Hi:
The problem is not with the English in particular, but with the
human
language in general, every expression can have different meanings,
depending on who is the one who said it and who is the one who hear it
or read it. Any language is tricky, not just English.
Bye.
AN.
On Wed, 200
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 23:30]:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:16:42AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >> -views the FDL as DFSG-free if invariant sections are not used.
> >> +views the FDL as DFSG-free even if invariant sections are not used.
> >>
> >>
* Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 23:30]:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:16:42AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> -views the FDL as DFSG-free if invariant sections are not used.
>> +views the FDL as DFSG-free even if invariant sections are not used.
>>
>> That even doesn't give any sense
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:16:42AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 03:04]:
> > Log message:
> > Corrections by Yann Dirson and Branden Robinson
>
> -views the FDL as DFSG-free if invariant sections are not used.
> +views the FDL as DFSG-free even
* Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-16 03:04]:
> Log message:
> Corrections by Yann Dirson and Branden Robinson
-views the FDL as DFSG-free if invariant sections are not used.
+views the FDL as DFSG-free even if invariant sections are not used.
That even doesn't give any sense to
5 matches
Mail list logo
