Bug#925300: marked as done (Debian home page: Cleaning up the "Getting Started" paragraph)

2020-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:34:51 +0100 with message-id <24539.27787.706715.124...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing bugs because of new homepage has caused the Debian Bug report #925300, regarding Debian home page: Cleaning up the "Getting Started" paragraph

Re: Bug#925300: Debian home page: Cleaning up the "Getting Started" paragraph

2019-03-24 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
That's in this context, looking for development/package management > documentation, that I've come across https://www.debian.org/ and thought: > > * Wow, that's a confusing page: There's a "Getting Started" paragraph, > but there's nothing about getting

Debian home page: Cleaning up the "Getting Started" paragraph

2019-03-22 Thread cyrille
bout Debian's package management system, I'm again facing the same difficulties to get clear information. That's in this context, looking for development/package management documentation, that I've come across https://www.debian.org/ and thought: * Wow, that's a confu

Bug#222519: marked as done (www.debian.org: Getting Started on the Homepage still says: "The latest stable release of Debian is 3.0r1")

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, on the Homepage the Getting Started section still says: "The latest stable release of Debian is 3.0r1" although just underneah the News sections says

Bug#222258: marked as done (www.debian.org: getting started outdated)

2004-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
03_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal 'Getting Started' on the main

"getting started" oversight?

2003-12-12 Thread David Clymer
On the front page of www.debian.org ("getting started" section) it states that the latest stable release is 3.0r1, yet in the "news" section there is an announcement of 3.0r2. Is r2 not considered a stable release? If it is, then the "getting started" section should

Bug#222258: www.debian.org: getting started outdated

2003-11-26 Thread Tobias Stefan Richter
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal 'Getting Started' on the main page still lists woody 3.0r1 as latest stable release, whilst News has r2 in already. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux grohl 2.4.22-ac4 #2 Wed Nov 12 17:22:0

Re: Getting started

2003-04-20 Thread Andrew Shugg
Braxton Neate said: > Hello Everyone, > Thought I should introduce myself to this list. > > I have been using Debian for quite some time now and it is my preferred OS. > I do quite a bit of web maintenance work for various organizations and was > thinking the best way for me to give back to such a

Getting started

2003-04-20 Thread Braxton Neate
Hello Everyone, Thought I should introduce myself to this list. I have been using Debian for quite some time now and it is my preferred OS. I do quite a bit of web maintenance work for various organizations and was thinking the best way for me to give back to such a great project would be to help