Re: Debian WWW people page

2002-01-06 Thread Chris Tillman
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:21:48AM +0530, Muthukrishnan, Ramakrishnan wrote: > "James A. Treacy" wrote: > > > > This is something that would be so easy if Debian forced developers to > > use their name and address consistently. > > Yes, I guess this is the correct way to go. I will re-write my de

Re: Debian WWW people page

2002-01-06 Thread Muthukrishnan, Ramakrishnan
"James A. Treacy" wrote: > > This is something that would be so easy if Debian forced developers to > use their name and address consistently. Yes, I guess this is the correct way to go. I will re-write my debian/* files to reflect the name as it appears in my db.d.o records. I did some packages

Re: Debian WWW people page

2002-01-06 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 12:15:25PM +0530, Muthukrishnan, Ramakrishnan wrote: > > I have a suggestion. Why not this be done on the basis of the email id. > For example, if in the above case, the listing was done based on email, > then, all my packages would have been listed in one place. > Take a

Re: Debian WWW people page

2002-01-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 12:15:25PM +0530, Muthukrishnan, Ramakrishnan wrote: > I noticed that my name is listed as Muthukrishnan, Ramakrishnan and none > of my packages are listed in the page[1]. Instead it is listed under > M,Ramakrishnan (which is the name I gave in the debian/control file. > >

Debian WWW people page

2002-01-05 Thread Muthukrishnan, Ramakrishnan
Hi, I am Ramakrishnan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I noticed that my name is listed as Muthukrishnan, Ramakrishnan and none of my packages are listed in the page[1]. Instead it is listed under M,Ramakrishnan (which is the name I gave in the debian/control file. I have a suggestion. Why not this be d