Control: tags -1 +patch
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/16
Control: user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertag 1098454 + bsp-2025-03-ca-montreal
On 2024-04-09 17:25:26, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Sever
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #1068714 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org: Please make links to
deb.debian.org use HTTPS instead of HTTP
Added tag(s) patch.
> forwarded -1
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/16
Bug #1068714 [www.d
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: serious
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Hello,
In packages.debian.org, links pointing to the different source files
useful for a package are pointing to deb.debian.org via HTTP (not HTTPS)
links.
See https://packages.debian.org/bookworm
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:47:22 +0200
with message-id <25908.32554.742541.369...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #596558,
regarding automate processing of http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2023 14:55:22 +
with message-id <651c2b5acea78_25e19d96054...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#222334 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #222334,
regarding http://www.debian.org/intro/cn.en.html could be targetted
to be marked a
I've been faced with same issue (workarounded with own user script), would
it be fixed in the future?
Thanks,
Kisaragi
Hi,
Investigating on this point, could this be related to those lines here:
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/blob/master/config.sh.sed.in#L27
?
Thanks,
Patrice
(in
'Links for' menu) are explicitly based on the HTTP protocol.
Could it be possible to use a relative URL schema or switch to https:
to avoid warnings in some cases?
Thanks,
Patrice
Hello
There are still some links that would have to be converted from http to
https in the packages part of debian.org.
example:
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/h/horst/horst_5.1-2.dsc
">[horst_5.1-2.dsc]
(source: https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/horst )
Thank you
JP
Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 2021 22:48:18 +0200
with message-id <24931.20882.565266.102...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #600902,
regarding add RSS to http://www.debian.org/users/
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
ems with apt updates & HTTP access "Error 503 Service
> Unavailable"
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:35:39 +0200
> From: Mouslim J
> To: ow...@bugs.debian.org
>
>
>Hi there!
>
>I have a problem to update my source lists and also to install packa
Forwarded Message
Subject: Problems with apt updates & HTTP access "Error 503 Service
Unavailable"
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:35:39 +0200
From: Mouslim J
To: ow...@bugs.debian.org
Hi there!
I have a problem to update my source lists and also to in
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:24 AM Patrice Duroux wrote:
> http://deb.li are currently very slow or doesn't provide any answer to me.
Please try to diagnose that issue and report the results to the admin
https://wiki.debian.org/deb.li
https://deb.li/imprint.html
--
bye,
pab
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:24 AM Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Any opinion on those links?
I think the wiki should use direct links instead of deb.li links
unless there is a reason to do otherwise, please feel free to update
the links.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Hi,
For instance browsing on https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianGnome and following
one of the links in 'Important links' section that are based on http://deb.li
are currently very slow or doesn't provide any answer to me.
What is recommendation for such links?
In both https://
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jul 2019 04:26:02 +0200
with message-id <23855.55482.935993.251...@informatik.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line /devel/people finally removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #727738,
regarding Updates for http://www.debian.org/devel/people page
to be marked as done.
under http://www.debian.org/support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and h
Your message dated Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:33:14 +
with message-id <5cc1d33ae389_71e32b1610ef70d018...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug #270772 in www.debian.org fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #270772,
regarding http://www.debian.org/support - order of entries makes no sense to me
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2019 01:54:59 +0100
with message-id <0ada3fb7-c0dd-ab0d-7089-eb00016a7...@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#832920: redirect HTTP to HTTPS on www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #832920,
regarding redirect HTTP to HTTPS on www.debian.org
to be mar
Your message dated Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:48:15 +
with message-id <5c83fc5f1c2c7_37c2b1f7ecdf0dc67...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug #924091 in www.debian.org fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #924091,
regarding www.debian.org: News/2019/20190308.wml points to www.debian.org using
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainers,
Page News/2019/20190308.wml, as of commit
ce517877a62210aca2c6dcfa4431f2ccb43c22da, points, in the "Contact
Information" section, to www.debian.org using http://. I guess it should
use https:// instead.
Regards,
Rafa.
sig
On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 11:12 PM Ido Goldbaum wrote:
> To: debian-www@lists.debian.org, listmas...@lists.debian.org
I think it would be best to contact this list instead:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-snapshot/
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Hello,
I'm experiencing connectivity issues when I'm trying to access the domain
snapshot.debian.org.
I'm getting the pages successfully sometimes but most of the times the
connection is refused.
Can you please help me with this?
Ido.
Your message dated Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:38:42 +0200
with message-id <20181018133842.ga18...@anguilla.debian.or.at>
and subject line filelist working again
has caused the Debian Bug report #884838,
regarding www.debian.org: http://packages.debian.org/*/*/*/filelist out-of-date
to be marked a
th/certs/ where I get a
> HTTP 500 error.
>
> The contents are as follows:
>
>
> Internal Server Error
> The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was
> unable to complete your request.
>
> Please contact the server administrator at debian
Dear SSO team / server admins,
When I try to sign on to sso.debian.org with my Alioth (-guest) account,
I am redirected to https://sso.debian.org/alioth/certs/ where I get a
HTTP 500 error.
The contents are as follows:
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:08:58PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> > One negative point of above approach is that it always downloads doc deb
> > packages even if there are no changes.
>
> This will prevent downloading the same package twice:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> One negative point of above approach is that it always downloads doc deb
> packages even if there are no changes.
This will prevent downloading the same package twice:
chdist apt old install --download-only emacsen-common
> Also unpacking co
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:26:23AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> > apt-get has -C option to use non-standard /etc/apt/sources.list
> > listing unstable distribution:
>
> This is the wrong way to completely override the system apt
> configur
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> apt-get has -C option to use non-standard /etc/apt/sources.list
> listing unstable distribution:
This is the wrong way to completely override the system apt
configuration. The right way is to set the APT_CONFIG environment
variable. See the ap
ownloading the latest unstable binary packages.
> Why re-invent the binary package downloader when we have "apt-get"?
>
> apt-get has -C option to use non-standard /etc/apt/sources.list
> listing unstable distribution:
>
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ sid main
etfiles are downloading the latest unstable binary packages.
Why re-invent the binary package downloader when we have "apt-get"?
apt-get has -C option to use non-standard /etc/apt/sources.list
listing unstable distribution:
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
We need
Hello
I've been doing some tests and this is what I have, for now:
* the current script is in:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/tree/parts/1ftpfiles
(and it works, not sure when/if it will stop working...).
* There, changing ftp:// for http:// is not enough, because we
n.org servers.
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debwww/cron.git (Maybe moving to salsa
> soon)
> parts/1ftpfiles
> parts/7doc
>
> As the 1ftpfiles indicates, packages are gatherted from ftp package site
> which is now non-sup[ported officially. (Now we are supposed to use
> ht
Hello.
I searched the archives but it doesn't look like anyone reported this
yet. While trying to view the changelog for the latest Debian stretch
kernel
(http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs//main/l/linux/linux_4.9.82-1+deb9u3_changelog)
I received this error from Varnish:
Your message dated Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:39:54 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Bug #808262 [SOLVED] http://planet.debian.org/opml.xml
produces an error because there is a non-escaped char " in one feed title
has caused the Debian Bug report #808262,
regarding www.debian.org:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
we've received a report on pkg-dns-devel that bind9utils on amd64 does
not contain the python3 modules
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-dns-devel/Week-of-Mon-20171218/002260.html
I've verified the build log and the package in
bian
>GPG keyring. However that link is HTTP, pointing to:
>http://keyring.debian.org/
>
>It will immediately redirect to HTTPS, but an attacker could intercept
>that redirection and present a user with a malicious keyring instead.
>
>This makes the verification kinda pointless,
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:24:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by gusnan fixes #873122
has caused the Debian Bug report #873122,
regarding HTTP Link to Keyring
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Note that this will also need to be applied for all the translated
pages as well. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to speed
the process up.
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I'm attaching the original wml file + patches to change http to https.
I wanted to rename them version 1.5 /1.6 etc but didn't want to put an
extra dot. Do let me know what's good practice as this is just my
second patch submitt
gt;
> When downloading a Debian CD there's a webpage explaining how to
verify
> signatures:
> https://www.debian.org/CD/verify
>
> This recommends to check the signatures with the keys from the Debian
> GPG keyring. However that link is HTTP, pointing to:
> http://keyring
Package: www.debian.org
When downloading a Debian CD there's a webpage explaining how to verify
signatures:
https://www.debian.org/CD/verify
This recommends to check the signatures with the keys from the Debian
GPG keyring. However that link is HTTP, pointing to:
http://keyring.debian.org
Hello,
Dixit Laura Arjona Reina, le 15/08/2017 :
>I have removed "debian.org" and "security.debian.org" from that list,
>and checked that CVS now allow commits in the errata.wml page.
>
>So, Baptiste, your problem should be solved, now.
That works, thanks.
Baptiste
pgpddXXwbpTcI.pgp
Descript
Hello
El 15/08/17 a las 19:49, Baptiste Jammet escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I'm curretly unable to update the french translation for
> releases/jessie/errata.wml because it contains some http:// link and
> the server is refusing my commit.
> But the original page contains
Hello,
I'm curretly unable to update the french translation for
releases/jessie/errata.wml because it contains some http:// link and
the server is refusing my commit.
But the original page contains the same non-SSL links.
I know that
>The CVS repository will reject commits containing pl
Well done on getting your website optimized!Your stats are awesome.
Now your biggest challenge is maintaining your PageSpeed scores and loading
speed while developing your website further and adding new features.
We would like to offer you our optimized development services. We will
ensur
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The link to the Debian Archives on
> https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive should not be available via
> https.
Fix committed, there was also another page too:
https://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2015/07/
--
bye,
pabs
https://wik
Hi
[In case needed, please CC me on replies, not subscribed to the list]
The link to the Debian Archives on
https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive should not be available via
https.
Details can be found at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/03/msg00306.html .
archive.debian.org is not av
Hi all
I don't know Django but for what I've read, I think that adding braces
to the variables related to the title in /templates/opml.xml
may escape the quotes, and solve this issue.
I'm attaching a patch for the opml.xml template; please apply it if
you think it's correct; or I can apply some d
Your message dated Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:24:43 +0800
with message-id <1489213483.27304.12.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: www.debian.org: package information missing (to the right)
at http://packages.debian.org/sid/deroff
has caused the Debian Bug report #621490,
reg
Hi guys,
I am getting this issue:
W: Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/jessie/updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
Hash Sum mismatch
>From Singapore (on a couple of hosts). But not from a VPS in the UK.
Starting to think there is some CDN mis-configuration? Please let me
k
Package: www.debian.org
Currently, www.debian.org is served both via HTTP and HTTPS. Since HTTP
must die [1], I propose to redirect *all* HTTP requests to HTTPS.
gentoo.org, archlinux.org, getfedora.org, opensuse.org and redhat.com
already do this.
That should be a relatively
the links to https in
both the original files and the new ones (using smart_change.pl) and
then do the translation updates. I've just ran this set of commands so
you should just be able to do the translation update now (make sure
you keep https for d-i.d.o):
site=d-i.debian.org
./smart_change
Hi,
A commit of an updated Dutch translation (index.nl.html) of
www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/index.html was refused today
because some of the links in it were of the form http://some.web.page
rather than https://that.web.page.
However, when I execute
grep http://
my.local.copy.of/webwml
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2016 02:46:49 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #604716,
regarding packages.debian.org: download page broken for non existing package
(http://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/libprotobuf3/download)
to be marked as done
On 30/03/2016 19:37, Holger Wansing wrote:
on your page http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-lang-priorities
there is a link to our Debian webpage "http://www.debian.org/intro/cn#mozilla";.
We have changed the relevant page, amongst other changes: sort browsers
alphabetically;
Hi Richard,
on your page http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-lang-priorities
there is a link to our Debian webpage "http://www.debian.org/intro/cn#mozilla";.
We have changed the relevant page, amongst other changes: sort browsers
alphabetically; see https://www.debian
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2016 02:19:35 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #573797,
regarding packages.debian.org:
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/i386/unison/filelist shows wrong list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:22:41 +
with message-id <20160124162241.ga10...@shiftout.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#694927: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ does index
listing
has caused the Debian Bug report #694927,
regarding http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ does index l
[Iceweasel] (I get the error in Spanish, translation is mine)
-
http://planet.debian.org/opml.xml
XML Read error: malformed
Location: http://planet.debian.org/opml.xml
Line number 41, column 171:
http://softwarelivre.org/profile/terceiro/tags/english/feed";
ti
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear Planet Maintainers,
Thanks for working in planet.debian.org and its underlying software.
When I try to see the OPML feed, I got an error:
[Iceweasel] (I get the error in Spanish, translation is mine)
-
http://planet.debian.org/opml.xml
XML
Hi Emilio,
I've sent an email to that mirrors administrators. Thank you for the report!
Best regards,
Donald Norwood
-Debian Mirrors
On 11/25/2015 02:55 AM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stéphane Blondon wrote:
>> Hello Emilio,
>>
>> Le 24/11/2015 21:05, Emilio Vargas a écrit :
>>> This link
Hi,
Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> Hello Emilio,
>
> Le 24/11/2015 21:05, Emilio Vargas a écrit :
> > This link is broken.
>
> thank you for signaling a broken link.
> Do you remember on which page(s) you find the link to this address?
Seems to be under mirrors.
Holger
--
=
Hello Emilio,
Le 24/11/2015 21:05, Emilio Vargas a écrit :
> This link is broken.
thank you for signaling a broken link.
Do you remember on which page(s) you find the link to this address?
Cheers,
Stéphane
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This link is broken.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 05:59:20PM -0400, Ryan Rotter wrote:
>http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/firmware/stable still
>points at wheezy rather than jessie. Is this the right place to report this?
Hi Ryan,
This is not technically the right place, but I'm on the m
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/firmware/stable still
points at wheezy rather than jessie. Is this the right place to report this?
2015-06-20 8:56 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise :
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
>
>> writing redirects is a better solution.
>
> I wasn't able to figure out how to do this easily.
Did you try with configuration of the webserver (like RedirectMatch
for Apache2) or another level?
C
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> writing redirects is a better solution.
I wasn't able to figure out how to do this easily.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
2015-06-18 15:51 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise :
> The problem appears to be more widespread than that, even within
> Debian there are a number of packages linking to the old URL scheme.
> I'm looking into just adding a redirect to fix this issue completely.
>
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=package
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> Perhaps we should contact the maintainer of the documentation in order
> to push him to update it?
> I'm not sure it will work because the last update was in 2005.
>
> I plan to do it this week-end except if someone has a better idea.
The
2015-06-18 11:33 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise :
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:58 PM, wert wrote:
>
>> 4.1. Install Jigdo
>> .testing, download jigdo-file from unstable at
>> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/jigdo-file.html
> [...]
> Try this link instead:
&
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:58 PM, wert wrote:
> 4.1. Install Jigdo
> .testing, download jigdo-file from unstable at
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/jigdo-file.html
>
> Result:
> Error
>
> No such package.
Try this link instead:
https://packages.debian
4.1. Install Jigdo
.testing, download jigdo-file from unstable at
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/jigdo-file.html
Result:
Error
No such package.
--
http://www.pc-fluesterer.info/wordpress/
https://geti2p.net/de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Don't know how to proceed :-(
>
> I will revert the first changing on the Lenny installmanual, since that
> has absolutely no benefit.
I have also reverted the change against the Etch installmanual file,
since seems to be no more progress.
Holger
--
==
glish pages are broken. Is there something still
> ongoing, or should the test changes be reverted?
Yes, this work in progress.
Time for a status report :-)
I made two different attempts to correct the error:
On the install manual for Lenny I swapped two arguments when calling the
&qu
Holger Wansing writes:
> Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
>>
>> > What to do about this?
>> > Simply give it a try?
>>
>> Maybe try it on one of the old, unsupported releases, like lenny?
>
> Yeah, that's a great idea!
Hi,
what is the status of this? I
On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 21:39 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Since http://d-i.alioth.debian.org also supports https, I think it is
> fine changing that occurrences from http to https.
Indeed, please do.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: Thi
home/ted/.ssh/id_alioth':
> ? .directory
> Commit contains these http: URLs, please change them to https:
> so that users visiting them are protected by SSL.
>
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org
> cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
>
rying that, I was hit by this:
ted@IBM-T60:~/deb/website/webwml/english/releases/lenny$ cvs ci
cvs commit: Examining .
cvs commit: Examining debian-installer
Enter passphrase for key '/home/ted/.ssh/id_alioth':
? .directory
Commit contains these
Your message dated Sun, 22 Feb 2015 14:52:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by geissert fixes #777192
has caused the Debian Bug report #777192,
regarding mirrors: Argonne public software mirror service has removed public
access via HTTP, FTP, and rsync
to be marked
Hello,
Do you mind to add www.unix.com as a free resource for unix and linux
technical support on your excellent page:
*http://www.debian.org/support.html <http://www.debian.org/support.html>*
Also, unix.com also has a unique and powerful recursive man page search
feature for uni
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> I just ran into this:
> If you search something using the form on top in https://www.debian.org/
> or other sites on www.debian.org the search query will be sent
> unencrypted over plain HTTP.
This is a known issue t
Hi
I just ran into this:
If you search something using the form on top in https://www.debian.org/
or other sites on www.debian.org the search query will be sent
unencrypted over plain HTTP. The reason is that the HTML form element
has this property:
action="http://search.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> shouldn't that be https instead nowadays?
Yes. I've attached a patch for debwww/cron.git that prevents people
from committing pages containing new http: links for sites that should
use https: and prevents people from com
hers.
>
> About Debian
> The Debian Project is an association of Free Software developers who
> volunteer their time and effort in order to produce a completely free
> operating system known as Debian.
>
> Contact Information
> For further information, please visit the Debia
Hi,
Daniel Orth wrote:
> Hallo Herr Wansing,
>
> danke für Ihre Antwort. Hier meine Antworten:
>
> Ja, die Sache ist noch aktuell für uns.
>
> Händlername: TONERDUMPING
>
> URL des Händlers:
> http://www.toner-dumping.de - eine Verlinkung direkt zu den DVDs,
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:49:30 +0200
with message-id <20140721194930.gb23...@anguilla.noreply.org>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #755529,
regarding www.debian.org: http://people.debian.org does not work
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Attempt to load http://people.debian.org waits indefiniely.
Note that I am in Israel.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable&#
Hi all,
The Debian website is now SSL enabled but does not redirect from http to
https. Enabling the redirects is blocked on DSA having an ack from the
web team. DSA have configured the web servers hosting www.d.o so that
even clients without SNI will not experience any problems.
https
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Koen De Maeyer wrote:
> One of the sarges should be etch (the link itself is correct)
Thanks, fixed in CVS, will be online soon.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
* lenny<http://www.debian.org/releases/lenny/> is Debian 5.0
* sarge<http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/> is Debian 4.0
* sarge<http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/> is Debian 3.1
One of the sarges should be etch (the link itself is correct)
K
g and we can
provide that.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/caktje6egq4jeuvxksm+q6vy5f1pvvyc-mh51tvwavsku6vw...@mail.gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Steve,
Thanks. Is the whole /24 unbanned or just /32? Since when were it banned? How
many IPs, which?
I'm going to inform my hosting company about that, as they own the /26 and it
might be in their interest to know about any bans on their IPs.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:32:40PM +0200, Christian Inci wrote:
>
>Please could you tell me why the IP-Address of my VPS (96.47.239.181) is
>blocked?
>All I get is "403 Forbidden".
Hi Chris,
Apologies, you were blocked along with the rest of that /24 due to
spammy activity from nearby hosts. I'v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
Please could you tell me why the IP-Address of my VPS (96.47.239.181) is
blocked?
All I get is "403 Forbidden".
Many thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJ
Hi all,
I asked DSA if the Debian website should redirect HTTP to HTTPS like the
wiki and other sites do. They were positive about this but wanted to
poll the website team about this. Any objections to the redirect?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
vor mehr als einen Monat, habe ich hier
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/adding-form
ein Formular ausgefüllt. Leider ist bisher noch kein Eintrag erstellt
worden.
Ich habe einige DVDs gebrannt und diese auch in unserem Onlineshop gelistet.
Ich finde
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 18:21:24 Jeroen N. Witmond [Bahco] wrote:
> "Alioth" links to http://alioth.debian.org/ which results in "Connecting
> to alioth.debian.org (alioth.debian.org)|217.196.43.134|:80... failed:
> Connection refused."
The Alioth service i
1 - 100 of 1982 matches
Mail list logo
