in the path and with or without a version > to their announcement mail: > Examples: &g

new redirects for www.d.o/security and www.d.o/lts/security

Hi all, we now redirect all DSA/DLA URLs under security and lts/security with or without having the year in the path and with or without a version to their announcement mail: Examples: /security/dsa-5576 /security/2023/dsa-5576-2 lts/security/2023/dla-3686-1 lts/security/dla-3686 All URLs like

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

ies. Here are some numbers - 1700 x security update, 6 other categories for the DSAs - 2504 x LTS security update and 12 others for the DLAs In the end we would have a localized date, but the interesting information of the advisory itself would still be in english. It's not worth spending ti

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

the common categories like "security update". Regards, Hans man. 25. des. 2023 kl. 22:33 skrev Thomas Lange : > Hi all, > > as announced on Dec 7th, I have now removed the old index.wml files > and renamed new.wml to index.wml in the webwml repository un

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

Hi Thomas, On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:14:51PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: > Hi all, > > as announced on Dec 7th, I have now removed the old index.wml files > and renamed new.wml to index.wml in the webwml repository under > security/ a

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

l. ah, very nice! & thanks for clarifying too! https://lts-team.pages.debian.net/wiki/Development.html updated :) Cheers! Sylvain Beucler Debian LTS Team

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 10:56:56PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: > > what do we need to do instead? :) > Nothing in the webwml repository. > The list of recent advisories on the web pages is now automatically > generated from the data from the security tracker. > It's important that the announceme

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

>>>>> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 21:24:19 +, Holger Levsen >>>>> said: > On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:14:51PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: >> Now the security team and the LTS team do not need to manually prepare >> a .wml and .data file for eac

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:14:51PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: > Now the security team and the LTS team do not need to manually prepare > a .wml and .data file for each advisory. > Please stop creating those files for new advisories. what do we need to do instead? :) -- cheers,

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

Hi all, as announced on Dec 7th, I have now removed the old index.wml files and renamed new.wml to index.wml in the webwml repository under security/ and lts/security/. = IMPORTANT = Now the security team and

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

>>>>> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 10:27:24 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez >>>>> said: > At what point should the LTS team stop generating these? Is that > something that we should discontinue right away, or do wait for a formal > announcement to let

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

Hi Thomas, [I changed lts-secur...@debian.org to debian-...@lists.debian.org since lts-secur...@debian.org is meant only to reach members of the team approved to deal with embargoed issues. It is not a public list like debian-...@lists.debian.org.] I read through this message and I am very

upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

. The changes will affect the webwml repository under /security/ and /lts/security/. What's already done - The new lists of DSA/DLA are currently available under https://www.debian.org/security/new.html#DSAS https://www.debian.org/lts/security/new.html#DLAS The two new.html pages

Re: LTS

On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 1:47 PM The7up wrote: > This is standing in LTS index page: Please discuss this with the LTS team on their list: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Contact#debian-lts -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

LTS

Hi All! This is standing in LTS index page: "Thus the Debian LTS team takes over security maintenance of the various releases once the Debian Security team stops its work." I think it should be deceptive/unclear some of readers,so we should change it to: Thus the Debian LTS team

Bug#973544: marked as done (www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations)

Your message dated Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:21:02 +0100 with message-id <0ad1b906-3f85-d914-7de2-a65d80561...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#973544: www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations has caused the Debian Bug report #973544, regarding www.debian.or

Bug#973544: www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations

Hi Laura, Here's a pull request for your consideration: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/merge_requests/566 I didn't switch to get_recent_security_list_rdf() because 'dsa.rdf.in' (non-LTS/DSA) doesn't use it either. Instead I handled the LTS

Bug#973544: www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations

find the correct way to call the function get_recent_security_list_rdf so it creates the RSS feed. CC'ing the debian-lts mailing list for the case they can have a look. Kind regards, El 1/11/20 a las 16:40, Nobuhiro Ban escribió: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal >

Bug#973544: www.debian.org: LTS Security Advisories RSS links to wrong locations

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Debian LTS Security Advisories RSS (https://www.debian.org/lts/security/dla) links to wrong locations. For example: > https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dla-2425"; /> It should be https://www.debian.org/lts/security/20

Bug#922246: marked as done (www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:27:00 + with message-id <20191212162700.7pkc6jsxhwjf5...@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes has caused the Debian Bug report #922246, regarding www/l

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

Holger Levsen writes: > awesome, merged, thank you! Do you think we can close this bug now? Fine with me... -- Brian May

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

Hi Brian, On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 05:09:42PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Brian May writes: > > Is it OK if we simply delete this line? > Done by https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/298 awesome, merged, thank you! Do you think we can close this bug now? -- cheers,

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

Brian May writes: > Is it OK if we simply delete this line? Done by https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/298 -- Brian May

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

Brian May writes: > When I just tested it I found that the index contains entries for both > files, however the DSA--2 entry is incorrectly titled as DSA- instead > of DSA--2. Actually it looks like this was deliberate. The file template/debian/recent_list_security.wml has the funct

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > * The /lts/security//index.*.html files show the last advisory for > the cases where there are several files with the same beginning (e.g. > for DSA- and DSA--2, both html files are generated, but the >

Bug#925266: marked as done (two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 8.11.0 for the rest))

Your message dated Fri, 09 Aug 2019 15:50:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#925266: fixed in odb-api 0.18.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #925266, regarding two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 8.11.0 for the rest) to be marked as done. This means

Bug#925266: two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 8.11.0 for the rest)

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:14:04AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 00:28 +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: >> Package: www.debian.org >> User: www.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertag: content lts >> Severity: normal >> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-.

Bug#925266: two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 8.11.0 for the rest)

On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 00:28 +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > User: www.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertag: content lts > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org > > Hi all > Install media version 8.11.1 has bee

Bug#925266: two different versions for Jessie install media (8.11.1 for LTS, 8.11.0 for the rest)

Package: www.debian.org User: www.debian@packages.debian.org Usertag: content lts Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org Hi all Install media version 8.11.1 has been created for Jessie LTS architectures only, so we need to keep on offering 8.11.0 images for the non-LTS

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

package: www.debian.org x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Hi, this is a bug to track fixing this small glitch in the new /lts/security/ area: On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

El 10/11/18 a las 22:55, Laura Arjona Reina escribió: > > For the website, I have created the merge request with a proposal: > > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/40 > > (I'm attaching the diff too). > Sorry, I forgot the attachment. Kind regards -- Laura Arjona

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

Hi, thanks for your work on documenting how to install jessie these days! On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:23:45PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I assume this is going to appear at > . That seems > a fairly prominent place, though the errata ar

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

; installed. However, this didn't include updates that depend on a new > > binary package, due to a kernel or library ABI change. > > > > I fixed this bug in unstable and in a stable update that will be > > included in Debian 9.6. However, since there are no stable

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

package, due to a kernel or library ABI change. > > I fixed this bug in unstable and in a stable update that will be > included in Debian 9.6. However, since there are no stable updates > during the LTS period, this bug will remain unfixed in the installer > for jessie. > >

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 01:50:48AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I have updated the wiki LTS/Installing page and added post-installation > steps to install the missed upgrades. However, I wonder whether it > would be helpful and possible to update the release notes or other &

Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

nd in a stable update that will be included in Debian 9.6. However, since there are no stable updates during the LTS period, this bug will remain unfixed in the installer for jessie. I have updated the wiki LTS/Installing page and added post-installation steps to install the missed upgrades. Ho

Bug#822956: marked as done (www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS)

Your message dated Fri, 03 Jun 2016 19:16:50 + with message-id and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by holger-guest fixes #822956 has caused the Debian Bug report #822956, regarding www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Re: Bug#822956: www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS

Hi, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > Now that Wheezy has been handed over to the LTS team, a note could be > added in the release pages. Patch attached. Also attached a Spanish > translation to b

Bug#822956: www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS

incón : > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > Now that Wheezy has been handed over to the LTS team, a note could be > added in the release pages. Patch attached. Also attached a Spanish > translation to be forwarded to l10n-spanish. > > Cheers, > > Santiago >

Bug#822956: www.debian.org: releases/wheezy note on LTS

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Now that Wheezy has been handed over to the LTS team, a note could be added in the release pages. Patch attached. Also attached a Spanish translation to be forwarded to l10n-spanish. Cheers, Santiago >F

Re: No mention of LTS to the Debian Squeeze page

rds, I think it is a good idea! If nobody objects, I will apply the attached patch in a few days. Thomas > > Damien / vauss > > > On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:42:11 +0100 > va...@free.fr wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The Debian Squeeze page (https://www.debian.org/rele

Re: No mention of LTS to the Debian Squeeze page

> The Debian Squeeze page (https://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze) does > not mention the Long Term Support (LTS). It would be interesting to add > a such reference. > Text suggestion: "Squeeze benefits from Long Term Support (LTS) until > February 2016. The LTS is limited t

No mention of LTS to the Debian Squeeze page

Hi, The Debian Squeeze page (https://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze) does not mention the Long Term Support (LTS). It would be interesting to add a such reference. Text suggestion: "Squeeze benefits from Long Term Support (LTS) until February 2016. The LTS is limited to i386 and amd64. For

Bug#762254: marked as done ("explain LTS on the www.d.o website")

Your message dated Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:39:11 +0200 with message-id <5577791f.6070...@larjona.net> and subject line /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS has caused the Debian Bug report #751403, regarding "explain LTS on the www.d.o website" to be marked as done.

Bug#751403: marked as done (www.debian.org: /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:39:11 +0200 with message-id <5577791f.6070...@larjona.net> and subject line /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS has caused the Debian Bug report #751403, regarding www.debian.org: /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze

Bug#750764: marked as done (packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:46:13 -0800 with message-id <20150131234613.GA3302@kiwi> and subject line Re: packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite has caused the Debian Bug report #750764, regarding packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite to be marked a

Bug#751403: Public image of LTS (was: squeeze-lts and the security tracker)

> > > > First, I need a definite list of source.list entries, that is, a real > > > answer to the "what to leave in sources.list?" thread. :-) > > > > > > Depending on that answer, there might be different ways for presenting > > > sque

Bug#751403: www.debian.org: /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS

Thank you. On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Noël Köthe wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Hello, > > I was looking for how to use squeeze LTS. > The mainpage www.debian.org and a websearch for "debian squeeze lts" > gives me > > h

Bug#751403: www.debian.org: /News/2014/20140424 missing link how to use squeeze LTS

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hello, I was looking for how to use squeeze LTS. The mainpage www.debian.org and a websearch for "debian squeeze lts" gives me https://www.debian.org/News/2014/20140424 but there is no more info how to use it and the link to www.debian.org i

Bug#750764: packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite

On Friday 06 June 2014 08:55:13 Ryan Tandy wrote: [...] > AIUI the suite focuses on security fixes, so perhaps adding the > [security] tag to its packages, as for $codename-security, would be > appropriate? That's actually used to indicate the origin of the package, so in this case

Bug#750764: packages.debian.org: please include squeeze-lts suite

ueeze-lts suite on packages.debian.org? AIUI the suite focuses on security fixes, so perhaps adding the [security] tag to its packages, as for $codename-security, would be appropriate? thanks, Ryan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: squeeze-lts section

Hi, Or on the download / main page :D Regards > On 30 mai 2014, at 18:38, matteo filippetto > wrote: > > > Hi, > > there is a request from the squeeze-lts team: is it possible to add a specific > section about squeeze-lts release and how to enable it into > http

squeeze-lts section

Hi, there is a request from the squeeze-lts team: is it possible to add a specific section about squeeze-lts release and how to enable it into https://www.debian.org/security/ ? Regards -- Matteo Filippetto http://www.op83.eu @matteo_1983 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ

packages.debian.org w/o squeeze-lts

Hi In packages.debian.org [1] squeeze-lts isn't mentioned. Could you please add it? At least the package hello should already exist. Greets Jens Korte [1] https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=hello -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em