Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:20:10 +
with message-id <5c97d86a33086_2c842ada831e10d059...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug #898258 in www.debian.org fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #898258,
regarding www: please document the exact red color for the debian logo
to be mar
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
https://www.debian.org/logos/ describes how the Debian logo looks like,
but unfortuantly it doesnt include a Pantone or HKS color value for
proper printing.
However, as documented on https://wiki.debian.org/DebianLogo
the red used in
Hi! I've find out that some site uses your logo. Here is a link —
http://ovamo.ru/
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:26:42PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> While I think this is a technically sound proposal how to do hotlinking, I'm
> not sure I want to do that for the services I maintain, as a matter of
> principle. Hotlinking to a different site is bad, as this leaks visitor
> infor
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> While I think this is a technically sound proposal how to do hotlinking, I'm
> not sure I want to do that for the services I maintain, as a matter of
> principle. Hotlinking to a different site is bad, as this leaks visitor
> information to a
Hi,
first of all: dear publicity team, thanks for handling this so very well. Even
though these are very sad circumstances, I was proud and happy being part of
Debian when I read Laura's mail here yesterday. Same goes for Ian's memorial
event at FOSDEM. Thank you.
On Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016,
Your message dated Thu, 28 May 2015 20:49:28 +0200
with message-id <55676338.1020...@larjona.net>
and subject line officiallogo.svg can't be opened in inkscape
has caused the Debian Bug report #721384,
regarding www.debian.org: Debian Logo svg is unable to be opened in inkscape
to b
Your message dated Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:45:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by larjona-guest fixes #689756
has caused the Debian Bug report #689756,
regarding Logos page refers to "The Debian logo"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Hi Jimmy
El 29/06/14 23:18, Andreas "Jimmy" Gredler escribió:
Hi,
I downloaded the svg logo from https://www.debian.org/logos/
(https://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo-nd.svg) and inkscape could not
open it:
jimmy@smoke ~/flag % inkscape openlogo-nd.svg
/home/jimmy/flag/openlogo-nd.svg:18: names
Hi,
I downloaded the svg logo from https://www.debian.org/logos/
(https://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo-nd.svg) and inkscape could not
open it:
jimmy@smoke ~/flag % inkscape openlogo-nd.svg
/home/jimmy/flag/openlogo-nd.svg:18: namespace warning : xmlns: URI
&ns_svg; is not absolute
xmlns
@@
-About the Debian logo
+About the Debian logos
-The Debian logo was selected by a vote by the Debian developers in 1999.
-It was created by Raul Silva. You
-can find more details about the logo on the
+The Debian logos were selected by a vote by the Debian developers in 1999.
+They
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I downloaded the debain svg logo from www.debian.org/logos in the hopes of
printing it using a viny; cutter
When I tried to open it in inkscape I got the following error:
(inkscape:7093): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_widget_get_visible: assert
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:26:01AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Thanks for the bug report!
>
> With my desktop-base hat on, in so far as it's mine:
>
> The inkspat shows that we're creative, able to think outside the box,
> and have an artistic touch when we need to.
>
> I don't thin
Hi, Victor,
Thanks for the bug report!
With my desktop-base hat on, in so far as it's mine:
The inkspat shows that we're creative, able to think outside the box,
and have an artistic touch when we need to.
I don't think it's "dirty". Our default has no splats, yes, but we ship
with splats,
: www.debian.org: The new Debian logo creates dirty
impression
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The logo at the top of http://www.debian.org/ is similar to a blotch and
creates a dirty impression. This is bad from psychological point of view.
I
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The logo at the top of http://www.debian.org/ is similar to a blotch and
creates a dirty impression. This is bad from psychological point of view.
I recommend to change the logo.
*** Please consider answering these questions, where approp
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli (2013-01-24 19:31:53)
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:44:13PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> > For what it's worth, there is still some adobe-specific metadata
> > cruft that can be removed with no harm apparently:
> >
> >
> >
> > http://ns.adobe.com
Your message dated Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:56:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by taffit fixes #698872
has caused the Debian Bug report #698872,
regarding Debian logo svg file is not loadable in Inkscape
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: www.debian.org
[ reporting this as a bug ]
Heya,
Filippo Rusconi discovered the .svg of the Debian logo is not loadable
in (some versions of) Inkscape. With the help of Jakub Wilk, the .svg
has been fixed and it's attached to this mail. Can you please update the
published ve
s fine in Inkscape,
The Gimp, Iceweasel and... GNU Emacs!
Maybe the folks at debian-www@lists.debian.org might want to give it a
test and replace the old file with this one? Anyhow I now have my
Debian logo for my slides!
Thanks all for helping with this issue.
Cheers,
Filippo
--
Filippo Rus
#open-use> falls under an
open use type license.
However, it later contains:
About the Debian logo
The Debian logo was selected by a vote by the Debian developers in
1999. It was created by Raul Silva <mailto:rsi...@debian.org>. You can
find more details about the logo on th
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The actual relicensing shall be done by SPI (as copyright owner) and has
> not happened yet. But it should happen during the next SPI board
> meeting, scheduled for September 13th, 2012.
The above has now happened. SPI resolutio
ow
> > likelihood of Debian changing its logo, this change would have close
> > to no negative effect anyhow: people who really want to have an Expat
> > version of our logo will be able to find it on the Internet.
>
> This means that, effectively, the “without Debi
of Debian changing its logo, this change would have close
> to no negative effect anyhow: people who really want to have an Expat
> version of our logo will be able to find it on the Internet.
This means that, effectively, the “without Debian” logo will
/still/ be available u
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:36:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> > We've also been advised not to relicense the "with 'Debian'" logo under
> > a so-called "liberal" lic
Le Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>
> We've also been advised not to relicense the "with 'Debian'" logo under
> a so-called "liberal" license like the Expat license.
Hi Stefano,
thanks a lot for solving that e
been working with SFLC/SPI to solve the "non-free Debian logo"
issue. I've now got green light to relicense the logo "with 'Debian'"
under a dual LGPLv3+/CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. Which is good!, as we'll
finally have a DFSG-free logo that we can include in the arc
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> A friend of mine kindly told me that he found the font in which the
> debian logo (the one with the red i dot) was done. I guess it would be
> a good idea to store that information somewhere when someone is
> interes
Hi!
A friend of mine kindly told me that he found the font in which the
debian logo (the one with the red i dot) was done. I guess it would be
a good idea to store that information somewhere when someone is
interested in (Joey suggested to put it in the /logos/index.wml file or
such at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 June 2002 22:28, À̹üÁØ wrote:
> <http://debianusers.org/upload/30/20020606175718/newdebianlogo.png>
>
> how about this logo??
>
> i wish that it is upload with debian's others-logo at debian logo site.
>
how about this logo??i wish that it is upload with debian's others-logo at debian logo site.i waitting for your reply-email. ^^;
[Please Cc: to me because I am not subscribed to the list.]
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:35:14 +0200,
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, check the log for logo.jpg then... maybe it's in the Attic too.
I can't find an image named logo.jpg or a directory named Attic.
The log of logo-50.jpg didn'
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:19:45AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > > I post this again because I didn't get any answer on debian-legal.
> > > What is the license of the _old_ Debian logo, that is,
> > > http://www.debian.org/Pics/old-logo.jpg ?
> > > Ope
gt; What is the license of the _old_ Debian logo, that is,
> > http://www.debian.org/Pics/old-logo.jpg ?
> > Open Publication License, or some other logo-specific license?
> I seem to remember it was something similar to the current logo license.
> Check the CVS logs for the lo
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:41:34AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> [Please Cc: to me because I am not subscribed to the list.]
>
> I post this again because I didn't get any answer on debian-legal.
> What is the license of the _old_ Debian logo, that is,
> http://www.debian.o
[Please Cc: to me because I am not subscribed to the list.]
I post this again because I didn't get any answer on debian-legal.
What is the license of the _old_ Debian logo, that is,
http://www.debian.org/Pics/old-logo.jpg ?
Open Publication License, or some other logo-specific li
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:51:15PM +, Ricardo Sandrin wrote:
> I'm from Debian-BR Project (Debian Documentation Project Brazil) i would like
> to know the font is used in the default Debian logo and where i can download
> it :)
I'm not sure Ricardo, but someone on the de
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 08:45:02PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > > The Debian logo (image) used to link to www.debian.org/logos/
> > >
> > > It appears this was clobbered, or was this by design?
> >
> > I removed the link on purpose. The logo page doesn&#x
--- Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The Debian logo (image) used to link to www.debian.org/logos/
> Is there anywhere that links to the logo page then?
> I couldn't find it anywhere.
Through the 'Miscelaneo
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 12:06:48PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 01:10:35PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > The Debian logo (image) used to link to www.debian.org/logos/
> >
> > It appears this was clobbered, or was this by design?
>
> I removed th
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 01:10:35PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> The Debian logo (image) used to link to www.debian.org/logos/
>
> It appears this was clobbered, or was this by design?
I removed the link on purpose. The logo page doesn't really deserve to be
the first link on every p
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 01:10:35PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> Respond now, else I shall return it to how it was before.
Um, in case anyone was wondering, this wasn't meant as a threat.
Just perhaps some mild humour.
--
Unix Staff, High Energy Physics Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linu
The Debian logo (image) used to link to www.debian.org/logos/
It appears this was clobbered, or was this by design?
Respond now, else I shall return it to how it was before.
--
Unix Staff, High Energy Physics Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux! http://www.debian.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 02:17:45PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> I'm a little confused. FYI, I did go through with Raul last month and
> update the 'logos' directory:
>
You did the right thing. It's just that the web pages are (or were) still
using the old images, which reside in the Pics dire
I'm a little confused. FYI, I did go through with Raul last month and
update the 'logos' directory:
1999-12-10 21:31 adam
* index.data, index.wml, officiallogo-nd.eps, officiallogo-nd.fig,
officiallogo-nd.pdf, officiallogo-nd.ps.gz, officiallogo.eps,
officiallogo.fig, o
n Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 06:43:39AM +0800, Anthony Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As pointed out in the past that the Debian logo being used in all our
> pages are not the 'real' one, I think it's good to change it to use
> the correct version.
>
> For the swirl we can c
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 06:17:20PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
|On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 06:43:39AM +0800, Anthony Wong wrote:
|
|> For the swirl we can copy logos/openlogo-nd-50.jpg to Pics/logo-50.jpg,
|
|Go ahead and commit this part.
ok.
|> for the word "debian", I have made the jpeg version
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 06:43:39AM +0800, Anthony Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As pointed out in the past that the Debian logo being used in all our
> pages are not the 'real' one, I think it's good to change it to use
> the correct version.
>
> For the swirl we
Hi all,
As pointed out in the past that the Debian logo being used in all our
pages are not the 'real' one, I think it's good to change it to use
the correct version.
For the swirl we can copy logos/openlogo-nd-50.jpg to Pics/logo-50.jpg,
for the word "debian", I have m
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Craig Small wrote:
> > So what has happened to all those nice "losing" logos?
>
> Please read the archive of debian-www. Christian had to close is machine
Perhaps I should of phrased that better.. Now that Christian has closed his
machine, where are those pages going to?
Darren Benham wrote:
> > Please read the archive of debian-www. Christian had to close is machine
>
> Are the logos around anywhere?
Read the archive.
> Do we/should we do a new page?
Not until
a) there are clear definitions what a logo is
b) we want a new logo
c) we don't kick peop
On 19-Aug-98 Martin Schulze wrote:
> Craig Small wrote:
>> G'day people,
>> We have a slight problem with the debian logo page,
>> http://www.debian.org/logos/ It has a link to the page that had all the
>> logos on http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~s
Craig Small wrote:
> G'day people,
> We have a slight problem with the debian logo page,
> http://www.debian.org/logos/ It has a link to the page that had all the
> logos on http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-logo/
> which now refers people back to h
G'day people,
We have a slight problem with the debian logo page,
http://www.debian.org/logos/ It has a link to the page that had all the
logos on http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-logo/
which now refers people back to http://www.debian.org/
So what has happened t
On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "Re: Cheapbytes Debian logo is terrible"
> | Although under the web site, there is no one who takes care of the images
> there.
> The logo page is not very easy to find. The only link I c
55 matches
Mail list logo
