Hi!
Grant Bowman wrote:
> I have subscribed to this list for a few weeks but haven't seen much
> serious discussion in at least a year on this list. I see 300 people
> are subscribed if http://lists.debian.org/stats/ is accurate.
http://murphy.debian.org/lists/debian-publicity/ is another source
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:06:41PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
>
> I agree, this shouldn't be done haphazardly. I was trying to get a more
> concrete suggestion worked out about the content before moving on
> through the process and bringing it to this list. I think it's great if
> both lists par
* James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011213 11:03]:
> Hmm. the person that wrote the following has no attribution in the mail
> I'm responding to.
Hi James,
That was me. Kyle missed the attribution.
> > > One of the biggest publicity items for Debian is it's website, however
> > > the very im
Hmm. the person that wrote the following has no attribution in the mail
I'm responding to.
> >
> > One of the biggest publicity items for Debian is it's website, however
> > the very important /intro/ section seems less than complete to me. I
> > intend to help out in this area and I wanted to s
4 matches
Mail list logo
